OBE Method of Assessments for Capstone Civil Engineering Project Design

Authors

  • NIM Pauzi Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia
  • ZC Muda Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss2.149

Keywords:

bloom taxonomy, capstone engineering design, outcome based education, rubric assessment, method of assessment

Abstract

Civil Engineering capstone design course has been introduced in UNITEN since Semester 2 2006/2007. In the
earlier of the introduction, this subject is considered as an elective subject but during Semester 2 2008/2009, the
subject has become compulsory due to the requirement by Engineering Accreditations Council (EAC). This subject
is a team design project applying engineering and project management principles for multidisciplinary design
which would involve an integration of Civil Engineering including environmental, geotechnical, structural, water
supply and drainage system, sewerage system, project management and road design. This course has divided
the design stage into two stages which are preliminary design and final design. This paper is a review paper on
the method of assessment for capstone design course and the example on the implementations of OBE method
assessment in UNITEN. Method of assessment in this subject should be based on the student’s participations,
formal presentation, written reports, conceptual and detailed design and finally tender document and
construction cost estimates. The assessments also including the bloom taxonomy to produce a well balanced
student with ability to have critical thinking, soft skill and also technical skills. The rubric system makes the
assessment easier by implementing range of marks to the quality of the works done by the undergraduate for
the capstone design course. The future predictions of this course would be giving the real engineering projects
to the students to help in the construction of a houses or buildings for poor community. This would expose the
students to the importance of helping the community as the primary role of civil engineering is to help the
community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • NIM Pauzi, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia

    Senior Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering

  • ZC Muda, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia

    Head of Department and Reader, Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering

References

Beyerlein S., Davis D., Trevisan M., Thompson P., and Harrison K., 2006, Assessment Framework for

Capstone Design Course, Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education.

Catalano G.D., 2004, Senior Capstone Design and Ethics : A Bridge to the Professional World, Science DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0037-1

and Engineering /ethics, Volume 10, Issue 2, 409-415

Davis D., Beyerlein S., Trevisan M, Thompson P. and Harrison K., 2006, A Conceptual Model for

Capstone Engineering Design Performance and Assessment, Proceedings of American Society for

Engineering Education.

Dinehart D.W. and Gross S.P., 2010, A Service Learning Structural Engineering Capstone Course and

the Assessment of Technical and Non-technical Objectives, Advances in Engineering Education,

Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Spring 2010.

Dym C., Agogino A., Eris O., Freg D., and Leifer L., 2005, Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

Learning, Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), pp 103-120

Kim W., 2009, Am Approach of Formative Assessment for Capstone Design Project Course,

International Network for Engineering Education and Research, http://www.ineer.org/ ICEEiCEER2009

Krathwohl D.R., Bloom B.S., & Massia B.B. (1973), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives the

Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain, New York, David McKay Co. Inc.

Ricketts P., Ricketts C.I., and Leon Cox, 2006, The Evolution of Capstone Design Course to Include

Outcomes Assessment, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Southern

Schoon J.G., (1994), Transportation Capstone Design Project, Journal of Professional Issues in DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1994)120:1(70)

Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 120, pp 70-89

Simpson, E.J. (1972), The Classification of Educational Objectives in Psychomotor Domain,

Washington, D.C: Gryphon House[11]Sobek II D.K., Jain V.K. , 2004, Two Instruments for Assessing Design Outcomes of Capstone Projects,

Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

Stuart J. A., (1997), A Method for Teaching Problem Assessment Frontiers in Education Conference,

th Annual Conference, Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, Vol. 1, pp 83-87

McKenzie L.J., Trevisan M.S., Davis D.C., Beyerlein W., 2004, Capstone Design Course and

Assessment: A National Study, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education

Annual Conference & Exposition

Meyer D.G., (2005), Capstone Design Outcome Assessment: Instrument for Quantitative Evaluation,

Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings

Downloads

Published

2014-02-01

How to Cite

Pauzi, N., & Muda, Z. (2014). OBE Method of Assessments for Capstone Civil Engineering Project Design. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss2.149