An Exploratory Study of the Qualities that Distinguish Potential from Realized Innovators

Denis Leo Greene; Maria Vidos Hunt

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol5.iss8.774

Authors

Denis Leo Greene Ottawa University, Kansas City, Missouri
Maria Vidos Hunt Avila University, MeWe Mindfulness LLC; Ottawa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol5.iss8.774

Keywords:

innovation, ideation, idea generation, creativity, creative thinking

Abstract

This study explored the similarities and differences between 36 accomplished and 36 hopeful innovators in a large midwestern city in the United States. Both groups reported a higher frequency of recognized ideas when creative thinking occurred in the morning and under conditions of a state of calm. Realized Innovators uniquely approached the ideation process by intentionally applying a set of processes they found reliably effective. Potential Innovators were less deliberate in their approach to idea generation and were more likely to pursue activities with weak associations to creative outputs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Denis Leo Greene, Ottawa University, Kansas City, Missouri

Dept. of Psychology
Maria Vidos Hunt, Avila University, MeWe Mindfulness LLC; Ottawa University

I received my Ph.D. in clinical psychology and organizational development from Louisiana State University in 1980. I worked 15 years as a psychotherapist in Sacramento, California before joining the academic ranks. I was a Professor of Psychology at Lower Brule Community College, Dakota Wesleyan University, and Avila University (with adjunct work at Ottawa University, Kansas City). In 2014, I retired from my tenured position to form my own company, ME/WE Mindfulness, which is devoted to "translating science into well being." I continue to serve as an adjunct professor at Avila University via an online research lab.

References

Arreola, N.J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). The effect of problem construction creativity on solutions creativity across multiple everyday problems. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 287-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040389

Beghetto, R. A. (in press). Creativity in teaching. In J. C. Kaufman, J. Baer, & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Different Domains. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Beaty, R.E., & Fink, A. (2016). Brain mechanisms associated with internally directed attention and self-generated thought. Scientific Reports 6, Article number 22959. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/srep22959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22959

Cadle, C.R. (2015). A completion mindset: Bridging the gap between creative thinking and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 9(2), 172-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000019

Carlo, J.L., Lyytinen, K., & Rose, G.M. (2012). A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 865-895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41703484

Carson, S., Peterson, J.B., & Higgins, D.M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4

Chen, C., Kasof, J., Himsel, A., Dmitrieva, J., Dong, Q., & Xue, G. (2005). Effects of explicit instruction to “be creative” across domains and cultures. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 89-110.Cohen, W.S., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01252.x

Corazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627

Dijkgraaf, R. (2017, June). Knowledge is infrastructure. Scientific American Mind, 28(3), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0617-8

Dorrow, P.F., Davila, G., Varvakis, G., & Vallejos, R.V. (2015). Generation of ideas, ideation and idea management. Navus, 5(2), 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22279/navus.2015.v5n2.p51-59.248

Flexner, A. (2017). The usefulness of useless knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884629

Glăveanu, V.P. (2012). Habitual creativity: Revisiting habit, reconceptualizing creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 78-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026611

Hammond, M.M., Neff, N.L., Farr, J.L., Schwall, A.R., & Zhao, S. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556

Hennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416

Hu, B., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Creative self-efficacy mediates the relationship between knowledge sharing and employee innovation. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(5), 815-826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.5.815

IBM Institute for Business Value (2016). Redefining competition: Insights from the Global C-suite Study-The CEO perspective. Retrieved from http://www-935.ibm.com/services/c-suite study/ studies/ceo-study/

Jordanous, A., & Keller, B. (2016). Modelling creativity: Identifying key components through a corpus-based approach. PLOS One, 11(10), 1-27. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/ article?id= 10.1371/journal.pone.0162959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162959

Katz-Buonincontro, J., Hass, R.W., & Friedman, G. (2017). “Engineering” student creativity in a probability and statistics course: Investigating perceived versus actual creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/aca0000118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000118

Kunde, A.W., Kiria, P.S., & Ngondi, G. (2017). University-industry collaboration and innovativeness of firms: Evidence from Kenya Innovation Survey. International Journal for Innovation: Education and Research, 5(3), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol5.iss3.76

Law, R., Evans, P.H., Thorn, L., Hucklebridge, F., & Crow, A. (2015). The cortisol awakening response predicts same morning executive function: results from a 50-day case study. Stress, 19(6), 616-621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2015.1076789

Liao, S., Chang, W., Hu, D., & Yueh, Y. (2012). Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge acquisition, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in Taiwan’s banking and insurance industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 52-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.599947

Lenart, R. (2014). Operationalization of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 13(3), 86-98.

Lustenberger, C., Boyle, M.R., Foulser, A.A., Mellin, J.M., & Frohlich, F. (2015). Role of frontal alpha oscillations in creativity. Cortex, 67, 74-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.012

National Education Association (2014). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs”. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/ A-Guide-to-Four-Cs.pdfPatterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics & behaviours of innovative people in organizations: Literature review. A paper prepared for NESTA Policy and Research Unit. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/characteristics_behaviours_ of_innovative_people.pdf

Plucker, J.A., Beghetto, R.A., & Dow, G.T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

Powell, W.W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 199-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037

Rozman, R., & Kovac, J. (2015). Individual and organizational creativity and innovation: Their management. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal, 4(2), 39-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17708/DRMJ.2015.v04n02a03

Simmons, A.L., Payne, S.C., & Pariyothorn, M.M. (2014). The role of means efficacy when predicting creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873667

Simonton, D.K. (2013). Creative thoughts as acts of free will: A two-stage formal integration. Review of General Psychology, 17(4), 374-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032803

Simonton, D.K. (2016). Simonton, D.K. (2016). Creativity, automaticity, irrationality, fortuity, fantasy, and other contingencies: An eightfold response typology. Review of General Psychology, 20(2). 194-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000075

Sternberg, R.J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652925

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S.M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952

Weinberger, A.B., Green, A.E., & Chrysikou, E.G. (2017). Using transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance creative cognition: Interactions between task, polarity, and stimulation site. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 246, 1-9. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/ 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00246/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00246

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995