Exploring Traits of High-Performing, High-Poverty Schools

Jerilou J. Moore; Aubrey Womack; P. Renee Hill-Cunningham

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss5.1030

Authors

Jerilou J. Moore University of Mississippi, USA
Aubrey Womack University of Mississippi, USA
P. Renee Hill-Cunningham University of Mississippi, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss5.1030

Keywords:

High-Poverty, High Performing, school traits

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a significant increase in pressure placed on schools across the nation due to high-stakes accountability policies (Klar, 2014). It comes as no surprise that low performing schools feel constant pressure to raise the measured academic performance of all students. Rarely, do low-performing schools who have overcome challenging circumstances in order to increase academic achievement, get spotlighted. Educators need to identify the common factors attributed to increased student achievement. This can be achieved by examining the lessons and examples of high-performing schools so that all schools can succeed regardless of circumstances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jerilou J. Moore, University of Mississippi, USA

Professor, School of Education
Aubrey Womack, University of Mississippi, USA

Graduate Student, School of Education
P. Renee Hill-Cunningham, University of Mississippi, USA

Assistant Professor

References

Chenoweth, K., & Theokas, C. (2013). How high-poverty schools are getting it done. Educational Leadership, 70(7), 56-59.

Chenoweth, K. (2015). Teachers matter. Yes. Schools matter. Yes. Districts matter — really? Phi Delta Kappan, 97(2), 14-20. doi:10.1177/0031721715610085

Chenoweth, K (2009). How it’s being done: Urgent lessons from unexpected schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Chenoweth, K. (2009). It can be done, it's being done, and here's how. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(1), 38-43.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Concentration of Public School Students Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clb.asp

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Duncan, G. J., & Murnane, R. J. (2014). Meeting the educational challenges of income inequality. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(7), 50-54. doi:10.1177/003172171409500712

Hayes, S. (2009). Roots of success: Effective practices in Vermont schools. Vermont Department of Education, 1-62. Retrieved from https://rootsofsuccess.wordpress.com/

Johnson, S.M., Kraft, M.A., & Papay, J.P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.

Klar, H., & A. Brewer, C. (2014). Successful leadership in a rural, high-poverty school: The case of county line middle school. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(4), 422-445. doi:10.1108/JEA-04-2013-0056

Leithwood, K., Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation, 1-87. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/

Parrett, W. H., & Budge, K. M. (2012). Turning high-poverty schools into high-performing schools. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.apastyle.org/manual/

Rutherford, A. S., Hillmer, T., & Parker, A. (2011). Overcoming the education challenge of poverty in the mississippi delta. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 40-43. doi:10.1177/003172171109300310