Why congress needs to act to update protection for electronic communications from multiple and extensive threats from around the world.

Frederick Greene; Linda Naimi

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss8.1133

Authors

Frederick Greene Eastern New Mexico University, USA
Linda Naimi Purdue University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss8.1133

Keywords:

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS

Abstract

This article analyzes the extent that digital privacy acts are adequately protected by existing law. The authors look at the historical protection of these rights, and note that the last major piece of legislation in the area was 1986. An analysis of the changes in society from 1986 to the present indicates that changes to current law are long overdue. The authors review some recommended changes and call for Congress to act to update American laws related to electronic communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Digital Due Process.Org (2016) Recommendations to modernize ECPA.

Greene, F. (2016) The path towards clear and convincing privacy rights. A dissertation submitted to Purdue University Graduate School. Published by Proquest, LLC. # 10172338.

(The current article is taken almost verbatim from selected portions of the 2016 dissertation with additional commentary and analysis.)

Horn, K. A. (2002) Privacy versus protection: Exploring the boundaries of electronic

surveillance in the internet age. Fordham Urban Law Review, 29, 2233-2269.

Lasprogata, G., King, N. & Pillay, S. (2004) Regulations of electronic employee monitoring: Identifying fundamental principles of employee privacy through a comparative study of data privacy legislation in the European Union, United States and Canada. Stanford Technology Law Review, 2004, 4-62.

McDonough, T. Y. (2007). Internet communications privacy after United States V.

Councilman. Seton Hall Law Review, 37, 1051-1073.

Mendez, N. (2008). Patent Infringers, Come Out With Your Hands Up! Should the United States Criminalize Patent Infringement?, 6 Buff. Intell. Prop. L.J. 34 (2008).

Mossoff, A. (2007). Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents? Reevaluating the Patent “Privilege” in Historical Context, 92 Cor. L. Rev. 953.

Mulligan, D. K. (2004). Reasonable expectations in electronic communications: A critical perspective on the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. George Washington Law Review, 72, 1557-1597.Oyama, K. A. (2006) E-mail privacy after United States V. Councilman: Legislative

options for amending ECPA. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 21, 499-524.

Pikowsky, R. A. (2003). The need for revisions to the law of wiretapping and interception of email. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 10, 1-71.