Field’s Education in the National Plans of Education
Tensions, Contradictions and Challenges in the Face of the Assurance and the Denial of the Right to Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss4.2273Keywords:
Rural Education, National Education Plan, Public policyAbstract
The present work is the result of studies performed at the college’s subject Education, Public Policy and Management in Education. The function of this work is to investigate the tensions, contradictions and new challenges that are engendered in the confrontations towards the assurance and the denial of the right to education for the peasant population. The research was developed through a documentation analysis of qualitative nature, guided in the dialectical historical materialism approach as a method. This work is based on the theoretical assumptions defended by Arroyo and Fernandes (1999), Caldart (2003; 2011), Marx and Engels (2011, among others. The findings indicate advances in the Education National Plan (2014), but it did not show significant achievements towards the Field’s Education. There is a long way to go in the educational rights for the peasant population, which are permeated by tensions, contradictions and challenges. significant achievements with regard to the Rural Education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Maria das Graça Santos Ribeiro, Igor Tairone Ramos dos Santos, Adenilson Souza Cunha Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
