Three Decades of Communities of Practice Conceptualization: Revisiting the foundations of Lave and Wenger's constructs and their impact on contemporary learning theory

Flávia Roberta Fernandes; Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva; Glauco Gomes de Menezes; JeanFrank Teodoro Dantas Sartori; João Augusto Wendt Mischiatti

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss4.3732

Authors

Flávia Roberta Fernandes Federal University of Paraná
Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva Federal University of Paraná
Glauco Gomes de Menezes Federal University of Paraná
JeanFrank Teodoro Dantas Sartori Federal University of Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-3756
João Augusto Wendt Mischiatti Federal University of Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss4.3732

Abstract views: 289 /

PDF downloads: 297

Keywords:

Communities of Practice, Etienne Wenger, Jean Lave, CoPs

Abstract

This article aims to identify the key authors and the theoretical foundations’ delineation of Lave and Wenger’s concept of Communities of Practice (CoPs) and its relationship with the learning theory. This exploratory and descriptive study applied a qualitative approach and bibliographic research based on Lave and Wenger’s (1991) publication “Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation”. All 48 references indicated in their research and the perceived relevance the authors have in academia. Data analysis was conducted using bibliometric and content analysis techniques with the aid of the NVivo software. The results showed the relevance of the key authors to the academy based on their number of publications, citation analysis, h-index, fields of study and contributions to those fields. We also identified that the concept of Communities of Practice is interdisciplinarity amongst anthropology, sociology, and psychology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Flávia Roberta Fernandes, Federal University of Paraná

Information Management Masters and PhD Programme
Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva, Federal University of Paraná

Department of Science and Information Management
Glauco Gomes de Menezes, Federal University of Paraná

Department of Science and Information Management
JeanFrank Teodoro Dantas Sartori, Federal University of Paraná

Department of Science and Information Management
João Augusto Wendt Mischiatti, Federal University of Paraná

Department of Science and Information Management

References

ARAUJO, C.A.A., Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais, Em questão, v. 12, n. 1, pp. 11–32, 2006.

BARDIN, L., Análise de conteúdo, Edições 70, São Paulo, SP, 2016.

BARRETO, M.L. et al., Diferenças entre as medidas do índice-h geradas em distintas fontes bibliográficas e engenho de busca, Revista de Saúde Pública, v. 47, pp. 231–238, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102013000100008

BERKELEY ANTHROPOLOGY, William F. Hanks, 2022, available at: https://anthropology.berkeley.edu/william-f-hanks (accessed 05 Feb 2022).

BRASIL. Portal de Periódico Capes/MEC, Acervo: web of science coleção principal, 2020, available at: https://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/?option=com_pcollection&mn=70&smn=79&cid=81 (accessed 1 Fev 2022).

CORREIA, M.F., A constituição social da mente: (re) descobrindo Jerome Bruner e construção de significados. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), v. 8, n. 3, pp. 505–513, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2003000300018

COX, A., What are communities of practice? a comparative review of four seminal works, Journal of Information Science, v. 31, n. 6, pp. 527–540, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505057016

DALKIR, K., Knowledge management in theory and practice. 3 ed., MIT Press, 2017.

DAVYDOV, V. and MARKOVA, A., A concept of educational activity for school children, Soviet Psychology, v. 11, n. 2, pp. 50–76, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405210250

DEBERT, G.G. and ALMEIDA, H.B., Entrevista com Sherry Ortner, Cad. Pagu, n. 27, pp. 427–447, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-83332006000200016

HAYASHI, M.C.P.I. Sociologia da ciência, bibliometria e cientometria: contribuições para a análise da produção científica, in Seminário de Epistemologia e Teorias da Educação, 4. Campinas: Faculdade de Educação/Unicamp, pp. 1–29, 2012.

HIRSCH, J., An index to quantify an individual scientific research output’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 102, n. 46, pp. 16569–16572, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

KIMBLE, C. and HILDRETH, P.M, Communities of Practice: Going One Step Too Far?, in 9e colloque de l’AIM. Evry, France, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.634642

LAVE, J. and WENGER, E., Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

LOTKA, A.J., Statistics: The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy on Sciences, v. 16, n. 12, pp. 317–322, 1926.

MARTINS, G.A. and THEÓPHILO, C.R., Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas, 2. ed., Atlas, São Paulo, SP, 2009.

NVIVO, Powerful Research, Simplified, 2022, available at: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/about/nvivo (accessed 08 Fev 2022).

OMIDVAR, O. and KISLOV, R.,The Evolution of the Communities of Practice Approach, Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 266–275, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492613505908

PAPADOPOULOS, D., Klaus Holzkamp’s critical social science, Theory & Psychology, v. 19, n. 2, pp. 161–166, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103537

PATTINSON, S., PREECE, D. and DAWSON, P., In search of innovative capabilities of communities of practice: A systematic review and typology for future research, Management Learning, v. 47, n. 5, pp. 506–524, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507616646698

PEREIRA, A.P. and OSTERMANN, F., A aproximação sociocultural à mente, de James V. Wertsch, e implicações para a educação em ciências, Ciênc. Educ. (Bauru), v. 18, n. 1, pp. 23–39, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132012000100002

POTTER, W.G., Lotka’s Law revisited, Library Trends, v. 31, pp. 21–39, 1981.

SANTOS, D.M.B., Zygmunt Bauman: vida, obra e influências autorais, Cadernos Zygmunt Bauman, v. 4, n. 8, 2014.

SILVA, F.R.R., Entre a epistemologia e a ontologia: a teoria da estruturação de Anthony Giddens, Tempo Soc., v. 26, n. 2, pp. 123–136, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702014000200008

SILVA, J.A. and BIANCHI, M.L.P., Cientometria: a métrica da ciência, Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), v. 11, n. 21, pp. 5–10, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2001000200002

SMITH, S U., HAYES, S. and SHEA, P.A.A., Critical Review of the Use of Wenger’s Community of Practice (CoP) Theoretical Framework in Online and Blended Learning Research, 2000-2014, Online Learning, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 209–237, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.963

THIRY-CHERQUES, H.R., Pierre Bourdieu: a teoria na prática, Rev. Adm. Pública, v. 40, n. 1, pp. 27–53, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122006000100003

UC SAN DIEGO’S. Division of Social Sciences. Edwin Hutchins, 2022, available at: http://pages.ucsd.edu/~ehutchins/ (accessed 01 Fev 2022).

UCLA PSYCHOLOGY, Faculty Page: Patrícia Greenfield, 2022. available at: https://www.psych.ucla.edu/faculty/page/pmgreen (accessed 01 Fev 2022).

UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, Yrjö Engeström, 2022, available at: https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/persons/yrjö-engeström (accessed 01 Fev 2022).

URBIZAGASTEGUI, R., A produtividade dos autores sobre a Lei de Lotka, Ciência da Informação, v. 37, n. 2, pp. 87–102, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652008000200007

VASCONCELOS, Y.L., Estudos Bibliométricos: Procedimentos Metodológicos e Contribuições, UNOPAR Cient., Ciênc. Juríd. Empres, v. 15, n. 2, pp. 211–220, 2014.

WAINER, J. and VIEIRA, P., Avaliação de bolsas de produtividade do CNPq e medidas bibliométricas: correlações para todas as grandes áreas, Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 60–78, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362013000200005

WEB OF SCIENCE, No Title, 2020, available at: www.webofknowledge.com (accessed 15 Feb 2022).

WENGER, E., Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept, in Blackmore, C. (Ed.), Social Learning Systems and communities of practice, Springer, London, pp. 179-198, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11

WENGER, E., Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann, California, 1987.

WERNECK, A., Segredos e truques do pesquisador outsider-Entrevista com Howard S. Becker, Dilemas-Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 157–171, 2008.