Formative Assessment and Learning
Science Teachers’ Perception at East Gojjam Preparatory Schools, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss10.599Keywords:
Science teachers, perception, Formative assessment, Learning, Preparatory schoolsAbstract
Integrating different formative assessment strategies into daily instruction are the current assertion to improve students’ learning, particularly in science education. However, the practice of assessment for learning is not straightforward. It depends on many factors. Thus, this study was aimed at investigating science teachers’ perception on the pedagogical power of formative assessment to support students’ learning. The participants of the study were 153 science teachers in East Gojjam Preparatory schools. Questionnaire, semi-structured interview and lesson observation were used to get valid information about the issue. Percentage and mean were used to analyse the quantitative data. For the qualitative data content analysis was used. The results showed that teachers who participated in this study perceived formative assessment as variety of tools used to evaluate learning at the end of the lesson continuously. This was evident by their response inconsistency to items in the questionnaire and what they actually do in the classroom. Teachers’ lack appropriate knowledge and skill about assessment for learning strategies. Thus, it has negative implication on the integration of formative assessment strategies within their daily instruction to improve students’ learning.
Downloads
References
Baird, J.-A. (2010). Belief and Practice in Teacher Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principle, Policy and Practice, 17, 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903562682
Bruno, I., and Santos, L. (2010). Written Comments as a Form of Feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 111-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.12.001
Cowie, B. (2012). Focusing on the Classroom: Assessment for Learning. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 679-690). London: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_45
Cowie, B., Moreland, J., & Otrel-cass, K. (2013). Expanding Notions of Assessment for Learning: Inside Science and Technology Primary Classrooms. Netherlands: Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-061-3
Department of Children, Schools and Famlies. (2010). Learning Targets in Science: The National Strategie. Crown copyright.
Fisseha, M. (2010). The Role of Assessment in Curriculum Practice and Enhancement of Learning. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Science, 5, 101-113.
Greenstein, L. (2010). What Teachers Really Need to Know About Formative Assessment. USA: ASCD.
Gulikers, J.T.M., Biemans, H.J.A., Wesselink, R., and Wel, M. (2013). Aligning Formative and Summative assessment: A Collaborative Action Research Challenging Teacher Conception. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 116-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.03.001
Harlen, W. (2010). Professional Learning to Support Teacher Assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Developing Teacher Assessment (pp. 100-129). New York: Open University Press.
Harlen, W., and Gardner, J. (2010). Assessment to Support Learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Developing Teacher Assessment (pp. 15-28). New York: Open University Press.
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative Assessment and Next-Generation Assessment Systems: Are We Losing an Opportunity? Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
Heritage, M. (2011). Formative Assessment: An Enabler of Learning. Evidence-Based Education, 18-19.
Herman, J. (2013). Formative Assessment for Next Generation Science Standards: A Proposed Model. Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment.
Hodgson, C., & Pyle, K. (2010). A Literature Review of Assessment for Learning in Science. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Advancing Formative Assessment in Every Classroom: A Guide for Instructional Leaders. USA: ASCD.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond Feedback: Developing Students Capability in Complex Appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 535-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
Stiggins, R. (2009). Assessment for Learning in Upper Elementary Grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 419-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000608
Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers' Assessment Practices in Mathematics: Classrooms in the Context of Reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17, 399-417.Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the Heart of Authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 433-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.497469
Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as Educational Theory: Contingency in Learning, and Optimally Guided Instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Education Theory (pp. 39-61). United Kingdom: NOVA Science Publisher, Inc.
Willis, J. (2011). Afifiliation, Autonomy and Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 399-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.604305
Yigzaw, A. (2013). High school English teachers' and Students’ perceptions, attitudes and actual practices of continuous assessment. Educational Research and Review, 8, 1489-1498.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Askalemariam Adamu Dessie, Prem Jotham Heeralal
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.