The social Influence on Students’ Interest and engagement with Science Studies in Tanzanian Secondary Schools

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss9.585

Keywords:

students, interest, persistence, engagement, science studies

Abstract

The development of interest and engagement in science studies among junior learners is shaped by many factors within their learning environment, one of them being the social influence. However, in practice it has not been clear how such influence shapes learners’ interests and engagement in science studies. This study examined the social influences and their impact on students’ interest and engagement in science. The study was mainly a qualitative research involving teachers, parents, and students. The findings revealed that students’ interests and engagement in science studies were mainly shaped by multi-influences from different social groups including: peers, family members, senior students, subject teachers, and career advisors/counsellors. The findings suggest that there is a need to monitor and control the available social influences on leaners’ interests in science because not all influences seemed to be positive, as some of them are negatively influencing the learners’ interests, persistence, and engagement in science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • John Fungulupembe Kalolo, Mkwawa University College of Education, Tanzania

    A lecturer of policy and curriculum studies, and science education at Mkwawa University college of education (a constituent college of the university of Dar es Salaam), Iringa, Tanzania

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2004). Questions raised by a reasoned action

approach: comment on Ogden (2003).

Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995

Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113-1127.

Barber, J., N. Parizeau, and L. Bergman. (2002). Spark your child's success in

math and science: Practical advice for parents. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved on January 3, 2015 from www. lawrencehallofscience.org/gems/GEMSpark.html.

Baumrind, D. (1991). Parenting styles and adolescent development. In J. Brooks-

Gunn, R. Lerner & A. C. Peterson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 746–758). New York: Garland.

Cobb, N.J. (2001). Adolescence: Continuity, change and diversity. (4th ed.),

London: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Chonjo, P. N., Osaki, K. M., Possi, M. & Mrutu, S. (1996). Improving science

education in secondary schools: A situational analysis of selected government secondary schools in Tanzania mainland. Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Cotton, K., & Wikelund. K. R. (2001). Parent involvement in education. School

Improvement Research Series. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved on January 3, 2015 from www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/3/cu6.html.

Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the

children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701–712.

Epstein, J. L. (2005). School-initiated family and community partnerships. In T.Erb (Ed.), This we believe in action: Implementing successful middle level schools (pp. 77–96). Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.

Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, community, and community partnerships: Your

handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Epstein, J. L., Simon, B. S., & Salinas, K. C. (1997). Involving parents in home

work in the middle grades (Rep. No. 18). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research.

Fan, X. T., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students' academic

achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020

action approach. Taylor & Francis.

Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., Albarracin, D., & Hornik, R. (2007). A reasoned action

approach: Some issues, questions, and clarifications (pp. 281-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

Henderson, A. T., and K. L. Mapp. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact

of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Accessed on January 3, 2015 from www.sedl.org/connections/resources/evidence.pdf;

Hixon, J. (2006). Critical issues supporting ways parents and families can

/becomes involved in schools. Cambridge: Harvard Family Research Project.

Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making:

Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative science quarterly, 277-303.

Jackson, A., & Davis., P. G. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents

in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.

Montano, D. E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2008). Theory of reasoned action, theory of

planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice, 4, 67-95.

Munro, M. & Elsom, D. (2000). Choosing science at 16, NICEC project report.

NICEC, Cambridge

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development -Global Science

Forum-OECD-GSF (2006). Evolution of Student Interest in Science and Technology Studies Policy Report. OECD: Paris

Omari, I.M. (1995). University of verge of maturity or immaturity towards

cooperate excellence. A paper presented at the University of Dar es Salaam, Silver Jubilee, 1970-1995.

Parent Teacher Association (PTA). 1999). Position statement. Parent/family

involvement: Effective parent involvement programs to foster student success. Accessed from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/parents.aspx on 24th March 2016.Pate, P. E., and P.G. Andrews. (2006). Research summary: Parent involvement.

Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association (NMSA). Accessed on January 3, 2015 from www.nmsa.org/Research/ResearchSummaries/ Parentalinvolvement/tabid/274/Default.aspx.

UR.T. (2007). Education and Training Policy. Ministry of Education Culture, Dar

es Salaam

Van Voorhis, F. L. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on

family involvement and science achievement. The Journal of Education Research, 96, 323–338.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

Kalolo, J. F. (2016). The social Influence on Students’ Interest and engagement with Science Studies in Tanzanian Secondary Schools. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 4(9), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss9.585