Blackboard Use by Faculty Members in the Colleges of Applied Sciences in the Sultanate of Oman

Main Article Content

Salim Abdullah Al Naibi
Kamal Basha Madarsha
Nik Ahmad Ismail

Abstract

This research was conducted to investigate the use of Blackboard by faculty members in the Colleges of Applied Sciences in the Sultanate of Oman and the factors affecting their use. A questionnaire was completed online by 257faculty members representing 43.05% of the total faculty population in these colleges. Results showed that Blackboard is still underutilized by faculty; it is mainly used as a depositary tool rather than for instructional and assessment purposes. Results also revealed that there are statistically significant differences in Blackboard use related to age, experience, specialization and college. However, other demographic variables (i.e. gender and academic rank) had no effect on Blackboard usage. Technology infrastructure and faculty support were identified as being the major factors leading to limited use of Blackboard in these colleges. It is recommended that immediate action be taken to address these issues; it is further recommended that additional research be undertaken to investigate student and faculty characteristics that relate to Blackboard usage.

Article Details

Section

Journal Articles

Author Biographies

Salim Abdullah Al Naibi, College of Applied Sciences, Sultanate of Oman

Ministry of Higher Education

Kamal Basha Madarsha, International Islamic University, Malaysia

Unit Head ICT, Department of Curriculum & Instruction

Nik Ahmad Ismail, International Islamic University, Malaysia

Dean Kulliyyah of Education

How to Cite

Al Naibi, S. A., Madarsha, K. B., & Ismail, N. A. (2015). Blackboard Use by Faculty Members in the Colleges of Applied Sciences in the Sultanate of Oman. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(4), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss4.345

References

Al-Musawi, A. & Abdelraheem, A. (2004). E-learning at Sultan Qaboos University: status and future. British Journal of Educational Technology 35 (3), 363–367. Al-Musawi, A. (2007). Current status of educational technologies at Omani higher education institutions and their future prospective. Educational Technology Research and Development 55 (4), 395–411. Al-Senaidi, S., Lin. L, & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education 53 (3), 575–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00394.x

Bradford, P., Porciello, M., Balkon , N., & Backus, D. (2007). The Blackboard Learning System. The Journal of Educational Technology Systems 35, 301-314. URL: http://www.gilfuseducationgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/learning-management-system-Blackboard.pdf . Accessed on 12/01/2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/X137-X73L-5261-5656

Cuneo, C., Campbell, B. & Harnish, D. (2002, April). The integration and effectiveness of ICTs in Canadian postsecondary education. Paper presented at the 2002 Pan-Canadian Education Research Agenda Symposium, Montreal, Quebec. URL: http://www.cesc.ca/pceradocs/2002/papers/CCuneo_OEN.pdf . Accessed on 09/01/2015. Cunnane, S. (2010, August 12). Students 'let down' by the academic luddites. Times Higher Education. URL: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/412958.article. Accessed on 11/03/2015. D'Silva, R., & Reeder, K. (2005). Factors that influence faculty members’ uptake and continued use of course management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1071-1073.

El Zawaidy, H. (2014). Using Blackboard in online learning at Saudi universities: faculty member's perceptions and existing obstacles. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 3(7), 141-150. Eldridge, B. (2014). Exploring faculty adoption and utilization of Blackboard at a community college in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System. Theses and Dissertations-- Educational Policy Studies and Evaluation. Paper 24. URL: http://www.cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/TLC/article/viewFile/1132/1116. Accessed on 11/03/2015.

Frimpon, F. (2012). Re-structuring of the critical success factors for e-learning deployment. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2 (3), 115-127.Jegede, P. (2008). ICT attitudinal characteristics and use level of Nigerian teachers. Issues in Information Science and Information Technology, 5, 261-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/1008

Nicholson, K., Tokman, M., & Maniscalco , T. (2014). Faculty Feedback on Blackboard Course Management System. URL: http://acadtech.cit.cornell.edu/files/2014/08/FacultyBbFinalReport-17zixco.pdf. Accessed on 12/03/2015.

Selim, H. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49, 396-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004

Sutton, S., McCoy, S. & Pfaffman, J. (2010). Effective uses for Blackboard: Do students and faculty have a shared vision for how Blackboard should be used to support instruction? In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, 3361-3366. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Taylor, G. Maynard, L., Askwig, J., & Heikkinen, N. (2010). Making Blackboard accessible to Students, Faculty, and Staff Campus-wide. URL:http://www.hu.mtu.edu/~ncheikki/pdffiles/RecommendationReport.pdf. Accessed On 09/01/2015

Weber, A. (2010). Web-Based Learning in Qatar and the GCC States. Center for International and Regional Studies, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar. Occasional Paper No. 5. Wood, R., Baker, J., & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 4th Quarter 2004, 281–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.09.002

Yi, M. & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning good orientation, and technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9