Influence of headteachers' communication planning practices on Management performance in public primary schools in Thika West sub-county, Kiambu county, Kenya.

Margaret Mbirua; Dr. Ruth  Thinguri; Dr. Reuben K.  Kenei

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss6.2393

Authors

Margaret Mbirua a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:7:"Student";}
Dr. Ruth Thinguri Mount Kenya University. Thika, Kenya
Dr. Reuben K. Kenei Mount Kenya University. Thika, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss6.2393

Keywords:

Headteachers’ communication planning practices, management performance in primary schools

Abstract

Communication is very critical in primary school management by ensuring that there is improved efficiency. However, in many primary schools in Thika West Sub-county encounter challenges which border on school management such as unhealthy staff relations, imprudent use of financial resources, poor maintenance of facilities, imprudent time management and under-utilization of instructional materials are on the rise. Thus, this study sought to assess the influence of headteachers’ communication planning practices on management performance in public primary schools in Thika West Sub-county, Kiambu County, Kenya. The study was guided by the communication theory and school management theory. The study adopted mixed methodology and concurrent triangulation research design. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically along the objectives and presented in narrative forms. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively using frequencies and percentages and inferentially using ANOVA Test Analysis using Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS Version 23) and presented using tables. The study established that headteachers’ communication planning practices influence on management performance in primary schools. The study recommends that headteachers should ensure that they design the content of message to be relayed and also identify the specific recipients of their information to be communicated. Headteachers should adopt layers of communication which are efficient and provide immediate and objective feedback. Headteachers should adopt forms of communication to suit every occasion to avoid interruptions. Headteachers should adopt a feedback mechanism which guarantees efficiency and prudence in school management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Ruth Thinguri, Mount Kenya University. Thika, Kenya

Department of Educational Management and Curriculum Studies
Dr. Reuben K. Kenei, Mount Kenya University. Thika, Kenya

Department of Educational Management and Curriculum Studies

References

Adeniyi, C. (2003). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration. Administrative Science Quarterly 28(1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392382

Allan, P. (2001). Accounting and Finance: A firm foundation, Mishawaka, USA.

Alvesson, M. (2002). Communication power and organization, in Swedish (2nd ed.). Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.

Anderson, J. (1996). Communication theory: Epistemological foundations. New York: Guilford Press.

Begley, P. (2001). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(4), 353-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120110078043

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

De Ridder, J. (2003). Organizational communication and supportive employees. Human Resource Management Journal, 4(4), 1-10.

Dolphin, R. (2005). Internal communications: Today’s strategic imperative. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(3), 172-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1352726042000315414

Goodman, P. & Dean, J. (2014). Change in Communication (pp. 226-279). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Jablin, F. & Putnam, L. (2001). The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances theory, research and methods. California: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986243

Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of Professional Development: A framework for analysis. Journal of in-service education, 31(2), 235 – 250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580500200277

Kindiki, G. & Stewart, D. (2011). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 63, 426–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426

Kuo, L. (2009). Principles of Management Theories and Practices. International Journal of Management Theory & Practices. Vol. (3), 234-255

Lewis, L. (2000). Communicating change: Four cases of quality programs. Journal of Business Communication, 37, 128-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002194360003700201

Musyoka, T. & Peterson, K. (2012). Headteachers’ Interpersonal Approaches to School Communication. American Behavioral Scientist. 16(4), 469-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402

Okoth, P. & Anderson, T. (2010). School improvement through effective communication. Nairobi: Acts Press.