Would Criminal Sanctions For Patent Violations Encourage Violators to Respect Intellectual Property Rights?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss9.1142Keywords:
Property RightsAbstract
This paper analyzes the historical differences between copyrights and patents. Copyright law allows for criminal sanctions for violations. Patent law does not allow for criminal sanctions. The paper looks at this history and poses the question—Why the difference? The paper analyzes these differences and asserts that an imbalance exists between the two types of intellectual property that needs to be adjusted.
References
Act of January 6, 1897, 54 Cong. Ch. 4, January 6, 1897, 29 Stat. 481
Bloomberg News (2018). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-25/apple-says-it-
wasn-t-about-money-after-samsung-loses-patent-bet.
CNET. https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-v-samsung-50-suits-10-countries-and-counting/
Cong. Ch. 15, May 31, 1790, 1 Stat. 124)
Copyright Act of 1909, §28, 35 Stat. 1075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5000282001
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, (1998). 112 Stat. 2860
Dodd-Frank Act, (2010). Pub.L. 111–203
Dubber, M.D. (2013). The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2114300
New Crim. L. Rev 203.
Economic Espionage Act, (1996). Pub. L. 104–294.
Friedrichs, D.O. (2009) Trusted Criminals: white collar crime in contemporary society,4th ed.
Cengage Unlimited Publishing.
Greene, F. (2016) The Path Towards Clear and Convincing Privacy Rights. A dissertation submitted to Purdue University Graduate School. Published by Proquest, LLC. # 10172338. (The current article is taken almost verbatim from selected portions of the 2016 dissertation, with additional commentary and analysis.)
H.R. Rep. No. 93-1581, at 4 (1974) reprinted in 1974 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6849
Leahy-Smith Act, (2011). Pub. L. 112–29.
Mendez, N. (2008). Patent Infringers, Come Out With Your Hands Up! Should the United States
Criminalize Patent Infringement?, 6 Buff. Intell. Prop. L.J. 34.
Mossoff, A. (2007). Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents? Reevaluating
the Patent “Privilege” in Historical Context, 92 Cor. L. Rev. 953.Patentability and Eligibility, (2017). 35 U.S.C. §101-112
Pub. L. No. 92-140, 85 Stat. 391 (1971) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(71)80047-1
Pub. L. No. 97-180, 96 Stat. 91 (1982). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(82)90420-5
Silbey, J. (2008) The Mythical Beginnings of Intellectual Property, 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 319
U.S. Patent Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 109.
U.S. Patent Act of 1793, 1 Stat. 318
Walterscheld, E. C. (1997). To Promote the Progress to Useful Arts: American Patent Law and Administration, 1787-1836. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 79 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 61.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Frederick Greene, Linda Naimi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Frederick Greene, Linda Naimi, Why congress needs to act to update protection for electronic communications from multiple and extensive threats from around the world. , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 6 No. 8 (2018): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research