OBE Method of Assessments for Capstone Civil Engineering Project Design

Authors

  • NIM Pauzi Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia Author
    • ZC Muda Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia Author

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss2.149

      Keywords:

      bloom taxonomy, capstone engineering design, outcome based education, rubric assessment, method of assessment

      Abstract

      Civil Engineering capstone design course has been introduced in UNITEN since Semester 2 2006/2007. In the
      earlier of the introduction, this subject is considered as an elective subject but during Semester 2 2008/2009, the
      subject has become compulsory due to the requirement by Engineering Accreditations Council (EAC). This subject
      is a team design project applying engineering and project management principles for multidisciplinary design
      which would involve an integration of Civil Engineering including environmental, geotechnical, structural, water
      supply and drainage system, sewerage system, project management and road design. This course has divided
      the design stage into two stages which are preliminary design and final design. This paper is a review paper on
      the method of assessment for capstone design course and the example on the implementations of OBE method
      assessment in UNITEN. Method of assessment in this subject should be based on the student’s participations,
      formal presentation, written reports, conceptual and detailed design and finally tender document and
      construction cost estimates. The assessments also including the bloom taxonomy to produce a well balanced
      student with ability to have critical thinking, soft skill and also technical skills. The rubric system makes the
      assessment easier by implementing range of marks to the quality of the works done by the undergraduate for
      the capstone design course. The future predictions of this course would be giving the real engineering projects
      to the students to help in the construction of a houses or buildings for poor community. This would expose the
      students to the importance of helping the community as the primary role of civil engineering is to help the
      community.

      Author Biographies

      • NIM Pauzi, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia

        Senior Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering

      • ZC Muda, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia

        Head of Department and Reader, Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering

      References

      Beyerlein S., Davis D., Trevisan M., Thompson P., and Harrison K., 2006, Assessment Framework for

      Capstone Design Course, Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education.

      Catalano G.D., 2004, Senior Capstone Design and Ethics : A Bridge to the Professional World, Science DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0037-1

      and Engineering /ethics, Volume 10, Issue 2, 409-415

      Davis D., Beyerlein S., Trevisan M, Thompson P. and Harrison K., 2006, A Conceptual Model for

      Capstone Engineering Design Performance and Assessment, Proceedings of American Society for

      Engineering Education.

      Dinehart D.W. and Gross S.P., 2010, A Service Learning Structural Engineering Capstone Course and

      the Assessment of Technical and Non-technical Objectives, Advances in Engineering Education,

      Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, Spring 2010.

      Dym C., Agogino A., Eris O., Freg D., and Leifer L., 2005, Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

      Learning, Journal of Engineering Education 94(1), pp 103-120

      Kim W., 2009, Am Approach of Formative Assessment for Capstone Design Project Course,

      International Network for Engineering Education and Research, http://www.ineer.org/ ICEEiCEER2009

      Krathwohl D.R., Bloom B.S., & Massia B.B. (1973), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives the

      Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain, New York, David McKay Co. Inc.

      Ricketts P., Ricketts C.I., and Leon Cox, 2006, The Evolution of Capstone Design Course to Include

      Outcomes Assessment, Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Southern

      Schoon J.G., (1994), Transportation Capstone Design Project, Journal of Professional Issues in DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1994)120:1(70)

      Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 120, pp 70-89

      Simpson, E.J. (1972), The Classification of Educational Objectives in Psychomotor Domain,

      Washington, D.C: Gryphon House[11]Sobek II D.K., Jain V.K. , 2004, Two Instruments for Assessing Design Outcomes of Capstone Projects,

      Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition

      Stuart J. A., (1997), A Method for Teaching Problem Assessment Frontiers in Education Conference,

      th Annual Conference, Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, Vol. 1, pp 83-87

      McKenzie L.J., Trevisan M.S., Davis D.C., Beyerlein W., 2004, Capstone Design Course and

      Assessment: A National Study, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education

      Annual Conference & Exposition

      Meyer D.G., (2005), Capstone Design Outcome Assessment: Instrument for Quantitative Evaluation,

      Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings

      Downloads

      Published

      2014-02-01

      How to Cite

      Pauzi, N., & Muda, Z. (2014). OBE Method of Assessments for Capstone Civil Engineering Project Design. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss2.149