Acquisition of experimental chemistry skills with the use of virtual laboratory simulations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol13.iss1.4225
Abstract views: 21 / PDF downloads: 20

Keywords:

Higher Education, foundation year, virtual laboratory, Titration

Abstract

The acquisition of laboratory skills is an essential aspect of any Biological Science degree.   Access to the physical laboratory has been limited in recent years and as such alternative provision was necessary to ensure students learn these essential skills.  This study focusses on the provision of virtual materials in the teaching and learning of the specific technique of acid-base titration on a Life Sciences foundation year chemistry module. To assess the efficacy of this alternative provision is in maintaining the acquisition of students’ experimental skills, worksheet outcomes were compared when students performed a titration themselves in the laboratory or virtually, using a Labster laboratory simulation. Student opinions of the virtual resources were generally positive, although perception of the utility of these virtual resources in student confidence to perform the experiment for real was lower for online only students.  This study demonstrates that the use of virtual materials successfully supported student understanding of the technique of acid-base titration, with comparable worksheet scores between online and in person cohorts. However, the reduction in confidence levels in online students should be noted, highlighting the importance of providing a range of materials to support student learning; including performing physical experiments to acquire essential scientific laboratory skills and increasing confidence.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Victoria Louise Allen-Baume, University of Essex

    Essex Pathways

References

Adams, D. J. (2009). Current trends in laboratory class teaching in university bioscience programmes. Bioscience education, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.13.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.13.3

Allchin, D. (2013). Problem-and case-based learning in science: an introduction to distinctions, values, and outcomes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1187%2Fcbe.12-11-0190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-11-0190

Attard, C., Berger, N., & Mackenzie, E. (2021). The Positive Influence of Inquiry-Based Learning Teacher Professional Learning and Industry Partnerships on Student Engagement With STEM [Original Research]. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693221

Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670

Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. (2014). Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature biotechnology, 32(7), 694-697. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2955

Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in science education, 49(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x

Chan, P., Van Gerven, T., Dubois, J.-L., & Bernaerts, K. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100053

Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499-541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544

Coleman, S. K., & Smith, C. L. (2019). Evaluating the benefits of virtual training for bioscience students. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1599689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1599689

De Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(5773), 532-533. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127750

De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

European-Commission, & Rocard, M. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/rapportrocardfinal.pdf

Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical review special topics-physics education research, 1(1), 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of computer assisted learning, 7(2), 75-83. https://www.rsc.org/images/Issue%207-2b_tcm18-52181.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; some thoughts from the literature. University chemistry education, 5(2), 42-51. https://rsc.li/2YMlKb2

Jolley, D. F., Wilson, S. R., Kelso, C., O’Brien, G., & Mason, C. E. (2016). Analytical thinking, analytical action: Using prelab video demonstrations and e-quizzes to improve undergraduate preparedness for analytical chemistry practical classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1855-1862. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00266

Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001

Labster. Labster. Retrieved from https://www.labster.com/

Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016). Virtual simulations as preparation for lab exercises: Assessing learning of key laboratory skills in microbiology and improvement of essential non-cognitive skills. PloS one, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155895

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 2nd ed [doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547369]. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational psychology review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10648-007-9047-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: A comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in science education, 51(2), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation. https://efepereth.wdfiles.com/local--files/science-education/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Pekdağ, B. (2020). Video-based instruction on safety rules in the chemistry laboratory: its effect on student achievement. Chemistry education research and practice, 21(3), 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00088D DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00088D

PhET. PhET Interactive Simulations. Retrieved from https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/filter?subjects=chemistry&sort=alpha&view=grid

Plass, J. L., & Schwartz, R. N. (2014). Multimedia learning with simulations and microworlds. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.036

Polly, P., Marcus, N., Maguire, D., Belinson, Z., & Velan, G. M. (2014). Evaluation of an adaptive virtual laboratory environment using Western Blotting for diagnosis of disease. BMC medical education, 14(1), 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-222

Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: Attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6

Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry education research and practice, 8(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90026C

Scalise, K., Timms, M., Moorjani, A., Clark, L., Holtermann, K., & Irvin, P. S. (2011). Student learning in science simulations: Design features that promote learning gains. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1050-1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20437

Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International journal of science education, 34(9), 1337-1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182

Smith, C., & Coleman, S. (2017). Using Labster to improve Bioscience student learning and engagement in practical classes Heads of Biological Sciences, Royal Society of Biology. Spring 2017 meeting., https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/q0z8z/using-labster-to-improve-bioscience-student-learning-and-engagement-in-practical-classes

Sypsas, A., & Kalles, D. (2018). Virtual laboratories in biology, biotechnology and chemistry education: a literature review Proceedings of the 22nd Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291533.3291560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3291533.3291560

Thisgaard, M., & Makransky, G. (2017). Virtual learning simulations in high school: Effects on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes and implications on the development of STEM academic and career choice. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00805

Toth, E. E., Ludvico, L. R., & Morrow, B. L. (2014). Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: the role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(5), 614-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.693102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.693102

Winberg, T. M., & Berg, C. A. R. (2007). Students' cognitive focus during a chemistry laboratory exercise: Effects of a computer‐simulated prelab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1108-1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20217

Wolstencroft, P., & Zhou, X. (2020). The Digital Literacy Myth: not all are natives. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/news-and-views/The-Digital-Literacy-Myth

Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and instruction, 21(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001

Downloads

Published

2025-04-08

How to Cite

Allen-Baume, V. L. (2025). Acquisition of experimental chemistry skills with the use of virtual laboratory simulations. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 13(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol13.iss1.4225