Teaching a course with active learning approaches and training other teachers about deep learning strategies

Authors

  • Pawan Tyagi University of the District of Columbia, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss12.281

Abstract

This paper describes different stages of teaching a course using active learning approaches. For this study author has utilized MECH 488 Fuel Cell Science and Technology course. This paper describes the strategies for developing a student active teaching approach that relies on promising syllabus, conceptual quizzes, peer interaction, self-reflection through an after class feedback form. This paper will elaborate on the structure and effectiveness of the feedback form aiming to improving the student attention and participation in the class discussions. To promote active teaching at university campus author have started conducting workshops on deep learning strategies. Content of these workshops are based the author’s experience during active learning driven teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Pawan Tyagi, University of the District of Columbia, USA

    Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science

References

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do: Harvard University Press.

Bain, K. (2012). What the best college students do: Belknap Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067479

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 4, 2.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hufnagel, B. (2011). Innovative Strategies for Empowering

Your Students to Become Active, Responsible Learners (Vol. 443). San Francisco: Astronomical Soc Pacific.

Johnstone, A. H., & Percival, F. (1976). Attention breaks in lectures. Education in Chemistry, 13, 49-50.

McDermott, L. C. (1991). MILLIKAN LECTURE 1990 -

WHAT WE TEACH AND WHAT IS LEARNED - CLOSING THE GAP. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301-315.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning really work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education., 93. , 223-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., & Knight, J. K. (2011). Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor

Explanation Increases Student Learning from InClass Concept Questions. Cbe-Life Sciences

Education, 10, 55-63.

Thacker, B., Kim, E., Trefz, K., & Lea, S. M. (1994).

COMPARING PROBLEM-SOLVING

PERFORMANCE OF PHYSICS STUDENTS IN INQUIRY-BASED AND TRADITIONAL INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS COURSES. American

Journal of Physics, 62, 627-633.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Tyagi, P. (2014). Teaching a course with active learning approaches and training other teachers about deep learning strategies. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(12), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss12.281