The roles of student engagement motivations in learning and managing.

Ngo Hai Quynh; Nguyen Thanh Hoai; Nguyenthingoc Thu

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3043

Authors

Ngo Hai Quynh

University of Danang
Nguyen Thanh Hoai

University of Danang
Nguyenthingoc Thu

University of Danang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3043

Keywords:

Student engagement, Intrinsic motivation, Extrinsic motivation, Behavioral engagement, Academic achievement

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore how the combined influence of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic one on the engagement about behavioral, emotional, and cognitive of university students to bring academic achievements. To do this, an experimental questionnaire is designed to collect data from Vietnamese students in Danang and employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to estimate the relationships among proposed variables. The results from 393 samples indicated that intrinsic motivation is the crucial element stimulating their efforts and engagement to obtain learning success. In contrast, extrinsic motivation is found to not bring a positive influence on the cognitive engagement of students. Therefore, this is an important research result that contributes to the theoretical foundation of student engagement as well as makes sense for the management of higher education

Author Biographies

Ngo Hai Quynh, University of Danang

Lecturer at Vietnam-Korea University of Information and Communication Technology
Nguyen Thanh Hoai, University of Danang

Lecturer at Vietnam- Korea University of Information and Communication Technology
Nguyenthingoc Thu, University of Danang

Official at Vietnam- Korea University of Information and Communication Technology

References

Barger, V., Schultz, E., & Peltier, J. (2016). Social media & CE: a review & research agenda. J. of Research in Interactive Mark., 10(4), 268-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-06-2016-0065

Bergström, E., & Martinez, M. (2016). Influence of the Intrinsic & Extrinsic Motivation on EE- qualitative study of perception of managers in public & private sector organization.

Bilda, Z. (2011). Designing for audience E. Interacting: art, research & the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, 163-181.

Bollen, K. (1989). new incremental fit index for general SEM. Sociological method & research J., 17(3), 303-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004

Brodie, J., Hollebeek, L., Ilic, A., & Juric, B. (2013). CE in a virtual brand community-An exploratory analysis. J. of business research, 66(1), 105-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029

Carter, M., Williams, S., McGee, R., &Taylor, B. (2007). Health outcome in adolescence- Association with family, friend and StE. J. of adolescence, 30(1), 51-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.04.002

Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approache to assessing SE rate. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 8(13), 1-10.

Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. of mark. research, 16(1), 64-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110

Connell, J. P., Aber, J., & Spencer, M. B. (1994). Educational risk & resilience in African‐American youth. Child development, 65(2), 493-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00765.x

Ekstrom, R. B. (1986). Who drop out of high school & why? Finding from a national study. TCR, 87(3), 356-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146818608700308

Fredricks, J., Paris, A., & Blumenfeld, P. (2004). School E - Potential of concept, state of evidence. RER, 74(1), 59-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gersten, R., Flojo, J. & Jordan, N. (2005). Early identification & interventions for student with mathematics difficulties. J of learning disabilities, 38(4), 293-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040301

Hair, J., Tatham, R., Black, W., Anderson, R., & Babin, B. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5(3), 207-219. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.

Han, K., Carroll, J., Rosson, M., & Shih, P., (2016). Understanding local community attachment, E & social support network mediated by mobile technology. IWC, 28(3), 220-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu040

Harbour, K., Hughes, L. E., Sweigart, C., & Evanovich, L. (2015). A brief review of the effective teaching practice that maximize SE. Alternative Education for Children & Youth, 59(1), 5-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136

Hermans, H. (1970). A questionnaire measure of the achievement motivation. J of Applied Psychology, 54(4), 353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029675

Jennings, M., & Stoker, L. (2004). Social trust & CE across time & generations. AP, 39(4), 342-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500077

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing SE in higher education. Studies in higher education, 38(5), 758-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Klem, A. & Connell, J. (2004). Relationships matter - Linking teacher support to SE & achievement. J of school health, 74, 262-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x

Kusi-Sarpong, S., Agyemang, J., Avila, P., Putnik, G., & Varela, M. (2018). Supplier evaluation & selection - a fuzzy novel multi-criteria group decision-making approach. I J for Quality Research, 12(2), 459-486.

Lepper, M., Iyengar, S., & Corpus, J. (2005). Intrinsic & extrinsic motivational orientation in the classroom - Age difference & academic correlates. J of educational psychology, 97(2), 184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184

Liem, G., & Martin, A. (2012). The motivation & E scale - Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, & applied yield. AP, 47(1), 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x

Malthouse, E., & Calder, B. (2018). From advertising to E. The Handbook of Communication E, 411-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119167600.ch28

Marks, H. (2000). SE in instructional activity - Pattern in elementary, middle, & high school years. EARJ, 37(1), 153-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153

Martin, A. (2010). Should student have a gap year? Motivation & performance factor relevant to time out after completing school. J of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019321

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotion & SE. In Handbook of research on SE, 259-282. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12

Pekrun, R., Perry, R., Barchfeld, P., Frenzel, A., & Goetz, T. (2011). Measuring emotion in students’ learning & performance: AEQ. Contemporary educational psychology, 36(1), 36-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002

Piedmont, R. (1989). The Life Activities Achievement Scale - act-frequency approach to the measurement of the motivation. EPM, 49(4), 863-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448904900409

Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, & applications. Prentice Hall.

Putra, E., Liu, J., & Cho, S. (2017). Extrinsic & intrinsic motivation on WE in hospitality industry. Tourism & Hospitality Research, 17(2), 228-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358415613393

Quynh, N. (2019). The Moderating Influence of the Brand Image on the Relationship Between CE and Customer Loyalty. Indian J of Marketing, 49(9), 42-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i9/146939

Quynh, N., Hoai, N., & VanLoi, N. (2020b), Investigating the role of user experience in online shopping system. J of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 98(20), 3165-3179.

Quynh, N.H., Hoai, N.T., & Adang T., Thu NTN., (2021). What Motivates Students Engaging with Public Universities: A Case in Vietnam. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(2), 1111-1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.2251

Quynh, N., Hoai, N., Nha, N., Gi-Du, K. (2020a). The role of CE in the interrelationship process - moderating effect of customer experience. International J of Business Innovation & Research, 23(1), 64-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2020.109331

Reeve, J., Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2004). The Self-determination theory- A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influence on student motivation. BHR, 4, 31-60.

Reschly, A., & Christenson, S. (2006). Prediction of the dropout among student with mild disabilities - A case for inclusion of SE variables. RSE, 27(5), 276-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270050301

Rodríguez, L., & Conchas, G. (2009). Preventing truancy & dropout among urban middle school youth. Education & urban society, 41(2), 216-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124508325681

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). The darker & brighter side of the human existence - Basic psychological need as a unifying concept. PI, 11(4), 319-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2001). On happiness & human potentials - A review of the research on hedonic & eudaimonic well-being. ARP, 52(1), 141-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2009). Promoting self-determined SE: Motivation, learning, & well-being.

Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences SE - a qualitative case study. J of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252

Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., González-Romá, V., & Salanova, M. (2002). The measurement of E E burnout - A two sample CFA approach. J of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Schlechty, P. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schunk, D., Pintrich, P., & Meece, J. (2012). Theory, research, & application: Motivation in education. Pearson Higher Ed.

Skinner, C., Henington, C., & Fletcher, P. (1996). Increasing learning rate by increasing student response rate. SPQ, 11(4), 313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088937

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., & Kindermann, T. (2009). A motivational perspective on E & disaffection - Conceptualization & assessment of children’ behavioral & emotional participation in academic activitie. EPM, 69(3), 493-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233

Solem, B., & Pedersen, P. (2016). The role of CBE in social media - conceptualisation, measurement, antecedent & outcome. International J of Internet Mark. & Advertising, 10(4), 223-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMA.2016.081344

Sun, J., & Hsieh, P. (2018). Application of the gamified IRS to enhance the intrinsic & extrinsic motivation, SE, & attention of English learners. JETS, 21(3), 104-116.

Tilley, J. J. (2007). Cultural relativism. TBES, 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc176.pub2

Tremblay, M., Villeneuve, M., Taylor, S., Blanchard, C., & Pelletier, L. (2009). Work Extrinsic & Intrinsic Motivation Scale. Canadian J of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167

Turner, J., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influence on student participation. TCR, 106(9), 1759-1785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810410600905

Tyler, K., & Boelter, C. (2008). Linking black middle school students' perception of the teachers' expectation to academic E & efficacy. NER, 59(1/2), 27.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2002). Development of competence belief, expectancies for success, & achievement value from childhood. In DAM, 91-120. Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1

Wigfield, A., Wagner, A. & Lutz, S. L., (2005). Early adolescents’ development across the middle school years. Professional school counseling, 9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0500900206

Wolters, C., & Taylor, D. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on SE. In Handbook of research on SE, 635-651. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_30