Image Quality Assessment and Radiation exposure in Intra Oral Dental Radiography

Authors

  • Mohamed Hamed Nassef King Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol5.iss2.623

Keywords:

Dental radiography Radiation Exposure, Quality control, Image Quality Assessment

Abstract

In this study, an intra oral dental unit (Siemens-70) at King Abdul Aziz University (KAU) Dental Hospital was selected and investigated for visual image quality assessment and radiation protection purposes. Radiation dosimetry for determining the optimum image quality with the lowest radiation exposure to the patient was carried out. A DXTTR dental radiography trainer phantom head and neck, portable survey meter Model RAD EYE-B20, and radiation dosimetry system RADCAL Acuu-pro were used in this study. RADCAL Accu-pro is a non-invasive kV system, reliable instruments to measure and diagnose all X-ray machines including dental units. The radiation exposure to patients in (mGy) was measured using RADCAL ionization chamber Model 10×6-6. The best image quality with the lowest exposure dose was assessed for conventional intraoral X-ray film (Kodak type E) and the digital processing sensor (RVG 5200). Radiation survey level was done during this study for safety and protection purposes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mohamed Hamed Nassef, King Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia

    Nuclear Engineering Department, King Abdul-Aziz University, Faculty of Engineering,
    Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority” (NRRA), Cairo-Egypt

References

Looe H.K., Pfaffenberger A., Chofor N., Eenboom F., Sering M., Ruhmann A., Poplawski A., WillbornK., and Poppe B, “Radiation exposure to children in intraoral dental radiology”, Radiation protection dosimetry, Vol. 121, Issue 4,461-465, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl071

Elli K., Ioannis T., Panagiotis G., Evripides S., Evangelos G., and Emmanouel Y, “Exploring the usefulexposure range limits of three intraoral image receptors for various tube potential, tube current and exposure time settings’, Health, Vol.3, No.5, 292-229, 2011.[3]United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation. Sources and effect of ionizingradiation, Report 2000, Vol. 1, UNSCEAR publications, 2000.

Mortazavi S.M., Shareghi A., Ghiassi-Nejad M., Kavousi A., Jafari-Zadeh M., Nazeri F., andMozdarani H, “The need for national diagnostic reference levels: entrance surface dose measurement in intraoral radiography’, Iran. J. Radiat. Res, Vol 2(3), 127-133, 2004.

Tomohiro Okano, “Radiation dose and protection in dentistry”, Review article, Japanese dental sciencereview, Vol. 46, 112-121, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2009.11.004

Mohammad T., Fateme A., and Shahram B, “Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dentalexamination”, Acta medica Iranica, Vol. 50, No. 12, 809-813, 2012.

Kallirroy S., George P., and Nicolas P, “A quality assurance program in dental radiographic units inwestern Greece”, OOOE,Vol. 99, 622-627, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.033

Syriopoulos K., Velders XL., Van der Stelt PF., Van Ginkel FC., and Tsiklakis K, “Mail survey ofdental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece”, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology,Vol 27,321-328, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600385

Eskandarlou A., Ghazi-Khanlou Sani K., and Mehdizadeh A.R, “Radiation protection principlesobservance in Iranian dental schools”, Iran. J. Radiat. Res, Vol 8 (1), 51-57, 2010. [10]Teunen D, “The European Directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizingradiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/EURATOM)”, 18(2), 133-137, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/18/2/009

Poppe B., Looe H.K., Pfaffenberger A., Eenboom F., Chofor N., Sering M., Ruhmann A., PoplawskiA., and Willborn K, “Radiation exposure and dose evaluation in intraoral dental radiology”, Radiation protection dosimetry, Vol. 13,1-6, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl113

Williams JR., and Montgomery A, “Measurement of dose in panoramic dental radiolog: Shortcommunication”, The British journal of radiology, Vol. 73, pp 1002-1006, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.873.11064656

Kristina H., and Mats N, “The effects on absorbed dose distribution in intraoral X-ray imaging whenusing tube voltages of 60 and 70 kV for Bitewing imaging”, Journal of oral and maxillofacial research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1-6, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2013.4302

Lotf A., Elias B., Halimah M., Sidek A., and Nahid S, “Measurement of testis absorbed dose in somecommon medical x-ray examinations using a Rando phantom”, IOSR journal of applied physics, Vol. 2, Issue 5, 54-56, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/4861-0255456

James R., DDS MS., Jerald O., DMD MS., Detroit M., Kansas C, “Radiation dose reductiontechniques in north American dental schools”, Oral surgery oral medicine oral pathology, Vol. 93, 496-505, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.121387

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), standard guides, Safety Series No.115, IAEA, Vienna,1996.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-01

How to Cite

Nassef, M. H. (2017). Image Quality Assessment and Radiation exposure in Intra Oral Dental Radiography. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 5(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol5.iss2.623