The Research, development and innovation policy in Brazil and the prospects for the development of Industry 4.0 in the Manaus Free Trade Zone

Luiz Frederico Oliveira de Aguiar; Armando Araujo de Souza Junior

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss9.3882

Authors

Luiz Frederico Oliveira de Aguiar Federal University of Amazonas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9106-8996
Armando Araujo de Souza Junior Federal University of Amazonas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2950-1434

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss9.3882

Keywords:

Research, Development and Innovation, Public Policies, Industry 4.0, Manaus Free Trade Zone

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to analyze the Brazilian public policy to promote research, development and innovation and the prospects for Industry 4.0 in the Industrial Pole of Manaus. For this, a documental and bibliographic survey was carried out with the objective of identifying public policies to encourage research, development and innovation in Brazil, as well as the initiatives of the Manaus Free Trade Zone for the development of Industry 4.0. Thus, the correlations between the public policies of the Brazilian government and its local perspectives in the Industrial Pole of Manaus were identified, highlighting that the main currently existing initiatives stem from the mandatory investment in RD&I contained in Brazilian legislation and how important is the participation of the National State for the development of Industry 4.0 initiatives in the Manaus Free Trade Zone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luiz Frederico Oliveira de Aguiar, Federal University of Amazonas

Master's Student of the Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering.

Bachelor in Public Administration from the State University of Amazonas - UEA (2008). He studied EaD Specialization in "Public Policies and Government Management" at UNINTER (2019/2020). He worked as a Parliamentary Advisor at the Legislative Assembly of the State of Amazonas (2009-2010), Administrative and Financial Director of the Youth Secretariat of the Manaus City Hall (2011). Currently a Federal Public Servant (Administrative Agent), with a public examination since 2011, at the Superintendence of the Manaus Free Trade Zone (SUFRAMA) where he works in the General Coordination of Foreign Trade, of which he is the General Coordinator, substitute, working mainly on the following topics: foreign trade, integration of production chains, decentralized international technical cooperation, Mercosur and border development. Master's student in the Graduate Program in Production Engineering - PPGEP at the Federal University of Amazonas - UFAM (2020-2022).
Armando Araujo de Souza Junior, Federal University of Amazonas

Ph.D. Professor of the Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering.

References

Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 189-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3

Akinci, G., & Crittle, J. (2008). Special economic zone: performance, lessons learned, and implication for zone development (No. 45869, pp. 1-83). The World Bank.

Amorim, J. C., Monteiro, A. P., Cepêda, C. L. M., & Coelho, G. R. T. F. (2021). Análise comparativa do regime fiscal das Zonas Francas na Europa. e3-Revista de Economia, Empresas e Empreendedores na CPLP, 7(2), 031-055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29073/e3.v7i2.439

Andreoni, A., & Chang, H. J. (2019). The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural change and economic dynamics, 48, 136-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.10.007

Arbix, G., Salerno, M. S., Zancul, E., Amaral, G., & Lins, L. M. (2017). O Brasil e a nova onda de manufatura avançada: o que aprender com Alemanha, China e Estados Unidos. Novos estudos CEBRAP, 36, 29-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25091/S01013300201700030003

Arbix, G., Miranda, Z., Toledo, D., & Zancul, E. (2018). Made in China 2025 e Industrie 4.0: a difícil transição chinesa do catching up à economia puxada pela inovação. Tempo social, 30, 143-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.144303

Brazil. Decree-law No. 288, of February 28, 1967. Amends the provisions of Law No. 3,173, of June 6, 1957 and regulates the Manaus Free Trade Zone. Official Diary of the Union. section 1, Brasília, DF, February 28, 1967.

Brazil. Law 8,387 of December 30, 1991. Gives new wording to § 1 of art. 3 to arts. 7 and 9 of Decree-Law No. 288, of February 28, 1967, to the caput of art. 37 of Decree-Law No. 1455, of April 7, 1976 and to art. 10 of Law No. 2,145, of December 29, 1953, and other provisions. Official Diary of the Union. section 1, Brasília, DF, December 30, 1991.

Brazil. Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services (MDIC), Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications (MCTIC). Brazilian Expert Perspectives on Advanced Manufacturing in Brazil: An account of workshops held in seven Brazilian capitals in contrast to international experiences. Brasília: MDIC, MCTIC, 2016A. Available at: http://homologa.oic.nap.usp.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/mdicmctic-perspectivasdeespecialistassobreamanufaturaavanadanobrasil-2016-161129012506.pdf. Accessed on: 03/26/2022.

Brazil. Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC). National Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy: 2016-2022: Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic and Social Development. Brasilia: MCTIC, 2016B. Available at: http://www.mctic.gov.br/mctic/export/sites/institucional/arquivos/ASCOM_PUBLICACOES/encti_2016-2022.pdf. Accessed on: 03/26/2022.

Brazil. Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC). Science, Technology and Innovation Plan for Advanced Manufacturing in Brazil (ProFuturo - Production of the Future). Brasilia: MCTIC, 2017A. Available at: https://www.mctic.gov.br/mctic/export/sites/institucional/tecnologia/tecnologias_convergentes/arquivos/Cartilha-Plano-de-CTI_WEB.pdf. Accessed on: 03/26/2022.

Brazil. Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC). National Plan for the Internet of Things. Brasilia: MCTIC, 2017B. Available at: https://www.bndes.gov.br/wps/portal/site/home/knowledge/pesquisaedados/estudos/estudo-internet-das-coisas-iot/estudo-internet--das-coisas-um- plan-of-action-for-brazil. Accessed on: 03/26/2022.

Brazil. Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services (MDIC) Brazilian Agenda for Industry 4.0: Brazil prepared for the challenges of the future. Brasília: MDIC, 2018. Available at: https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/assuntos/industria4-0_cits_ahk.pdf. Accessed on: 03/26/2022.

Brazil. Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations and Communications (MCTIC). National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan for converging and enabling technologies – v.4. Technologies for advanced manufacturing: MCTIC, 2020. Available at: https://antigo.mctic.gov.br/mctic/export/sites/institucional/tecnologia/Categoriadestaque/Arquivo/Plano-de-Acao-em-CTI-Manufatura- Advanced-VF.pdf. Accessed on: 03/26/2022

Beier, G., Ullrich, A., Niehoff, S., Reißig, M., & Habich, M. (2020). Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes–A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 259, 120856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120856

Capda. Committee on Research and Development Activities in the Amazon. Resolution No. 9 of October 29, 2019. Establishes the Priority Programs for Investments in Research and Development. Available at: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolucao-n-9-de-29-de-outubro-de-2019-226220981 Accessed on: 03 Apr 2022.

Costa, V. H. S., Batista, L. S., & Costa, R. A. T. (2020). POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS PARA A CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA: DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO NO BRASIL. Revista Portuguesa Interdisciplinar, 1(01), 01-13.

Davies, R., Coole, T., & Smith, A. (2017). Review of socio-technical considerations to ensure successful implementation of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1288-1295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.256

Diegues, A. C., & Roselino, J. E. (2019). Indústria 4.0 e as redes globais de produção e inovação em serviços intensivos em tecnologia: uma tipologia e apontamentos de política industrial e tecnológica. Instituto de Economia, UNICAMP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5151/iv-enei-2019-6.1-039

Diegues, A. C., & Roselino, J. E. (2021). Política Industrial e Indústria 4.0: a retomada do debate em um cenário de transformações no paradigma tecnoprodutivo. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v19i0.8661724

Elmi, N., Broekaert, K., & Larsen, A. M. E. (2018, January). Agile Governance: Reimagining Policy-Making in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. In White Paper. World Economic Forum, January.

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Strategic challenges for creating knowledge‐based innovation in China: Transforming triple helix university‐government‐industry relations. Journal of Technology management in China.

European Parliament. Industry 4.0. European Union, 2016. Available at: <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/570007/IPOL_STU(2016)570007_EN.pdf.> Accessed on 05 May 2021.

Farr, J., Hacker, J. S., & Kazee, N. (2006). The policy scientist of democracy: The discipline of Harold D. Lasswell. American political science review, 100(4), 579-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062459

Ferreira, V. B. (2018). E-science e políticas públicas para ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil. EDUFBA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788523218652

Gutiérrez, Mirna. Las Zona Francas avanzan rumbo a la era 4.0. Forbes Centroamérica, 27 de jul. de 2020. Available at: < https://forbescentroamerica.com/2020/07/27/zonas-francas-avanzan-cuarta-revolucion-industrial/> Accessed on: 13 june 2021.

Holdren, J. P., Power, T., Tassey, G., Ratcliff, A., & Christodoulou, L. (2012). A National strategic plan for advanced manufacturing. US National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC.

Iedi (Instituto de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento Industrial). Indústria 4.0: A política industrial da Alemanha para o futuro. (2017). Carta IEDI, 1(807), 30.

Iedi (Instituto de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento Industrial). Indústria 4.0: A iniciativa Made in China 2025. (2018) Carta IEDI, 1(827), 38.

Itikawa, M., & Santiago, S. B. (2021). A Systematic Review on Industry 4.0 Maturity Metricsin the Manaus Free Trade Zone. International journal of advanced engineering research and science, 8, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.81.6

Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report of the Industrie, 4(0), 82.

Karre, H., Hammer, M., Kleindienst, M., & Ramsauer, C. (2017). Transition towards an Industry 4.0 state of the LeanLab at Graz University of Technology. Procedia manufacturing, 9, 206-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.006

Kuo, C. C., Shyu, J. Z., & Ding, K. (2019). Industrial revitalization via industry 4.0–A comparative policy analysis among China, Germany and the USA. Global transitions, 1, 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2018.12.001

Labra, E. M. (2015). Vaitsman J, Ribeiro JM, Lobato L. Policy analysis in Brazil. Bristol: University of Bristol; 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015204.00072014

Lucas, L. O., & de Moraes Silva, D. R. La difusión de innovaciones en la estrategia nacional de CT&I en Brasil. Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS), (4), 36-52.

Menelau, S., Macedo, F. G. L., Carvalho, P. L. D., Nascimento, T. G., & Carvalho Júnior, A. D. D. (2020). Mapeamento da produção científica da Indústria 4.0 no contexto dos BRICS: reflexões e interfaces. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 17, 1094-1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174878

Mdic, Minister's office. Ordinance No. 728-SEI, of May 25, 2017. Establishes a Working Group to prepare and propose a National Strategy for Industry4.0 (GTI4.0) - 2017-2022. Available at: https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/20237684/UCEQlTzKXPyVi6cWuD3q0ksQ Accessed on: 03 Apr 2022.

Mdic. Minister's office. Ordinance No. 2091-SEI, of December 17, 2018. Approves the methodology to be adopted in research, development and innovation investments aimed at industry 4.0 in the Manaus Free Trade Zone and creates the Industry 4.0 Seal. Available at: https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/56127454/do1-2018-12-20-portaria-n-2-091-sei-de-17 -de-december-de-2018-56127439 Accessed on: 03 Apr 2022.

Mincit (Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo). Se modifica el régimen de zonas francas. Mincomercio, 15 de mar. De 2021. Available at: < https://www.mincit.gov.co/prensa/noticias/industria/se-modifica-el-regimen-de-zonas-francas> Accessed on: 13 june 2021.

Mogos, M. F., Eleftheriadis, R. J., & Myklebust, O. (2019). Enablers and inhibitors of Industry 4.0: results from a survey of industrial companies in Norway. Procedia Cirp, 81, 624-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.166

Moreira Jr, H. (2016). A política de inovação do Governo Obama como estratégia de recuperação econômica e manutenção da liderança internacional. OIKOS (Rio de Janeiro), 15(2).

Moreira Jr, H. (2020). Indústria 4.0 e novas dimensões tecnológicas no centro da economia-mundo capitalista: perspectivas para o Brasil. OIKOS (Rio de Janeiro), 19(2).

Muraro, L. G., & Castro-Lucas, C. (2021). Os Desafios da estratégia nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação–ENCTI 2016/2022: Federalismo e Política Pública de CT&I no Brasil. Revista de Empreendedorismo, Negócios e Inovação, 6(1), 04-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36942/reni.v6i1.432

Oliveira, J. J. D. (2016). Ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil: poder, política e burocracia na arena decisória. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 24, 129-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987316245907

Ottonicar, S. L. C., Valentim, M. L. P., & Mosconi, E. (2019). Políticas públicas aplicadas à indústria 4.0: estudo comparativo entre o Brasil e o Canadá com foco na competência em informação. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação, 12(2), 558-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v12.n2.2019.19596

Phuyal, S., Bista, D., & Bista, R. (2020). Challenges, opportunities and future directions of smart manufacturing: a state of art review. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100023

Ribeiro, J. M. (2017). O conceito da indústria 4.0 na confeção: análise e implementação (Doctoral dissertation).

Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston consulting group, 9(1), 54-89.

Santos, B. P., Alberto, A., Lima, T. D. F. M., & Charrua-Santos, F. M. B. (2018). Indústria 4.0: desafios e oportunidades. Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento, 4(1), 111-124.

Schwab, K., & Davis, N. (2019). Aplicando a quarta revolução industrial. Edipro.

Suframa, Superintendence of the Manaus Free Zone. Study for the development of an integrated solution for the management of industrial waste in the industrial hub of Manaus. Retrieved from https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/publicacoes/copy_of_newsletter_nr001_pt.pdf, v. 24, 2017.

Suframa. Board of Directors of Suframa - CAS. Resolution No. 40/2018, of May 10, 2018. Disciplines the preparation of projects and the execution of the fulfillment of the investment obligation in research, development and innovation activities in the Western Amazon or in the state of Amapá for Industry 4.0, for the companies that produce computer goods benefited within the scope of the Manaus Free Trade Zone, as well as those that are applied in research, development and innovation through the waiver of a stage in the basic production process provided for in specific Interministerial Ordinances. Manaus: CAS, 2018. Available at: https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/15134973/do1-2018-05-21-resolucao-n-40-de -10-May-2018-15134969#:~:text=Discipline%20a%20designs%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20of%20projects,França%20of%20Manaus%2C%20well%20as. Accessed on: 3 Apr. 2022

Suframa, Performance Indicators of the Industrial Pole of Manaus 2016 – 2021. Available at: https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/publicacoes/indicadores/caderno_indicadores_janeiro_marco_2021_gerado_27-05-2021_.pdf. Accessed on: 20 jun. 2021.

Suframa, Performance Indicators of the Industrial Pole of Manaus 2016 – 2021. Available at: https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/publicacoes/indicadores/caderno_de_indicadores_janeiro_dezembro_2021__gerado_10-02-2022_.pdf. Access on: 05 Mar. 2022

Suframa, SUFRAMA Strategic Planning 2010. Available at: https://www.gov.br/suframa/pt-br/publicacoes/plano_estrategico_suframa_res43cas_07042010.pdf Accessed on: 27 jun. 2021.

Schneegans, S., & Erocal, D. (2015). UNESCO science report: Towards 2030.

Vermulm, R. (2018). Políticas para o desenvolvimento da indústria 4.0 no Brasil.

Velho, L. (2011). Conceitos de ciência e a política científica, tecnológica e de inovação. Sociologias, 13, 128-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222011000100006

Viotti, E. B., & Macedo, M. D. M. (2003). Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil. In Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil (pp. 614-614).

Zhang, C., & Yang, J. (2020). A history of mechanical engineering. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0833-2