Online Forum
A Platform that Affects Students’ Learning?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss11.272Keywords:
online forum, learning ease, learning satisfaction, learning experience, active learning, independent learningAbstract
In the current era of globalization, constant and perpetual advances in information technology are reshaping learning styles and the way students learn in higher education. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the usage of online forums as a platform and learning tool. It also investigated how online forum affected students’ learning, particularly in active learning and independent learning. A survey was conducted amongst 113 business foundation students from a private university in Malaysia. The study found that learning experience and learning satisfaction gained from online forum influence both active learning and independent learning. Conversely, learning ease only affects active learning and not independent learning. These findings draw attention to facets of online forums, which could have an impact on how instructors transfer knowledge and how students learn.
References
Ali, R., & E. M. Leeds. (2009). The Impact of Face-to-Face Orientation on Online Retention: A Pilot Study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4).
Althaus, S. (1997). Computer-Mediated Communication in the University Classroom: An Experiment with On-Line Discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379088
Anderson, T. (1996). The virtual conference: Extending professional education in cyberspace. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2 (2/3), 121–135.
Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (1997). On-line forums: New platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00078.x
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290002400104
Arbaugh, J. B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 203–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00049-4
Baker, D. L. (2011). Designing and orchestrating online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7 (3), 401 – 411.
Bates, A.W. (1995) Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. Routledge, London.
Benson, B., & G. Samarawickrema. (2009). “Addressing the Context of Elearning: Using Transactional Distance Theory to Inform Design.” Distance Education, 30, 5–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845972
Bonwell, C. C. & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. I. Washington, DC.
Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379159
Braun, T. (2008). Making a Choice: The Perceptions and Attitudes of Online Graduate Students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 63–92.
Condon, S. L., & Cech, C. G. (1996). Discourse management strategies in face-to-face and computer mediated decision making interaction. Electronic Journal of Communication/LA Revue Electronique de Communication, 6(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.07con
Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In D. Oblinger & J. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation, 228−248. EDUCAUSE.
DeSanctis, G., Fayard, A., Roach, M. & Jiang, L. (2003). Learning in Online Forums. European Management Journal, 21 (5), 565 – 577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00106-3
Dillon, A. & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68 (3), 322 – 349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003322
Edmonds, K. (2010). Understanding the Perspectives of Online Graduate Students: Implications for Educational Leaders. http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47706/1/Edmonds 2010.pdf.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer
conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Garrison, D. R. & Hanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.
Gerlock, J. A. & McBride, D. L. (2013). Managing Online Discussion Forums: Building Community by Avoiding the Drama Triangle. College Teaching, 61, 23–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2012.713042
Geer, R. (2005). Imprinting and its impact on online learning communities. In H. Goss (Ed.), Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: Proceedings of the 22nd ASCILITE Conference, pp. 231-240.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Chapter 1: Blended learning system: Definition, current trends, future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of Blended Learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Greening, T. (1998) Building the Constructivist Toolbox: An Exploration of Cognitive Technologies. Educational Technology, 37 (2), 23–35.
Hammond, M. (1999). Issues associated with participation in online forums—the case of the communicative learner. Education and Information Technologies, 4 (4), 353–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009661512881
Hammond, M. (2005). A Review of Recent Papers on Online Discussion in Teaching and Learning in
Higher Education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9 (3).
Harasim, L. M. (1989). Online education as a new domain. In R. Mason & A. R. Kaye (Eds.). Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education, 50–62. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Harrington, H. (1992) Fostering Critical Reflection through Technology: Preparing Prospective Teachers for a Changing Society. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. 1 (1), 67–82.Hidden Curriculum (2014). In S. Abbott (Ed.), The Glossary of Education Reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0962029920010105
Jahnke, J. (2010). Student perceptions of the impact of online discussion forum participation on learning outcomes. Journal of Learning Design, 3 (2), 27 – 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v3i2.48
Jenkins, H. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century: An occasional paper on digital media and learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2007-01-03
Lee, S. J., S. Srinivasa, T. Trail, D. Lewis, & S. Lopez. (2011). Examining the Relationship among Student Perception of Support, Course Satisfaction, and Learning Outcomes in Online Learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 158–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001
Liu, E. Z., Cheng, S. & Lin, C. H. (2013). The Effects of Using Online Q & A Discussion Forums with Different Characteristics as a Learning Resource. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 22 (4), 667 – 675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0072-2
Lombardi, J., & McCahill, M. (2004). Enabling social dimensions of learning through a persistent, unified, massively multi-user, and self-organizing virtual environment. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (C5’04). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/C5.2004.1314386
McCreary, E. K. (1990). Three behavioral models for computer-mediated communication. In L. M.
Harasim (Ed.), Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment, 117–130. New York: Praeger.
McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P R., Yi-Guang, L., & Smith, D. A. F. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: Regents of the University of Michigan.
Moore M.G. & Kearsley G. (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View, 2nd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Prinsen, F., Volman, M. L. L.; Terwel, J. (2007). The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a CSCL environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (6), 1037–1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00692.x
Ross, J.,& Smythe, E. (1995). Differentiating cooperative learning to meet the needs of gifted learners: A case for transformational leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 63-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329501900105
Rowntree, D. (1995) Teaching and Learning Online: a Correspondence Education for the 21st Century? British Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (3), 205–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.1995.tb00342.x
Ruberg, L.F., Moore, D.M. & Taylor, C.D. (1996) Student Participation. Interaction, and Regulation in a Computer-Mediated Communication Environment: a Qualitative Study. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 14 (3), 243–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/7PPF-FQBJ-1RJM-CACT
Salmon, G. (2000). Computer mediated conferencing for management learning at the open university. Management Learning, 31, 491–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600314005
Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52 (3), 543–553.Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2009). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education, (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Sit, J. W.H., Chung, J. W.Y., Chow, M. C. M & Wong, T. K.S. (2005). Experiences of online learning:
students’ perspective. Nurse Education Today, 25, 140–147.
Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, 265, 116–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0991-116
Straus, S.G. & McGrath, J.E. (1994) Does the Medium Matter? The Interaction of Task Type and Technology on Group Performance and Member Reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (1), 87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.87
Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. & Yeh, D. (2007). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
Thurmond, V. A., Wambach, K., & Connors, H. R. (2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 169–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_4
Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 (3), 351 – 366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.03800.x
Tirrell, T., & Quick, D. (2012). Chickering’s Seven Principles of Good Practice: Student Attrition in Community College Online Courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36, 580–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920903054907
Willis, J. (1991) Computer Mediated Communication Systems and Intellectual Teamwork: Social Psychological Issues in Design and Implementation. Educational Technology, 31 (4), 10–20.
Wu, D. & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting Learning from Asynchronous Online Discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8 (2), 139 – 152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i2.1832
Yukselturk, E., & S. Bulut. (2007). “Predictors for Student Success in an Online Course.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10, 71–83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Premagowrie Sivanandan, Kalai Vaani Rajandram, Ho Ree Chan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
