What Are the Possible Futures of Interdisciplinary Research in China?

Authors

  • Rongzhen Gu Author
  • Xiaofan Liu South China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol13.iss3.4284

Keywords:

interdisciplinary science department, interdisciplinary research, STEM, Chinese model

Abstract

The global interdisciplinary research is challenging by multi-factors. In November 29, 2020, the National Natural Science Foundation of China officially established a new “Interdisciplinary Science Department” (ISD). As a "Chinese model" for scientific research, the organizational innovation of the ISD has been highly prioritized. Two year later, the ISD has achieved preliminary success. However, some problems remain, typified by the stagnation of interdisciplinary research due to the absence of systematic national support. In order to explore the possible futures of interdisciplinary research in China and, more importantly, to respond to the global challenges of interdisciplinary research, four actions beyond ISD are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z. P. Academic Background of Nobel Prize Laureates Reveals the Importance of Multidisciplinary Education in Medicine. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2021, 3, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100114

2.Gates, A. J.; Ke, Q.; Varol, O.; Barabási, A. L. Natures’ Reach: Narrow Work Has Broad Impact. Nature. 2019, 575: 32-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03308-7

3.Abdulla, A. M.; Cramond, B. After Six Decades of Systematic Study of Creativity: What Do Teachers Need to Know About What It Is and How It Is Measured?. Roeper Review. 2017, 39, 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1247398

4.Leahey, E.; Barringer, S. N. Universities’ Commitment to Interdisciplinary Research: to What End?. Research Policy. 2020, 49, 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103910

5.Cash, D. W.; Adger, W. N.; Berkes, F. Garden, P.; Lebel, L; Olsson, P.; ... Young, O. Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World. Ecology & Society. 2006, 11, 8. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26265993

6.Ng, D. Embracing Interdisciplinary Connections in Academia. Nature Microbiology. 2022, 7, 470. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01084-1

7.Steffen, W.; Rockström, J.; Richardson, K.; Lenton, T. M.; Folke, C.; Liverman, D.; ... Schellnhuber, H. J. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018, 115, 8252-8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115

8.Ledford, H. How to Solve the World's Biggest Problems. Nature. 2015, 525, 308-311. https://doi.org/10.1038/525308a

9.Rylance, R. Grant Giving: Global Funders to Focus on Interdisciplinarity. Nature. 2015, 525, 313-315. https://doi.org/10.1038/525313a

10.Choi, B. C.; Pak, A. W. Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Transdisciplinarity in Health Research, Services, Education and Policy: 2. Promotors, Barriers, and Strategies of Enhancement. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 2007, E224-E232. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950

11.Stokols, D.; Fuqua, J.; Gress, J.; Harvey, R.; Phillips, K.; Baezconde-Garbanati, L.; ... Trochim, W. Evaluating Transdisciplinary Science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2003, S21-S39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200310001625555

12.Zhong, B.; Liu, X.; Zhan, Z.; Ke, Q.; Wang, F. What Should a Chinese Top-Level Design in STEM Education Look Like?. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. 2022, 9, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01279-1

13.Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). The Natural Science Foundation of China established the Department of Interdisciplinary Science. 2020. Available online: https://www.nsfc.gov.cn//publish/portal0/tab440/info79287.htm [in Chinese]

14.Ministry of Education of China (MOE). Notice on setting up “interdisciplinary” categories, “integrated circuit science and engineering” and “national security” first-level disciplines. 2021. Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s5147/202101/t20210114_509760.html [in Chinese]

15.Ministry of Education of China (MOE). Notice of "Interdisciplinary Setting and Management Measures (Trial). 2021. Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/202112/t20211203_584501.html [in Chinese]

16.State Council of the People's Republic of China. National Medium and Long-Term Science and Technology Development Plan (2006-2020). 2006. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htm [in Chinese]

17.Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. Outline of National Innovation-Driven Development Strategy. 2016. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5076961.htm [in Chinese].

18.Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. 13th Five-Year Plan for National Science and Technology Innovation. 2016. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-08/08/content_5098072.htm [in Chinese].

19.Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. 2004. Available online: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/initiative/committee-on-facilitating-interdisciplinary-research

20.Davé, A.; Hopkins, M.; Hutton, J.; Krcál, A.; Kolarz, P.; Martin, B.; ... Stirling, A. Landscape Review of Interdisciplinary Research in the UK. 2021. Available online: https://http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/65332/1/2016HEFCE_Landscape%20review% 20of%20UK% 20interdisciplinary%20research.pdf.

21.HEFCE. Case Study Review of Interdisciplinary Research in Higher Education Institutions in England. 2021. Available online: https://emps.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/emps/research/cee/news/Technopolis-Case_study_of_interdisciplinary_research_in_HEIs_in_England.pdf.

22.Hazard, L.; Cerf, M.; Lamine, C.; Magda, D.; Steyaert, P. A Tool for Reflecting on Research Stances to Support Sustainability Transitions. Nature Sustainability. 2023, 3, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0440-x

23.Norström, A. V.; Cvitanovic, C.; Löf, M. F.; West, S.; Wyborn, C.; Balvanera, P.; ... Österblom, H. Principles for Knowledge Co-production in Sustainability Research. Nature Sustainability. 2020, 3, 182-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2

24.Klein, J. T.; Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Work: Framing Promotion and Tenure Practices and Policies. Research Policy. 2017, 46, 1055-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001

25.Okamura, K. Interdisciplinarity Revisited: Evidence for Research Impact and Dynamism. Palgrave Communications. 2019, 5, 141. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0352-4

26.Editorials. How to Avoid Glib Interdisciplinarity. Nature. 2017, 552, 148. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-017-08465-1

27.Urbanska, K.; Huet, S.; Guimond, S. Does Increased Interdisciplinary Contact among Hard and Social Scientists Help or Hinder Interdisciplinary Research?. PLoS ONE. 2019, 14, e0221907. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221907

28.Brown, R.; Deletic, A.; Wong, T. Interdisciplinarity: How to Catalyse Collaboration. Nature. 2015, 525, 315-317. https://doi.org/10.1038/525315a

29.Brainard, J. Funding Agency’s Reviewers Were Biased Against Scientists with Novel Ideas. Science. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.acx9517

30.Bromham, L.; Dinnage, R.; Hua, X. Interdisciplinary Research Has Consistently Lower Funding Success. Nature. 2016, 534, 684-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315

31. Kane, J. S. Reviewing Interdisciplinary Research. Science. 1999, 283, 1115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5405.1115b

32. Moore, T. J.; Smith, K. A. Advancing the State of the Art of STEM Integration. Journal of STEM Education, 2014, 15, 5-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294427783_Advancing_the_State_of_the_Art_of_STEM_Integration

33. Sunami, A. STEM Education: to Build a Scientist. Nature. 2015, 523, 371-373. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7560-371a

34. Zaman, M. H. Inclusion and Equity through STEM Training. Science. 2021, 372, 926. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj1410

35. Zellmer, A. J.; Sherman, A. Culturally Inclusive STEM Education. Science. 2017, 358, 312-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0358

36. Wang, X. K. From Interdisciplinary Research to Interdisciplinarity. Social Sciences in China Press. 2016, 930. sscp.cssn.cn/xkpd/kxyrw/201603/t20160322_2931764.html [in Chinese].

37. Viseu, A. Integration of Social Science into Research is Crucial. Nature. 2015, 525, 291. https://doi.org/10.1038/525291a

38. Tang, L. A Role for Funders in Fostering China’ s Research Integrity. Science. 2022, 375, 979-981. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7992

39. Van Noorden, R. Interdisciplinary Research by the Numbers. Nature. 2015, 525, 306-307. https://doi.org/10.1038/525306a

40. Wang, J.; Thijs, B.; Glänzel, W.Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity. PLoS ONE. 2015 ,10, e0127298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127298

41. Wagner, C. S.; Roessner, J. D.; Bobb, K.; Klein, J. T.; Boyack, K. W.; Keyton, J.; ... Börner. K. Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (IDR): A Review of the Literature. Journal of Informetrics. 2011, 5, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004

42. Editorials. Nature is Trialling Transparent Peer Review — The Early Results Are Encouraging. Nature. 2022, 603, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00493-w

43. Berg, J. Science Advances Advancing. Science. 2018, 361, 7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6038

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

Gu, R., & Liu, X. (2026). What Are the Possible Futures of Interdisciplinary Research in China?. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 13(3), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol13.iss3.4284