The Integration Of Computing Technology Into Undergraduate Mathematics Classes

Christopher G. Serkan

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss5.371

Authors

Christopher G. Serkan University of North Georgia, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss5.371

Keywords:

Computing Technology, Integration, Undergraduate Mathematics

Abstract

This study investigated different calculus professors’ conceptions about mathematics and mathematical learning, calculus teaching with or without the use of computing technology, and the experiences in which those conceptions were grounded. Six college professors were purposefully selected and studied. The results showed the professors’ perceptions of the effects of technology use on pedagogy and students’ learning; their perceptions of barriers and challenges to the adoption and use of technology for teaching and learning calculus; and their experience, knowledge, and motivation for adopting instructional technology that made unique and significant contributions to explaining faculty use of technology for teaching and learning calculus. Some professors were categorically opposed to the use of computing technology in calculus, but others envisioned that computing technology could play a multitude of roles in their calculus classrooms. The more that the calculus professors wanted to focus on real-world applications and wanted students to apply calculus concepts in their academic disciplines, the more they were concerned about their own ability to facilitate such learning and the need to integrate computing technology into calculus. The more that the calculus professors focused on procedural understanding in mathematics and on teacher-centered lessons, the more they were concerned about students misusing computing technology and failing to develop a proper understanding of calculus concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Christopher G. Serkan, University of North Georgia, USA

Department of Mathematics

References

Beard, R., & Hartley, J. (1987). Teaching and learning in higher education (4th ed.). London, UK: Paul Chapman.

Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Bogdan, R. C., &Biklen, S. K. (2002). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

G., Chingos, M. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

M., Bayer, A. E., & Finkelstein, M. J. (1996). Teaching performance norms in academia. In D. E. Finnegan, D. Webster, & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Faculty and faculty issues in colleges and universities (ASHE Reader Series, pp. 120–167). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.

Burke, J. C. (2005). Reinventing accountability: From bureaucratic rules to performance results. In J. C. Burke (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education (pp. 216–245). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cox, M. (2001). Faculty learning communities: Change agents for transformation of institutions into learning organizations. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy (pp. 69–71). Boston, MA: Anker Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2001.tb00525.x

Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator.

Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143–163.

Ely, D. P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, 4, 23–27.

Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33.[11] Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Academic values and faculty rewards. In D. E. Finnegan, D. Webster, & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Faculty and faculty issues in colleges and universities (ASHE Reader Series, pp. 134–161). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102

Forster, P. A., & Taylor, P. C. (2006). A multiple-perspective analysis of learning in the presence of technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(1), 35–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004053819533

Gadanidis, G., Kamran, S., & Liang, H. (2004). Designing online mathematical investigation. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(3), 275–298.

Graham, A. T., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2000). Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 265–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004094013054

Grassl, R., & Mingus, T. T. Y. (2007). Team teaching and cooperative groups in abstract algebra: Nurturing a new generation of confident mathematics teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 581–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701256543

Groves, M. M., & Zemel, P. C. (2000). Instructional technology adoption in higher education: An action research case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1), 57–65.

Hamrick, F. A., Schuh, J. H., & Shelley, M. C. (2004). Predicting higher education graduation rates from institutional characteristics and resource allocation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(19), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n19.2004

Heid, M. K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.19.1.0003

Heid, M. K. (2002). Computer algebra systems in secondary mathematics classes: The time to act is now. Mathematics Teacher, 95(9), 662–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.95.9.0662

Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dmvm-1998-0205

Hillel, J. (1993). Computer algebra systems as cognitive technologies: Implications for the practice of mathematics education. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 106–128). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78542-9_2

Judson, E. (2007). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581–597.

King, J. P. (1992). The art of mathematics. New York, NY: Ballantine Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6339-0

Knapper, C. (1997). Rewards for teaching. In R. J. Menges & M. D. Svinicki (Eds.), New directions for institutional research: Universal challenges in faculty work: Fresh perspectives from around the world (pp. 41–52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7205

LaBerge, V. B., Zollman, A., & Sons, L. R. (1997). Awareness, beliefs, and classroom practices of mathematics faculty at the collegiate level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED409758)

Lim, D. (2000). Fostering a technology cultural change: The changing paradigms at the University of Minnesota Crookston. In L. A. Patrides (Ed.), Case studies on information technology in higher education: Implications for policy and practice (pp. 240–246). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.[27] McAlpine, L., & Gandell, T. (2003). Teaching improvement grants: What they tell us about professors’ instructional choices for the use of technology in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 281–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00327

McCracken, H. (2008). Best practices in supporting persistence of distance education students through integrated Web-based systems. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 65–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.f

Norton, S., McRobbie, C. J., & Cooper, T. J. (2000). Exploring secondary mathematics teachers’ reasons for not using computers in their teaching: Five case studies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 87–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782302

Pajares, F. M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Park, K. (1996). A comparative study of the traditional calculus course vs. the Calculus & Mathematica course. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38(11)A. (UMI No. 3280913)

Poincarѐ, H. (1910). Mathematical creation. The Monist, 20(3), 321–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/20.3.321

Quinlan, J. E. (2007). Profiles of software utilization by university mathematics faculty (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(11)A. (UMI No. 3262107)

Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782403

Rogers, D. L. (2000). A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educational Technology Review, 13, 19–27.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.

Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Santucci, K. B. (2007). An examination of the knowledge base for teaching among undergraduate mathematics faculty teaching calculus(Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(12)A. (UMI No. 3127593)

Simonsen, L. M., & Dick, T. P. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of graphing calculators in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2–3), 239–268.

Surry, D. W., & Ely, D. P. (2006). Adoption, diffusion, implementation, and institutionalization of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser, & V. J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 104–112). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.