Understanding and Creating 3D Forms Using Familiar Objects

Authors

  • Mithra Zahedi University of Montreal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss1.501

Abstract

A fundamental for first-year design students is to express ideas by drawing and creating volumetric models. Traditionally, this education includes spatial geometry and generation of forms whereby students learn to appreciate intersections of volumes and projections to describe three-dimensional (3D) forms in two dimensions. However, given the aptitude of today’s students to operate 3D-modelling software and the general accessibility of current technology, spatial geometry as a core subject may seem less relevant. Our goal is to re-engage students in learning required basic knowledge and skills through a complex multifaceted design process. We have designed a first-semester course of four project-based learning activities that apply learning-by-doing methodology. For each of the past three years, 65 to 75 students have participated in our 3D Expression studio course, in which they develop understanding of design process, vocabulary, and skills to create 3D models with precision, refinements, and high-level visual impact. This paper reports on the successful results of activities conducted during the 14 full days of this studio course.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mithra Zahedi, University of Montreal

    Assistant professor

References

Lupton, E. & Miller, J.A. The ABCs of the Bauhaus and Design Theory. 1993, Princeton Architectural Press, Inc.

Wiggings, G. & McTighe, J. Understanding by Design. 1998, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Dewey, J. Experience & Education. 1938/1997, New York: Touchstone.

Piaget, J. La construction du réel chez l'enfant. 2980, Suisse, Delachaux-Niesttlé: Neuchâtel.

Edelson, D.C. Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 2002, pp.105–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4

Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W. & Krajcik, J.S. Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 1991, pp. 369–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139

Schön, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. 1983, New York: Basic Books.

Kolb, D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 1984, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Resnick, M. & Rosenbaum, E. Designing for Tinkerability. In M. Honey & D.R. Kanter (Eds.), Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators. 2013, Routledge.

Rittel, H., & Webber, M. Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. 1973, pp. 155–169. Working Papers from the Urban & Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. 2006, London: Springer.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-01

How to Cite

Zahedi, M. (2016). Understanding and Creating 3D Forms Using Familiar Objects. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss1.501