Assessing landscape changes of catchment area of Upper Lake Bhopal using patch analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss7.213Keywords:
Catchment, Landscape Indices, Patch parameters, spatio-temporal dynamics, Landscape dynamicsAbstract
Anthropogenic activities impart serious challenges on wetland management. The issues of Anthropogenic Activities manifest in the form of environmental degradation, point and non-point source pollution of lake water. Catchment area of upper lake Bhopal has been witnessing the same scenario; raising the question of its planning and management to control water pollution. It shows the necessity to analyse and study the pattern of land use & land cover(LULC). In order to assess the LULC pattern and spatio-temporal dynamics the changing pattern of patch number(NP), class area(CA), mean patch size(MPS), mean shape index (MSI), Shannon’s Diversity index(SHDI), Simpson’s Diversity Index(SDI) of all land use/land cover categories. In this research
paper above mentioned parameters were measured and analyzed for landuse/landcover change from year 2003 to 2011. Area of agriculture and built up land expanded 16.18% and 4.77% while number of patches reduced by 332 and 187 for these two classes respectively. On the other hand class area of vegetation and barren land reduced 9.33% and 11.62%. Few patches of vegetation completely eliminated resulted in reduction of number of patches by 1250. Increased no. of patches of barren land by 150 shows fragmentation. Reduction in diversity indices indicates that area becomes less diversified during study period. During the period of 2003 to 2011 shape of patches of agriculture and built up land becomes more complex and that of barren land and vegetation converted to simpler shape. These indices provided meaningful insights pertaining to the spatiotemporal dynamics prevailing in the catchment area of Upper Lake Bhopal.
References
Geneletti D.,2004. Using spatial indicators and value functions to assess ecosystem fragmentation caused by DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2003.08.004
linear infrastructures. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5, 1-15.
Giles R.H., Trani M.K., 1999. Key elements of Landscape Pattern Measures. Environmental Management 23, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679900202
-481.
Griffith, J. A., Martinko, E. A., & Price, K. P. (2000).Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00112-2
Landscape and Urban Planning, 52(1), 45–61.
Junhon Bai, Hua Quyang (2008) Changes in landscape pattern of alpine wetlands on the Zoige Plateau in the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60046-3
past four decades. ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA, 28(5) 2245-2252.
Lee, S.W., Ellis, D., & Hong, S. K. (2008).Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.013
satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1), 60–70.
Maureen Hulshoff R. (1995) Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape. Landscape Ecology, 10(2), 101- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153827
McGarigal K., Marks B.J.,1995.FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for quantifying Landscape DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-351
Structure. Oregon State University Forest Science Department, Corvallis, Oregon.
Munroe, D. K., Croissant, C., & York, A. M. (2005).Land use policy and landscape fragmentation in an
urbanizing region: Assessing the impact of zoning. Applied Geography, 25(2), 121–141.
Newell, J. P., Robinson, L., & Marzluff, J. M. (2005). Twenty five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth
management responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(1), 51–72.
Sudhira, H. S., Ramachandra, T. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2004).Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modeling DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2003.08.002
using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5(1), 29–39.
Sun, J., Xia, H., Lan, C., & Xin, K. (2006). A gradient analysis based on the buffer zones of urban landscape
pattern of the constructed area in Guigang City, Guangxi, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(3), 655–662.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Ajit Kumar Jain, S. K Katiyar, M. S Chauhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
