Special Needs Student Developing Automaticity With Multiplication Facts Six to Nine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss12.3582

Keywords:

autism, learning disabilities, multiplication facts, automaticity

Abstract

In previous studies, the student used skip counting and her hands to recall [1] all the multiplication facts for the ones to fives and also gained automaticity [2] for the ones to fives facts. In the current study the ninth-grade student was able to memorize the multiplication facts (0 to 10) for the sixes to nines and gained automaticity with 80% accuracy. The overall goal of the current study was to improve the student’s automaticity of multiplication facts (0-10) for the sixes through nines, such as 6 x 7 = 42. The student had been taught multiplication concepts in her elementary years and she has a basic understanding of the meaning of multiplication facts as shown in the previous studies.  She understood that 6 x 7 is a representation of six sets of seven or 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 = 42.  The student had previously used skip counting and flash cards with illustrations of the multiplication facts to memorize the facts. In the current study a multiple baseline design was used to measure the acquisition of fluency of multiplication facts over time. The student was able to develop automaticity with 80% accuracy by giving the solution within 3 seconds for all of the facts (0-10) for the sixes through nines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Estella De Los Santos, University of Houston - Victoria

    Professor, School of Education

References

De Los Santos, E, “Helping a Student with Learning Disabilities Memorize Multiplication Facts”, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, Vol. 7 No. 7, 2019, pp. 133-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss7.1590

De Los Santos, E, “Helping a Student with Learning Disabilities Develop Automaticity with Multiplication Facts”, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, Vol. 8 No. 5, 2020, pp. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss7.2459

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, NCTM, Reston, Va, 2000, p. 148, 153.

Common Core State Standards Initiative, Preparing America’s Students for College & Career, Mathematics Standards, 2014, Grade 3, p. 23.

Agaliotis, I. and A. Teli, “Teaching arithmetic combinations of multiplication and division to students with learning disabilities or mild intellectual disability: The impact of alternative fact grouping and the role of cognitive and learning factors”, Journal of Education and Learning, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2016, pp. 90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n4p90

Baroody, A.J., N.P. Bajwa, and M. Eiland, “Why can’t Johnny remember the basic facts? Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, Vol. 15 No. 1, 2009, pp. 69- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.45

Baroody, A.J. “Mastering the basic number combinations”, Teaching Children Mathematics, Aug. 2006, pp. 22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.13.1.0022

Crawford, D.B., “The third stage of learning math facts: Developing automaticity”, R&D Instructional Solutions, pp. 2003, pp. 1-40. https://www.rocketmath.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Math-Facts-research.1.pdf

Woodward, J, “Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills”, Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 269-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30035554

Baker, A.T. and J. Cuevas, “The importance of automaticity development in mathematics”, Georgia Educational Researcher, Vol. 14 No. 2, 2018, pp. 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2018.140202

Bouck, E.C., L. Bassette, T. Taber-Doughty, L.M. Flanagan, and K. Szwed, “Pentop computers as tools for teaching multiplication to students with mild intellectual disabilities”, Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 44 No. 3, 2009, pp. 367-380.

Geary, D.C., M.K. Hoard, J. Byrd-Craven, L. Nugent, and C. Numtee, “Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability”, Child Development, Vol. 78 No. 4, 2007, pp. 1343-1359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x

Gersten, R., N.C. Jordan, and J.R. Flojo, “Early identification and interventions for students with mathematical difficulties”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 38 No. 4, 2005, 293-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040301

Van De Walle, J.A., K.S. Karp, and J.M. Bay-Williams, Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, 2010.

Miller, S.P. and P.J. Hudson, “Helping Students with Disabilities Understand What Mathematics Means”, Teaching Exceptional Children, Vol. 39 No. 1, 2006, pp. 28-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990603900105

Hinton, V., S.D. Strozier, and M.M. Flores, “Building Mathematical Fluency for Students with Disabilities or Students At-Risk for Mathematics Failure”, International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, Vol. 2 No. 4, Oct. 2014, pp. 257-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.69677

Mudaly, V. and J. Naidoo, “The concrete-representational-abstract Sequence of Instruction in Mathematics Classrooms”, Perspectives in Education, Vol. 33 No. 1, 2015, pp. 42-56.

Stroizer, S., V. Hinton, M. Flores, and L. Terry, “An Investigation of the Effects of CRA Instruction and Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder”, Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 50 No. 2, 2015, pp. 223-236.

Flores, M.M., V.M. Hinton, S.D. Strozier, and S.L. Terry, “Using the Concrete-representational-abstract Sequence and the Strategic Instruction Model to Teach Computation to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Developmental Disabilities”, Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 49 No. 4, 2014, pp. 547-554.

Miller, S.P., C.D. Mercer, and A.S. Dillon, “CSA: Acquiring and Retaining Math Skills”, Intervention in School and Clinic, Vol. 28 No. 2, 1992, pp. 105-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129202800206

Morin, V.A. and S.P. Miller, “Teaching multiplication to middle school students with mild intellectual disabilities, Education and Treatment of Children, Vol. 21 No. 1, 1998, pp. 22-36.

Parmar, R.S., J.F. Cawley, and J.H. Miller, “Differences in mathematics performance between students with learning disabilities and students with mild intellectual disabilities”, Exceptional Children, Vol. 60 No. 6, 1994, pp. 549-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299406000607

Thorton, C.A. and M.A. Toohey, “Basic Math Facts: Guidelines for Teaching and Learning”, Learning Disabilities Focus, Vol. 1 No. 1, 1985, pp. 44-57. [***Was [33] ***]

ASCD Express, “Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities in the Regular classroom”, Learning with Disabilities, Vol. 7 No. 7, 2012, pp. 1-6.

Wood, D.K., A.R. Frank, and D.P. Wacker, “Teaching Multiplication Facts to Students with Learning Disabilities, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 31 No. 3, 1998, pp. 323-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-323

Codding, R.S., M. Shiyko, M. Russo, S. Birch, S., E. Fanning, and D. Jaspen, “Comparing mathematics interventions: Does initial level of fluency predict intervention effectiveness?”, Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 45 No. 6, 2007, pp. 603-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.005

Skinner, C.H., T.F. McLaughlin, and P. Logan, “Cover-Copy, and Compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings”, Journal of Behavioral Education, Vol. 7 No. 3, 1997, pp. 295-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022823522040

Morton, R.C. and D.L. Gadke, “A comparison of Math Cover, Copy, Compare intervention procedures for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder”, Behavior Analysis in Practice, Vol. 11 No. 1, 2018, pp. 80-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0181-0

Burns, M.K., “Using Incremental Rehearsal to Increase fluency of single-digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation”, Education and Treatment of Children, Vol. 28 No. 3, 2005, 237-249.

Cravalho, C.J., T.F. McLaughlin, K.M. Derby and T. Waco, “The effects of Direct Instruction Flashcards on Math Performance with Measures of Generalization across Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorder”, International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2014, pp. 16-31.

Lund, K., T.F. McLaughlin, J. Neyman, and M. Everson, “The Effects of DI Flashcards and Math Racetrack on Multiplication Facts for Two Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities”, Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-15.

Mattingly, J.C. and D.A. Bott, “Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning problems”, Exceptional Children, Vol. 56 No. 5, 1990, pp. 438-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299005600507

Glover, P., T. McLaughlin, K.M. Derby, and J. Gower, “Using a Direct Instruction Flashcard System with Two Students with Learning Disabilities”, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, Vol. 8 No. 2, 2010, pp. 457-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v8i21.1381

Parmar, R.S., R. Frazita, and J.F. Cawley, “Mathematics Assessment for Students with Mild Disabilities: An Exploration of Content Validity”, Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, 1996, pp. 127-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1511253

Tawney, J.W. and D.L. Gast, Eds., Single Subject Research in Special Education, Charles Merrill, Columbus, OH, 1984.

Barlow, D.H., M.K. Nock, and M. Hersen, Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change, 3rd ed., Pearson, Boston, MA, 2009.

Kazdin, A.E., Single Case Research Designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings, 2th ed, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2011.

Individual with Disabilities Education Act 2004, Statute Chapter 33, Subchapter I (Part A), Section 1401- Definitions.

https://sites.ed.gov/idea/statute-chapter-33/subchapter-I/1401

De Los Santos, E. and B. Patton, “Making Mathematical Place Value Meaningful for a Special Needs Student”, International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2014, pp. 455-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2014.0057

De Los Santos, E. and B. Patton, “Using Concrete and Abstract Models to Help a Special Needs Third Grader Master Whole Number Addition”, International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, Vol. 5 No. 1, 2016, pp. 787-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2016.0101

De Los Santos, E., “Helping a Special Needs Student Learn Place Value in the Hundreds”, International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, Vol. 6 No. 2, 2017, pp. 1108-1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2017.0137

Downloads

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Santos, E. D. L. (2021). Special Needs Student Developing Automaticity With Multiplication Facts Six to Nine. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(12), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss12.3582
Received 2021-11-08
Accepted 2021-11-19
Published 2021-12-01