Automated Analysis of Spoken Language

A Gender Comparison

Authors

  • Terry Hallett University of Akron, USA
  • James Steiger University of Akron, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss5.353

Abstract

We studied the number of words spoken by adult males versus females throughout a six-hour day and during three structured monologues. The six-hour samples were captured and analyzed using an automated speech monitoring and assessment system. The three monologues required different language tasks, and analyses of syntactic and semantic complexity were performed for each. There were no significant gender differences except during a reminiscent monologue when males spoke significantly more words and sentences than females. These results conflict with past research and popular (mis)conceptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cohen, S.J. (2009). Gender differences in speech temporal patterns detected using lagged co-occurrence text-analysis of personal narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 111-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9088-9

Guiller, J. & Durndell, A. (2006). ‘I totally agree with you’: Gender interactions in educaitonal online discussion groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 368-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00184.x

Lakoff, R.T. (1975). Language and women's place. New York: NY: Harper & Row.

Mulac, A. Bradac, J.J. & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender as culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female differences. Human Communication Research, 27, 121-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/27.1.121

Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. NY: Oxford University Press.

Bilous, F. R. & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accomodation in the conversational behaviors of same and mixed gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 183-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(88)90016-X

Labov, W. (1990). Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, R.T. (1977). Women's language. Language and Style, 10, 222-247.

Thomson, R. & Murachver, T. (2001). Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 193-208.[10] Tannen, D. (1996). Researching gender-related patterns in classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 341-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164812

Anderson, K.J. & Leaper, C. (1998). Emotion talk between same and mixed gender friends. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 419-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X980174001

Crosby. F. & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypothesis. Language in Society, 6, 313-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005030

Macaulay, M. (2001). Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 293-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00129-0

Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. & O'Leary, K. (1989). Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. London, UK: London.

Mulac, A., Siebold, D. & Farris, J. (2000). Female and male managers’ and professionals’ criticism giving differences in language use and effects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019004001

Nippold, M.A., Mansfield, T.C., Billow, J.L. & Tomblin, J.B. (2008). Expository discourse in adolescents with language impairments: Examining syntactic development. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 17, 356-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/07-0049)

itzpatrick, M.A., Mulac, A. & Dindia, K. (1995). Gender-preferential language use in spouse and stranger interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 216-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X95141002

Mehl, M.R., Vazire, S., Ramfrez-Esparaza, N., Slatcher, R.B. & Pennebaker, J.W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139940

Galvin, S.M., Dolly, M.R. & Pula, J.J. (2013). Genderlect and participation in the college English classroom. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 79, 22-30.

Herring, S.C. (2000). Gender differences in Computer mediated communication (CMC): Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, 18.

Dovidio, J.F., Heltman, K., Brown, C.E. & Ellyson, S.L. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender linked tasks: A Multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.580

Bowers, J.M, Perez-Pouchoulen, M., Edwards, N.S. & McCarthy, M.M. (2013). Foxp2 mediates sex differences in ultrasonic vocalization by rat pups and directs order of maternal retrievel. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3276-3283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-12.2013

Brizendine, L. (2006). The female brain. NY: Broadway Books.

Leaper, C., & Ayres, M.M. (2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review.[25] Miller, J. & Chapman.R. (2003). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), Madison, WI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307302221

Harris, J.L. (1997). Reminiscence: A culturally and developmentally appropriate language intervention for older adults. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 6, 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0603.19

Nippold, M.A., Mansfield, T.C., Billow, J.L. & Tomblin, J.B. (2009). Syntactic development in adolescents with a history of language impairments: A follow-up investigation. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 18, 241-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0022)

Downloads

Published

2015-05-01

How to Cite

Hallett, T., & Steiger, J. (2015). Automated Analysis of Spoken Language: A Gender Comparison. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(5), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss5.353