Innovation and organizational performance as antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3058

Keywords:

Innovation, Innovation; performance, competitive advantage.

Abstract

Agribusiness is a set of linked operations with the objective of producing, benefiting and distributing food. This sector deals with the various activities ranging from genetic improvement to the delivery of the final product. The agents, whether small or large, are inserted in at least some part of the production chain. In this context, it is noteworthy that the innovation that has been defined as a critical issue for cooperation networks. Theory has pointed out that innovation, and organizational performance, has an influence on competitive advantage. In view of this, the general objective of this study was to identify whether innovation and organizational performance are antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle, in the view of agents working in cooperation networks in southern Brazil. Therefore, the method proposed for the development of this study is of a qualitative nature, operationalized through in-depth interviews and non-participatory observation. Nine producers were interviewed, from four cooperation networks in the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul. The results obtained show that innovation and organizational performance are antecedents of competitive advantage, in the perception of the producers who participated in the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Janine Bertelli, University of Caxias Do Sul

    Mestra em Administração pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul - UCS

References

AFUAH, A. How much do your co‐opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic management journal, v. 21, n. 3, p. 397–404, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<397::AID-SMJ88>3.0.CO;2-1

AKRAM, M. S. et al. Organizational performance and sustainability: exploring the roles of IT capabilities and knowledge management capabilities. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 10, p. 3816, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103816

ALAIE, S. A. Knowledge and learning in the horticultural innovation system: A case of Kashmir valley of India. International Journal of Innovation Studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 116–133, 1 dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.06.002

ALBERTI, F. G.; PIZZURNO, E. Oops, I did it again! Knowledge leaks in open innovation networks with start-ups. European journal of innovation management, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2015-0116

AMIT, R.; SCHOEMAKER, P. J. H. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic management journal, v. 14, n. 1, p. 33–46, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105

ANDERSEN, P. H.; MEDLIN, C. J. Transient commitments and dynamic business networking. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 58, p. 11–19, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.011

APROCCIMA. Filosofia da Associação. Disponível em: <http://www.aproccima.com.br/secao.php?pagina=2>. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.

ASHEIM, B. rn T. Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: a condition for prosperity. European planning studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 379–400, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720354

ATALAY, M.; ANAFARTA, N.; SARVAN, F. The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 75, p. 226–235, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.026

ATTRIDE-STIRLING, Jennifer. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, v. 1, n. 3, p. 385-405, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

BANBURY, C. M.; MITCHELL, W. The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic management journal, v. 16, n. S1, p. 161–182, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160922

BARNEY, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99–120, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

BEEF MARKET CENTRAL. FAO, Exportações mundiais de carne bovina: ranking de países - Beef2Live | Coma carne * viva melhor. Disponível em: <https://beef2live.com/story-world-beef-exports-ranking-countries-0-106903>. Acesso em: 3 jan. 2021.

BRAGA, M. J. Networks, strategic alliances and cooperation: The case of production chain of beef meat. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, n. SUPPL. 1, p. 11–16, 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001300002

BRYNJOLFSSON, Erik; HITT, Lorin M.; KIM, Heekyung Hellen. Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decisionmaking affect firm performance?. Available at SSRN 1819486, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1819486

BOWEN, Frances E.; ROSTAMI, Mahdi; STEEL, Piers. Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of business research, v. 63, n. 11, p. 1179-1185, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.014

CAMISÓN-ZORNOZA, César et al. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization studies, v. 25, n. 3, p. 331-361, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040039

CHEN, Y. et al. Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 127, n. 2, p. 479–500, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2059-1

CARAYANNIS, Elias G. et al. Business model innovation as antecedent of sustainable enterprise excellence and resilience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, v. 5, n. 3, p. 440-463, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0206-7

CHENG, C. C. J.; HUIZINGH, E. K. R. E. When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Journal of product innovation management, v. 31, n. 6, p. 1235–1253, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12148

COOPERALIANÇA. Programa de Carne Angus Certificada. Disponível em: <https://cooperalianca.com/angus>.

COOPERTROPAS. A Genuína Carne a Pasto da Serra Catarinense. Disponível em: <https://www.coopertropas.com.br/>. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.

COOPERTROPAS. Coopertropas a genuína carne a pasto da Serra Catarinense. 2020

COVEY, S. R. Innovation at four levels. Executive Excellence, v. 10, p. 3, 1993.

CRESWELL, J. W. et al. Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, v. 35, n. 2, p. 236–264, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390

DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555–590, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256406

DAMANPOUR, F.; ARAVIND, D. Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes and antecedents. Management and organization review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 423–454, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x

DE MARTINO, M. et al. Logistics innovation in seaports: An inter-organizational perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, v. 8, p. 123–133, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.05.001

DOSI, G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature, p. 1120–1171, 1988.

DRUCKER, P. F. Inovacao e espirito empreendedor (entrepreneurship). [s.l.] Pioneira, 1986.

FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Disponível em: <http://www.fao.org/home/en>. Acesso em: 1 maio. 2019.

FILIERI, R.; ALGUEZAUI, S. Extending the enterprise for improved innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02756661211224997

FORD, D.; MOUZAS, S. The theory and practice of business networking. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 42, n. 3, p. 433–442, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.012

FORKMANN, S.; HENNEBERG, S. C.; MITREGA, M. Capabilities in business relationships and networks: Research recommendations and directions. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 74, p. 4–26, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.007

FREEMAN, C. The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. [s.l.] MERIT, 1989.

FRIIS, O.; HOLMGREN, J.; ESKILDSEN, J. K. A strategy model–better performance through improved strategy work. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-10-2014-0083

GARCÍA‐MORALES, Víctor J.; LLORÉNS‐MONTES, Francisco Javier; VERDÚ‐JOVER, Antonio J. The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British journal of management, v. 19, n. 4, p. 299-319, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00547.x

GUMMESSON, Evert. Qualitative methods in management research. Sage, 2000.

GRANDORI, A.; SODA, G. Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms. Organization Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 183–214, 30 mar. 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600201

GRANT, R. M. Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic management journal, v. 24, n. 6, p. 491–517, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.314

HENRIQUES, E.; PEÇAS, P. New business models for the tooling industry. Journal of Current Issues in Finance, Business and Economics, v. 6, n. 2, p. 100, 2013.

HINA, S. M. et al. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Firm Performance through Organizational Learning: The Moderating Role of Environmental Turbulence. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21343

HOSKISSON, Robert E. et al. Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of management, v. 25, n. 3, p. 417-456, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500307

HSIAN-MING, L.; HSIN-FENG, Y. Network resource meets organizational agility: Creating an idiosyncratic competitive advantage for SMEs. Management Decision, v. 58, n. 1, p. 58–75, 1 jan. 2020. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-1061>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-1061

IBGE. Agricultura, pecuária e outros . Disponível em: <https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria.html>. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2020.

JIMÉNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, Daniel; SANZ-VALLE, Raquel. Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of business research, v. 64, n. 4, p. 408-417, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010

HO, Catherine SF; MOHD-RAFF, Nor Erna Nabila. External and internal determinants of performances of Shariah and non-Shariah compliant firms. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2017-0202

JONASH, R. S. O valor da inovação: como as empresas mais avançadas atingem alto desempenho e lucratividade. [s.l.] Campus, 2001.

KOBARG, S.; STUMPF-WOLLERSHEIM, J.; WELPE, I. M. More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1–10, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.014

LAVIE, D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of management review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 638–658, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318922

LEE, C.; LEE, K.; PENNINGS, J. M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 6‐7, p. 615–640, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.181

LEE, C. M. J.; CHE-HA, N.; ALWI, S. F. S. Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.048

LIAO, S.; WU, C. The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance. International journal of business and management, v. 4, n. 4, p. 64–76, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n4p64

LÓPEZ-GAMERO, M. D.; MOLINA-AZORÍN, J. F.; CLAVER-CORTÉS, E. The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: Competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. Journal of environmental management, v. 90, n. 10, p. 3110–3121, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.007

MARIOTTI, F.; HAIDER, S. Managing institutional diversity and structural holes: Network configurations for recombinant innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 160, p. 120237, 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520310635>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120237

MÖLLER, K.; SVAHN, S. Managing strategic nets: A capability perspective. Marketing theory, v. 3, n. 2, p. 209–234, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931030032002

MÜLLER, Oliver; FAY, Maria; VOM BROCKE, Jan. The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 35, n. 2, p. 488-509, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1451955

MYLAN, J. et al. Eco-innovation and retailers in milk, beef and bread chains: enriching environmental supply chain management with insights from innovation studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 107, p. 20–30, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.065

NEELY, A.; GREGORY, M.; PLATTS, K. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International journal of operations & production management, v. 25, n. 12, p. 1228–1263, 2005.

NEUMANN, M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. Estratégias de Coordenação: pricípios para a formação de alianças mercadológicas. Nespro, 2006.

NUSTINI, Yuni. Determinants of sustainable competitive advantage due to an it-enabled strategy. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, v. 11, n. 1, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol11.iss1.art2

NOKAKA, I. et al. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. Tradução de Ana Beatriz Rodrigues e Priscilla Martins Celeste. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997.

PEDROSO OAIGEN, R. et al. Competitividade inter-regional de sistemas de produção de bovinocultura de corte. Ciência Rural, v. 43, n. 8, p. 1489–1495, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013000800024

PETERAF, M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, v. 14, n. 3, p. 179–191, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303

POPADIUK, S.; CHOO, C. W. Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, v. 26, n. 4, p. 302–312, 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401206000399>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011

POPA, Simona; SOTO-ACOSTA, Pedro; MARTINEZ-CONESA, Isabel. Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 118, p. 134-142, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014

PORTER, M. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, v. 68, n. 2, p. 73–93, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1_2

PORTER, M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. [s.l.] Harvard Business School Management Programs Cambridge, 1993.

PRAHALAD, C. K.; HAMEL, G. The core competence of the corporation. In: Strategische Unternehmungsplanung/Strategische Unternehmungsführung. [s.l.] Springer, 1997. p. 969–987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41482-8_46

RICHARDS, P. J. et al. Measuring organizational performance as a dependent variable: Towards methodological best practice. Strategic Management Journal, v. 5, n. 2, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.814285

ROTHAERMEL, F. T. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 6‐7, p. 687–699, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.180

SAXTON, T. The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. Academy of management journal, v. 40, n. 2, p. 443–461, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256890

SINGH, K.; MITCHELL, W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic management journal, v. 17, n. S1, p. 99–115, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171008

SOEWARNO, N.; TJAHJADI, B.; ANMARISKA, F. Does PMS influence the strategy pillars: OPP relationship? Evidence from HEIs in Indonesia. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0041

STUART, T. E.; HOANG, H.; HYBELS, R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative science quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 315–349, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2666998

SZÉKELY, F.; KNIRSCH, M. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility:: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, v. 23, n. 6, p. 628–647, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.009

TAX, S. S.; MCCUTCHEON, D.; WILKINSON, I. F. The service delivery network (SDN) a customer-centric perspective of the customer journey. Journal of Service Research, v. 16, n. 4, p. 454–470, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513481108

TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capability and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

TÖDTLING, F.; LEHNER, P.; KAUFMANN, A. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, v. 29, n. 1, p. 59–71, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002

AN DEN BOSCH, F. A. J.; VAN WIJK, R.; VOLBERDA, H. W. Absorptive capacity: Antecedents, models and outcomes. 2003.

VAN FENEMA, P. C.; KEERS, B. B. M. Rediscovering strategic content in ‘strong process’ research on business network innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 91, p. 639–656, 2020. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850116302759>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.005

VAN MAANEN, J. Qualitative studies of organizations. [s.l.] Sage, 1998. v. 1

VAN, N. T.; CAO, N. N.; J.H., B. O. Identifying key success factors in supply chain management for increasing the competitive advantages of Vietnamese coffee. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, v. 27, n. 5, p. 438–461, 1 jan. 2017. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-10-2016-0066>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-10-2016-0066

VAN WIJK, R. et al. How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: A study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 24, n. 9, p. 929–950, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.718666

WAGYU, A. B. dos C. de B. das R. Associação Brasileira dos Criadores de Bovinos das Raças Wagyu. Disponível em: <http://www.wagyu.org.br/>. Acesso em: 8 fev. 2021.

WOGWU, V. E.; HAMILTON, D. I. Reconfiguration Capability and Competitive Advantage: A Study of Port Harcourt Public Health Sector. Management, v. 8, n. 2, p. 47–53, 2018.

ZHOU, W. et al. When do strategic orientations matter to innovation performance of green-tech ventures? The moderating effects of network positions. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 279, p. 123743, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123743

Downloads

Published

2021-04-01

How to Cite

CAMARGO, M. E., Silva, J. E. A. da, Dullius, A. I. dos S., Bizotto, B. L. S., Motta, M. . E. V. da, & Bertelli, J. (2021). Innovation and organizational performance as antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(4), 288-303. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3058
Received 2021-03-15
Accepted 2021-03-24
Published 2021-04-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>