Bubble Deck Slab System: A Review on the Design and Performance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss9.3397

Keywords:

Bubble deck slab, Biaxial slab, Voided slab, Hollow recycled plastic balls, Reinforced concrete slab

Abstract

The conventional floor slab has few drawbacks of giving little structural support and posing a large amount of self-weight to a building. Therefore, bubble deck slab system is introduced to tackle these limitations. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the bubble deck slab system on its design and performance. A systematic literature review was conducted in this paper based on the selected journal and articles through the database search engine. The findings will better understand the feasibility of the bubble deck slab system and its potential as a viable replacement for the conventional floor slabs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Zalena Abdul Aziz, Universiti Sains Malaysia

    Lecturer, School of Housing, Building and Planning

  • Lek Heng Chan, Universiti Sains Malaysia

    Postgraduate student, School of Housing, Building and Planning

References

Abg Adenan, D. S. Q., Kartini, K., & Hamidah, M. S. (2020). Comparative Study on Bubble Deck Slab and Conventional Reinforced Concrete Slab – A Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Materials Science, 70(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.37934/arms.70.1.1826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/arms.70.1.1826

Ahmad Halmi, N. Q., & Ismail, Z. (2017). ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND EXISTING REGULATIONS: A REVIEW ANALYSIS. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment; Vol 2 No 1 (2017): MySE.Vol.2.No.1. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v2i1.5577

Amoushahi Khouzani, M., Zeynalian, M., Hashemi, M., Mostofinejad, D., & Farahbod, F. (2020). Study on shear behavior and capacity of biaxial ellipsoidal voided slabs. Structures, 27(June), 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.017

Berni, M., Kamaruddin, K., & Mohd, H. (2019). Application of the Bubble Deck Slab Technology in Malaysia. 7(1), 43–53.

Bhowmik, R., Mukherjee, S., Das, A., & Banerjee, S. (2017). Review on Bubble Deck with Spherical Hollow Balls. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(8), 979–987.

Chung, J. H., Choi, H. K., Lee, S. C., & Choi, C. S. (2011). Shear capacity of biaxial hollow slab with donut type hollow sphere. Procedia Engineering, 14, 2219–2222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.279

Chung, Joo Hong, Jung, H. S., Bae, B. il, Choi, C. S., & Choi, H. K. (2018). Two-Way Flexural Behavior of Donut-Type Voided Slabs. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0247-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0247-6

Dheepan, K. R., Saranya, S., & Aswini, S. (2017). Experimental Study on Bubble Deck Slab using Polypropylene balls. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 5(4), 716–721.

Garg, A., Goyal, A., Prince, T., Jangid, C., Hussain, A., Brahm, C., Government, P., & College, E. (2019). Bubble Deck Slab Construction and its Applications. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 936–942.

Habeeb, M., Al-azzawi, A. A., & Al-zwainy, F. M. S. (2021). Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences Punching shear behavior of LWA bubble deck slab with different types of shear reinforcement. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 33(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.01.001

Hai, L. V., Hung, V. D., Thi, T. M., Nguyen-Thoi, T., & Phuoc, N. T. (2013). The Experimental Analysis of Bubbledeck Slab using Modified Elliptical Balls. Proceedings of the Thirteenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-13).

Ibrahim, A.M., Ismael, M. A., Abdul, H., & Abdul, S. (2019). The Effect of Balls Shapes and Spacing on Structural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Bubbled Slabs. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 23(02), 56–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.23.2.5

Ibrahim, Amer M, Oukaili, N. K. A., & Salman, W. D. (2013). Flexural Behaviour and Sustainable Analysis of Polymer Bubbled Reinforced Concrete Slabs. December, 11–13.

Jamal, J., & Jolly, J. (2017). A Study on Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slab using Spherical and Elliptical Balls. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 04(05), 2090–2095.

Jamal, J., & Vijayan, V. (2018). A Study on Strengthening of Bubble Deck Slab with Elliptical Balls by using GFRP Sheets. International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 6(01), 659–663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3591289

Lai, T., & Connor, J. J. (2010). Structural Behavior of BubbleDeck Slabs And Their Application to Lightweight Bridge Decks. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Lop, N. S., Che Ahmad, A., & Nik Zulkipli, N. A. D. (2016). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GREEN BUILDING IN MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: DETERMINATION OF KEY SUCCESS FACTORS. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment; Vol 1 No 1 (2016): MySE.Vol.1.No.1. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v1i1.5561

Mohan, A., & Sukumaran, A. (2018). Performance Analysis of Bubble Deck Slab Using Elliptical Balls. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 6(06), 2–5.

Mushfiq, M. S., Student, P. G., Prof, A., Saini, S., & Nishant, A. P. (2017). Experimental Study on Bubble Deck Slab. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 04(05), 1000–1004.

Naik, S. R., & Joshi, D. (2017). A Voided Slab and Conventional Flat Slab; A Comparative Study. IJSTE -International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 4(1), 44–50. http://www.ijste.org/articles/IJSTEV4I1016.pdf

Oukaili, N., & Merie, H. (2018). Sustainability Analysis and Shear Capacity of BubbleDeck Slabs with Openings. 2018 11th International Conference on Developments in ESystems Engineering (DeSE), March 2019, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/DeSE.2018.00051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DeSE.2018.00051

Pandey, M., & Srivastava, M. (2016). Analysis of Bubble Deck Slab Design by Finite Element Method. International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 2(11), 599–606.

Sagadevan, R., & Rao, B. N. (2019). Effect of void former shapes on one-way flexural behaviour of biaxial hollow slabs. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 11(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-0231-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-0231-7

Selcuk, A. A. (2019). A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA. Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 57(1), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2019.4058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2019.4058

Serge, M., Patrick, T., & Duquenoy, F. (2016). Motion Systems: An Overview of Linear, Air Bearing, and Piezo Stages. In Three-Dimensional Microfabrication Using Two-Photon Polymerization: Fundamentals, Technology, and Applications (pp. 148–167). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-35321-2.00008-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-35321-2.00008-X

Teja, P. P., Kumar, P. V., Anusha, S., Mounika, C. H., & Saha, P. (2012). Structural Behavior of Bubble Deck Slab. March 2015.

Vinod Kumar, M., & Hamza, T. A. (2020). Finite element analysis on effect of different ball spacing in bubble deck lightweight concrete slab. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 872(1), 0–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/872/1/012124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/872/1/012124

Vinod Kumar, M., Siddharamaiah, Y., & Jaideep, C. (2019). Performance of fibre integrated RC frames manufactured using alternative material as aggregate for sustainable environment. Journal of Green Engineering, 9(2), 201–211.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-01

How to Cite

Aziz, Z. A., & Chan, L. H. (2021). Bubble Deck Slab System: A Review on the Design and Performance . International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(9), 575-588. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss9.3397
Received 2021-08-20
Accepted 2021-08-30
Published 2021-09-01