Impact of Sociocultural factors on adoption of modern technologies in beekeeping projects among women groups in Kajiado County- Kenya

Authors

  • Peter Njenga Keiyoro University of Nairobi, Kenya
  • B Irungu Muya University of Nairobi, Kenya
  • C. Mwangi Gakuo University of Nairobi, Kenya
  • Mugo K University of Nairobi, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss4.532

Keywords:

Adoption, Beekeeping, Influence, Sociocultural factors, Technology

Abstract

Sociocultural factors can have various impacts in projects during different project phases. These impacts can be either negative or positive. It is important for project implementers who target adoption of technology among people who hold onto certain cultures to understand what their clients believe and consider effective as well as acceptable. This research focused on sociocultural factors influencing adoption of modern technologies in beekeeping projects with particular focus to women beekeeping groups in Kajiado County in Kenya. The objective of the study was to establish the sociocultural factors that influence adoption of modern beekeeping technologies. The target population for this research was the beekeeping women groups in Kajiado County where a sample size of 116 respondents were drawn. The study employed the use of personal interviews, questionnaires, observation guides and key informant interview guides to collect data from the targeted respondents. The collected data was coded and entered into SPSS (version 21) for analysis. The findings of the study revealed that sociocultural factors have a positive and negative influence on adoption of beekeeping technologies. The factors identified were sex of the household head, marital status, size of the house hold, size of land and cultural beliefs. This conclusion confirmed the study carried out by the Kenya Beekeepers Association (K.B.A., 2005) which suggested that some of the sociocultural factors affecting adoption of new technologies could besex of household, marital status and size of the household among others.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Peter Njenga Keiyoro, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Senior lecturer school of continuing and distance education, Department of educational studies. College of education and external studies

  • B Irungu Muya, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Ph.D. Candidate CEES

  • C. Mwangi Gakuo, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Prof of Distance education, CEES

  • Mugo K, University of Nairobi, Kenya

    Ph. D candidate, CEES

References

Bee for development, (2000). Agricultural Extension Black well Science Ltd, UK

Cooper and Schindler (2003) Research methodology and design writing in proposal and thesis writing.47:14-16.

Cramb, R.A. (2003). Processes Affecting the Successful Adoption of New Technologies by Smallholders.In: Hacker, B. (ed). Working with Farmers: The Key to the Adoption of Forage Technologies, pp.11-22. ACIAR Proceedings No. 95. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

Crane, E., (1990). Bees and beekeeping: Science, practice and world resources. Comstock publishing associates (Cornell university press), Ithaca, New York.

Dasgupta, S., (2009). Diffusion of Agricultural Innovations in Village India, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada

Delaplane, A., Kydd, J., Morrison, J. &Uray, I. (2008).A policy agenda for pro-poor agricultural growth. World Development 32(1):73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.012

Demeke, A.B. (2003). "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices in North western Ethiopia." Discussion Paper 37.Institute of Rural Development, University of Goettingen.

District Development Report, (2005) Kajiado. Science and Poverty: An Interdisciplinary Assessment of the Impact of Agricultural Research. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

Ehui Jemal, (2004). Adoption of Beekeeping innovations: its income and gender implications in adamitulu district. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya.

Endrias Geta, (2003). Adoption of Improved Sweet Potato Varieties in Boloso Sore Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. An M. Sc. Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University.

European Commission (1997) The Oslo Manual: The measurement of Scientific and technological activities; Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data.

Feder, G., Just, R.E. &Zilberman, D., 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change, 33: 255-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/451461

GoK, (2004). Second report on poverty in Kenya, Vol.ii.Poverty and social indicators. Nairobi: Ministry of Planning and National Development.Karealem, T.S., Burke, W. J., Freeman, H.A. &Kristjanson, P. (2007). Factors Associated with Farm Households’ Movement Into and Out of Poverty in Kenya: The Rising Importance of Livestock. A paper prepared for the international workshop “Understanding and addressing spatial poverty traps: an international workshop” 29 March 2007, SpierEstate, Stellenbosch, South Africa

KBA., (2005). Kenya Beekeeping Association, fourth annual conference proceedings. Nairobi. Kenya bureau of statistics, 2009 report.

Kigatiira,K.I,and R.A.Morse (1979) The construction, Dimensions and sittings of log hives near Nairobi. Beekeeping in rural Dev, IBRA, London, 1979:p53-58

Kimanji, (2002) Predicting Household Poverty: A Methodological Note with a Kenyan Example Social Sector Division Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis Discussion Paper Series No. 12 Nairobi, Kenya.

Kombo D, Tromp K (2006). Proposal & Thesis Writing. Kenya. Pauline’s publications.

Kukonza, H. &Gordon, A. (2009). Agricultural Marketing in Developing Countries: The role of NGOs and CBOs, Natural Resources Institute

Kurt Lewis (1986): Stochastic Field Theory of Behaviours. Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium, 34. Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki.

Leeuwis, C. (1993) Of Computers, myths and modelling; the social construction of diversty, knowledge, information and communication Technologies in Dutch horticulture and agricultural extension.

Matami, R.M. (2008). The growth of Kenya’s bee keeping industry.

Mbae, R,M (2012) Factors Influencing Implementation of ALLPRO Beekeeping Project in Kajiado and Mwingi Districts .An MBA reaserch project paper, Kenyatta University

Mwabu, G., Kimenyi, M.S., Kimalu, P., Nafula, N.&Manda, K. D. (2002) Predicting Household Poverty: A Methodological Note with a Kenyan Example Social Sector Division Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis Discussion Paper Series No. 12 Nairobi, Kenya.

Nafula, H.T. (2008) Adoption and Diffusion of beekeeping apiculture in Kenya; An empirical study carried out in the Centre, Southwest and Northwest Provinces.

Paterson,P.D(.2006).The tropical agriculturist. Macmillan Publishers limited (2006)

Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of innovations, fifth edition. Free Press, New York, U.S.A.

Spielman, J. (2005) Innovation Systems Perspectives on Developing-Country Agriculture: A Critical Review. ISNAR Discussion Paper 2.

World Bank (2007) Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to go beyond the strengthening of research systems. Washington DC, USA: World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-01

How to Cite

Keiyoro, P. N., Muya, B. I., Gakuo, C. M., & K, M. (2016). Impact of Sociocultural factors on adoption of modern technologies in beekeeping projects among women groups in Kajiado County- Kenya. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 4(4), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss4.532