Distance Education
Effects of individual factors on the perceived image of high education institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss5.2320Keywords:
Organizational Image, Distance Education, Public University, MarketingAbstract
Current changes in the socioeconomic variables in which both public and private universities interact require them to manage their image to attract and satisfy their students. Added to this, new technologies are affecting education, increasing the supply and relevance of distance learning in the university structure. Given that, this research aimed to understand which individual factors cause significant differences in perceived university image. This study is a descriptive field research. We collected the data with a survey and analysed the results using factor analyses, t-tests, and linear regression. We found that gender, age, income, and length of interaction between the students and the organization do not influence the overall image. However, the exact sciences students presented a different perception of the researched institutions. Given the results, we concluded that perceived image can be seen as a momentary picture. The study indicates the image as a multidimensional construct. This construct is most expressively associated with intangible aspects.
Downloads
References
Aghaz, A., Hashemi, A., & Sharifi Atashgah, M. S. (2015) Factors contributing to university image: the postgraduate students’ points view. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 25 (1), 104-126.
Ahmad, S., Shaheen, I. B., Quarshi, S., Hunjra, A. I., & Niazi, G. S. K. (2011). Outcomes of cause related marketing: a demographic analysis. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 10(2), 260-269.
Alcaide-Pulido, P., Alves, H., Gutiérrez-Villar, B. (2017) Development of a model to analyze HEI image: a case based on a private and a public university. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 27 (2), 162-187.
Alwi, S. F. S., & Kitchen, P. J. (2014). Projecting corporate brand image and behavioral response in business schools: Cognitive or affective brand attributes?. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2324-2336.
An, J., Kwak, H., Jung, S. G., Salminen, J., & Jansen, B. J. (2018). Customer segmentation using online platforms: isolating behavioral and demographic segments for persona creation via aggregated user data. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 8(1), 54.
Aranha, F., & Zambaldi, F. (2008). Análise Fatorial em Administração. São Paulo, BR: Cengage Learning.
Asaad, Y., Melewar, T. C., Cohen, G., & MT Balmer, J. (2013). Universities and export market orientation: An exploratory study of UK post-92 universities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(7), 838-856.
Azoury, N. M., Daou, L. E., & El Khoury, C. M. (2013). University image and its relationship to student satisfaction: case of the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Lebanon. Journal of Executive Education, 12(1), 4.
Balmer, J. M. T., & Grayser, S. A. (2006). Corporate marketing integrating corporate identity, corporate branding, corporate communications, corporate image and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing, 40 (7/8), 730-741.
Balmer, J.M.T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing: seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing. 35 (3/4), 248-291.
Brust Hackmayer, M. & Bohadana, E. (2014). Professor ou tutor: uma linha tênue na docência em EAD. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 17 (2).
Casidy, R. (2013). The role of brand orientation in the higher education sector: A student-perceived paradigm. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(5), 803-820.
CEDERJ – Centro de Educação Superior a Distância do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. (2017). Consórcio CEDERJ. Retrieved from http://cederj.edu.br/cederj.
Claro, T. (2007). A docência no consórcio CEDERJ: Interatividade ou transmissão. In: Encontro de Educação e Tecnologias da Informação e da Comunicação. 2007. E-TIC.
Da Costa, F. R. D., & Pelissari, A. S. (2017). Corporate image: Influencing factors from the viewpoint of students of distance learning courses. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 14(1), 108-130.da
Doña-Toledo, L.; Luque-Martínez, T. & Del Barrio-García, S. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of university perceveid value, according to graduates: the moderating role of higher education involvement. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. p. 1-31.
Dowling, G. R. (1986). Managing your corporate images. Industrial Marketing Management, 15 (2), 109-115.
Druteikiene, G. (2011, May). University image: essence, meaning, theoretical and empirical investigation. In Global Conference on Business. 167-174.
Duarte, P. O., Alves, H. B., & Raposo, M. B. (2010).Understanding university image: A structural equation model approach. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1 (7), 21–36.
Faé, B., Teixeira, A., de Lima, M. M., & Azzari, V. Antecedentes da lealdade dos estudantes entre os diferentes níveis de ensino nos institutos federais de educação. Revista Eletrônica de Administração e Turismo-ReAT, 13(2), 1-19.
Gardner, B. B.; Levy, S. J. (1955). The product and the brand. Harvard Business Review. 2 (33). 33-39.
Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin, 2(1), 66-70.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C.(2005). Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed., New Jersey: Pearson.
Hasan, B. (2010). Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 597–601.
Heitor, M. & Horta, H. (2014). Further democratizing Latin America: Broadening access to higher education and promoting science policies focused on the advanced training of human resources. Journal of technology management & innovation, 9 (4), p. 64-82.
Horta, H., Heitor, M. & Salmi, J. (2016). Trends and Challenges in Science and Higher Education. Springer International Publishing.
INEP - Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. (2018). Censo da educação superior 2017. Retrieved from http://www.inep.gov.br.
Jalaliyoon, N. & Taherdoost, H. (2012). Performance evaluation of higher education; a necessity. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5682–5686.
Kazoleas, D., Kim, Y. & Moffitt, M.A. (2001). Institutional image: a case study. Corporate Communications: an International Journal. 6 (4), p. 205-216.
Kennedy, S.H. (1977). Nurturing corporate images. European Journal of Marketing. 11 (3), 119-164.
Kuo, C.,Tang, M. (2013). Relationships among service quality, corporate image, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention for the elderly in high speed rail services. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 5 (47). 512-525.
Landry, B. J., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 87-99.
Levine, D. M., Stephan, D., Krehbiel, T. C., & Berenson, M. L. (2008). Estatística: Teorias e aplicações. Rio de Janeiro, BR: LTC.
Luque-Martínez, T., Del Barrio-García, S., Ibanez-Zapata, J. A., & Molina, M. Á. R. (2007). Modeling a city’s image: The case of Granada. Cities, 24(5), 335-352.
MEC – Ministério da Educação e Cultura. (2001) CNE: Apresentação. Retrieved from http://portal.mec.gov.br/cne/arquivos/pdf/2001/pces966_01.pdf.
Mohamadzadeh, M., Farzaneh, J., & Mousavi, M. (2012). Challenges and strategies for e-learning development in the Payame Noor University of Iran. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(1).
Moogan, Y. J. (2011). Can a higher education institution's marketing strategy improve the student-institution match? .International journal of educational management, 25(6), 570-589.
OECD. Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. OECD. 2016.
Palacio, A. B., Meneses, G. D., & Pérez, P. J. P. (2002). The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 486-505.
Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 25(2), 101-113.
Panthong, O. (2016). University Image Development for Phranakhon Rajabhat University. Sakon Nakon Graduate Studies Journal). 13 (61), 1-14.
Pascual-Miguel, F. J., Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., & Chaparro-Peláez, J. (2015). Influences of gender and product type on online purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1550-1556.
Roberts, L. M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image con¬struction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Man¬agement Review. 30, 685-711.
Rodríguez- Ardura, I., Meseguer- Artola, A. (2016) What leads people to keep on e-learning? An empirical analysis of users' experiences and their effects on continuance intention. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1030-1053.
Šneiderieneė, J. (2013). Virtual university image creation. Eletronic Learning, Information and Communication: Theory and Pratice. 1 (1).
Souza Neto, S. P.; Dias, T. R. F. V.; Boas A. A. V.; Brito, A. G., & Leite, G. S. M. (2010). Fatores de qualidade: Pontos positivos do emprego da tecnologia DL no curso de administração do consórcio CEDERJ – UFRRJ. In: Congresso Internacional Abed de Educação a Distância. 2010. CIAED.
Tubillejas, B., Cuadrado, M., & Frasquet, M. (2011). A model of determinant attributes of corporate image in cultural services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 356-376.
Uppal, M. A., ALI, S., Gulliver, S. R. (2018) Factors determining e‐learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412-426.
Waithaka, T. W., Kibera, F. N., & Munyoki, J. M. (2018). Corporate Image and Brand Performance of Kenyan Universities. AJBUMA Journal. 4(4), 68-80.
Wu, B. (2016). Identifying the influential factors of knowledge sharing in e-learning 2.0 systems. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS). 12(1), 85-102.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Fabio da Costa, Inayara Gonzalez, Anderson Pelissari, Vitor Azzari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
