Dimensions of Principals’ Characteristics for Improving Efficiency of Schools
Main Article Content
Abstract
The quality of education could be improved by promoting the internal efficiency of secondary schools, which largely depends on leadership skills of the principals. Principals today function as instructional leaders, who continuously struggle for promoting learning outcomes of pupils, understand curriculum content and instructional skills and motivate teachers to improve these skills by providing them professional and instructional support. Their instructional leaderships could be improved by knowledge of curriculum content and modern teaching methodologies, which promote the internal efficiency of schools. The principals benefit from each other in professional matters and promote collegiality among them. They interact with their colleagues to share knowledge and skills. The experienced principals are good mediators and conflict resolvers. They collaborate with parents and community for improving learning outcomes of students. Administrative competence is important in determining the performance of the best and worst schools. But it is hard to measure it directly. Years of administrative skills and planning are also relevant to competence, but are less likely to be available on any consistent basis and affect the internal efficiency of school. The education level of the principal must ensure that he is an excellent evaluator of the classroom and school objectives. He checks students’ work and gives feedback to teachers after classroom observations. Professional development of principals has an impact on the knowledge, skills and their dispositions. The professional development need of principal is somewhat different from those of teachers and is reflective of the four major categories of development: leadership skills, curriculum related (Instructional, supervision and evaluation) skills, human and financial resource management skills, and knowledge in using departmental rules and regulations. Effective supervision and good governance is affected by number of teachers in a school. Small number of teachers in school ensures close contact between principal and teachers, which makes monitoring and financial accountability more effective, resultantly promotes its efficiency.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
References
Adeboyeje, R.A. (2000). A practical approach to effective utilization and maintenance of physical facilities in secondary schools. In fadipe, J.O. and Oluchukwu E.E. (Eds) Educational planning and administration in Nigeria in the 21st century. Ondo: NIEPA. Pp.88-103, Nigeria.
Amorim, Ana Cristina Accioly de. (2008). Literacy and Numeracy in Select Countries in
the Caribbean. Draft for Discussion, Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), West Indies.
Chapman, D. W. (2000) ‘Trends in educational administration in developing Asia.’ Educational Administration Quarterly, 36: 283-308, Ghana. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610021968985
Cranston, N. C. (2002). School based management, leaders and leadership: change and challenges for principals, International Studies in Educational Administration, 30(1): 2-12, South Africa.Fullan, Micheal. (2003). The Moral Imperative of school leadership: A discussion Document. Ontario Principals’ Council and Corwin Press, Canada.
Hallinger, P. and Murphy, G. (1985) Assessing the Instructional Management Behaviour of Principals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461445
Kerr, T. (2009). The role of school principal. Titusville Area School District. Titusville: PA, USA.
Meier, D. W. (1996). The big benefits of smallness. Educational Leadership, 54, 12-15, USA.
Stein, M.K., Nelson, B.S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25 (4): 423-448, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004423
StGermain, L., Quinn, D.M. (2005). Investigation of tacit knowledge in principal leadership. The Educational Forum, 70(1): 75-90, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984873
Van Wyck, N. (2001) ‘Perceptions and practices of discipline in urban black schools in South Africa,’ South African Journal of Education, 21(3): 195- 201, South Africa.
Zaccaro, S.J., Kemp, C., Bader, P. (2004). Leader traits and attributes in Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A.T., Sternberg, R.J. (Eds). The Nature of Leadership. Sage Publications: London, UK.