Comparative Study of the Impact of Instructional Materials and Technology on Traditional and Distance Education Systems.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss2.519Keywords:
Instructional material, technology, traditional education, distance educationAbstract
Recent changes in information and communication technologies have significantly impacted teaching and learning processes. Methods of doing business have also changed. Many experts now recommend that students’ educational experiences be reformed to better prepare students for their future, which entails incorporating technology in the teaching process. The objective of this study is to assess the importance of technology and good instructional materials on two educational systems – distance and traditional systems. We conclude, among others, that good instructional materials should be clear, precise, and must deliver accurate message as were initially designed to do irrespective of traditional or distance educational system. We further conclude that whereas technology may have greater influence on distance education than on the traditional classroom system, however, when applied appropriately, technology will also enhance learning in the traditional classroom system. Students will comprehend faster, and it will make the teaching task less difficult. Education planners and instructors must ensure that application of technology; especially in distance education does not jeopardize the quality of learning.
Downloads
References
. Gujjar, A. A. & Malik, M. A. (2007). Preparation of instructional material for
distance teacher education. Turkish Jour. of Distance Education, 8, 55 – 63.
. Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2008). Instructional Media
and Technologies for Learning (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
. Sun, P. & Chen, H. K (2007). The design of instructional multimedia in
e-learning: a media richness theory-based approach. Computers & Education, 49, 662 – 676.
. Wikipedia (2015). Technology. Retrieved November 17, 2015, from
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/technology.
. Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. (2003). Learning to solve
problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Upper
Saddle, River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
. Li, Q. & Edmonds, K. A. (2005). Mathematics and At-Risk Adult Learners: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782454
Would Technology Help? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 143 – 166.
. Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: a tale of two DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782488
cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 377 – 397.
. William, D. Jr. (2007). The status of education technology in the United
States: A triennial report of the findings from the States. Technology Teacher, 67, 14 - 21.
. Cummings, L. (1996). Educational technology – a functional resistance view.
Part II: Challenges of resources, technology and tradition. EducationalTechnology Review, 5, 18 – 20.
. Hoffner, H. (2007). The elementary teacher’s digital toolbox. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
. Duffin, D. (1999). Education: The need for Transition. Retrieved November
, 2015, from: http://www.nd.edu/~frswrite/issues/1998-1999/sp99/Duffin1.shtml
. Mashhour, A. S. (2007). A distance education model for Jordanian students
based on an empirical study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED496530).
. Keegan, D. (1980). On defining distance education. Distance Education, 1, 13 – 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791800010102
. Park, S. & Lim, J. (2007). Promoting positive emotion in multimedia learning
using visual illustrations. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 16, 141 – 162.
. Tindall-Ford, S. & Sweller, J. (2006). Altering the modality of instructions to
facilitate imagination: interactions between the modality and imagination
effects. Instructional Science, 34, 343 – 365.
. Lockerby, C., Breau, R., & Zuvela, B. (2006). Enhancing digital access to
learning materials for Canadians with perceptual disabilities: a pilot study.
Journal of Visual Impairement & Blindness, 100, 477 – 482.
. Sunal, C. S., Smith, C., Sunal, D. W., & Britt, J. (1998). Using the Internet to
create meaningful instruction. Social Studies, 89, 13 – 18.
. Becker, H. J. & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use
on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on
Computing in Education, 32(4), 356 – 384.
. Alghazo, I. M. (2006). Quality of Internet use by teachers in the United Arab
Emirates. Education, 126, 769 – 781.
. Baek, Y., Jung, J., & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in
the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with
a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50, 224 – 234.
. Loh-Ludher, L. L. (2007). The socioeconomic context of home-based
learning by women in Malaysia. Distance Education, 28, 179 – 193.
. Pena-Bandalaria, M. (2007). Impact of ICTs on Open and Distance Learning
in a Developing Country Setting: The Philippine experience. International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8, 1 – 15.
. Taylor, H., & Hogenbirk, P. (2001). Information and Communication
Technologies in Education:The School of the Future. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
. Hasselbring, T. (1984). Research on the effectiveness of computer-based
instruction: A review. Technical Report No. 84.1.3 (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED262754).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Onyilagha Joseph Chuks, Nnajiofor Francisca Nebechi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
