Non-traditional Security Disputes of Sri Lanka

Authors

  • Jeewaka Saman Kumara University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss3.323

Abstract

From the 1970s onwards, social constructivists criticized the intense narrowing of the field of security studies imposed by the military and nuclear obsessions of the Cold War. Further, they argued that these traditional issues have not disappeared, but that other, non-military sources of threat now seemed more pressing. Hence, the nature and magnitude of security within the states should be considered from different angles such as economic security, food security, health security, environmental security, personal security, community security and political security. In the context of small states, the issue of security has multiple dimensions in the complexities of the state. Apart from the traditional aspect of security threats of small states, the non-traditional aspect is very important to identify the security threats of small states. One of the most important aspects of non-traditional security thus, is that people should be able to live in a society that honours their political security. In this broader context this study makes an effort to answer whether the political security of Sri Lanka is being challenged in the context of power political paradigm. Further the research problem has been answered by using standard research tool including descriptive and analytical methods and also the research involves both qualitative and quantitative methods. As a developing small state, Sri Lanka is an electoral democracy. The 1978 constitution vested strong executive powers in the president, who is directly elected for a six-year term and can dissolve Parliament. The prime minister heads the leading party in Parliament but otherwise has limited powers. The 225-member unicameral legislature is elected for a six-year term through a mixed proportional-representation system. Elections are open to multiple parties, and fair electoral laws and equal campaigning opportunities ensure a competitive political process. Despite the war’s completion and an improvement in security throughout Sri Lanka, the situation of political security remained grim. Some observers’ charge that centralizes approach of the ruling party of the Government of Sri Lanka has led to a lack of protection of political security. In this broader context, there is an argument that the situation of political security of Sri Lankan remains grim.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jeewaka Saman Kumara, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

    Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science

References

Al. Mashat, Abdul-Monem M. (1985), National Security in the Third World, Boulder: Westview.

Allles, A. C. (1976), Insurgency 1971, Colombo: No Publisher.

Ameerdeen, Vellaithamby (2006), Ethnic Politics of Muslims in Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka: Centre for Minority Studies.

Anderson, Benedict (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, London: No Publisher.

Arasaratnam, Sinnappah (1969), Ceylon, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Bandarage, Asoka (2009), The Separatist Conflict in Sri Lanka: Terrorism Ethnicity, Political Economy, Colombo: Vijitha Yapa Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203886311

Bandarage, Asoke (1983), Colonialism in Sri Lanka: The Political Economy of the Kandyan Highlands 1833-1886, Berlin: Helm. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110838640

Bardalai, A. K. (2006), Changing Security Scenario, New Delhi: Knowledge World.

Azar, Edward E and Chung-in Moon (1988), “Rethinking Third World National Security” in Edward E. Azar & Chung-in Moon (eds.), National Security in the Third World: The Management of Internal and External Threats, England: Hants.

Barston, Ronald P. (1973), “Introduction”, in Ronald P. Barston (ed.), The Other Powers: Studies in the Foreign Policies of Small States, New York: Barnes & Noble.

Bastiampillai, Bentram E. S. J. (1990), “Ethnic Conflicts in South Asia and Inter-State Relations especially in Relation to Sri Lanka”, in Shelton U. Kodikara (ed.), South Asian Strategic Issues: Sri Lankan Perspectives, New Delhi: Saga Publications.

Bauwens, Knudsen W. and O. F. Clesse (eds.) (1996), Small States and the Security Challenge in the New Europe, London: Brassey’s.

Berkwitz, Morton and P.G. Bock (eds.), (1965), American National Security, New York: Free Press.

Fischer, Dietrich (1993), Nonmilitary Aspect of Security: A System Approach, Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.

Fox, Annette Baker (1959), The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War II, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Ganguly, Rajat (2004), “Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Conflict: At a Crossroad between Peace and War”, Third World Quarterly, 25(5): 903-917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000232018

Gunaratna, Rohan (1997), “Internationalization of the Tamil Conflict and its Implication”, South Asia, 30(Special Issue): 119-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00856409708723307

Halftendorn, Helga (1991), “The Security Puzzle: Theory-Building and Discipline-Building in International Security”, International Studies Quarterly, 35(1): 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600386

Hellman-Rajanayagam, Dagmar (1986), “The Tamil ‘Tigers’ in Northern Sri Lanka: Origins, Factions, Programmes”, Internationals Asian forum, 17(1-2): 63-85.

Hendrickson, David (2002), “Towards Universal Empire: The Dangerous Quest for Absolute Security”, World Policy Journal, 19(3): 01-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-2002-4003

Herz, John H. (1950), “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”, World Politics, 2(2): 157-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187

Hubbell, L. Kenneth (1987), “The Devolution of Power in Sri Lanka”, Asian Survey, 27(11): 1176-1187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2644721

Jakobsen, Peter Viggo (2009), “Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP” Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1): 81-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01833.x

Ullman, Richard H. (1983), “Redefining Security”, International Security, 8(1): 129-153.Uyangoda, Jayadeva (2003), “Beyond Negotiations: Towards Transformative Peace in Sri Lanka,” Marga, 01(1): 58-68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538489

Vandenbosch, Amry (1964), “The Small States in International Politics and Organization”, The Journal of Politics, 26(2): 293-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2127598

Walt, Stephen M. (1991), “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 35(2): 211-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600471

Weerasinghe, Asoka (1988), “Tamil Tragedy in Sri Lanka”, Economic and Political Weekly, 23(42): 2186-2188.

Wiberg, Hakan (1987), “The Security of Small Nations: Challenges and Defences”, Journal of Peace Research, 24 (4): 339-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338702400403

Williams, Marc (1993), “Re-articulating the Third World Coalition: The Role of the Environment Agenda”, Third World Quarterly, 14(1): 27-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599308420311

Wolfers, Arnold (1952), “National Security’ as an Ambiguous Symbol”, Political Science Quarterly, 67(4): 481-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2145138

Downloads

Published

2015-03-01

How to Cite

Kumara, J. S. (2015). Non-traditional Security Disputes of Sri Lanka. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss3.323