Robotics as a tool to stem learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol2.iss10.248Abstract
Much has been written on the shortfalls in fully realizing the benefits of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education. STEM is important, because it pervades every aspect of our lives. Nevertheless, STEM education is considered as hard, dull, and without emotional meaning. This article examines how the use of robotics in education benefits STEM learning and how teachers can get started with a robotics program in schools. In this study, students develop their building and programming skills teamwork, and presentation skills, as well as touch on STEM subjects school students using the LEGO NXT Mindstorm programmable reconfigurable robot, to observe and learn abstract physics concepts and to perform different designed activities. Students work in teams toward the common goal of developing logical and creative solutions to problems. The results of the study indicated that there was a statistically significant difference in overall perceptions of assessments in STEM Semantics Perception Data, STEM Career Interest Scales and in the interview sessions. It is hoped that this program may set the stage for the transformation of the Malaysian education system which aspires to ensure that every student in every school in every state achieves their full potential, as stated in the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025.
References
Adolphson, K.V. (2002).Mathematical Embodiment Through Robotics Activities.
Doctoral Dissertation.University of Oklahoma.
Alejos, A.V., Santalla del Rio, V. Isasa, M.V., E. de Lorenzo, Cuinas, I. & Sanchez,M.G. (2012). ENXENO: LEGO© Robots from University Lab to K-12 Classroom . Retrieved, 6 May 2014, from http://www.eejournal.ktu.lt/index.php/elt/article/view/1184/1208
Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational Robotics: Open Questions And New Challenges
Themes in Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71.
Alimisis, D., Arlegui, J., Fava, N., Frangou, S., Ionita, S., Menegatti, E.,
Monfalcon,S., Moro, M., Papanikolaou, K. & Pina, A. (2010). Introducing Robotics to Teachers and Schools: Experiences from the TERECoP Project. Retrieved 7 May 2014, from http://hermes.di.uoa.gr/frangou/papers/eurologo%202010.pdf
Aziz Nordin. (2005) . Students’ Perception On Teaching And Learning Mathematics
In English. Buletin Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor, 14 (1).
Burhanuddin Mohd Salleh (2007). Adopting Problem-based Learning in the Teaching
of Engineering Undergraduates: A Malaysian Experience. International Conference on Engineering Education – ICEE 2007, Coimbra, Portugal. September 3 – 7, 2007. Retrieved 21 May 2014, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.127.8694&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Chew Cheng Meng, Noraini Idris & Leong Kwan Eu (2014). Secondary Students' Perceptions of Assessments in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 219-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1070a
Crawford, M.L. (2001). Teaching Contextually: Research, Rationale, and Techniques
for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Texas: CORD
Demo, G.B., Moro, M., Pina, A. Arlegui, J. (2012). In and Out of the School Activities Implementing IBSE and Constructionist Learning Methodologies By Robotics. Retrieved 27 June 2014 from http://www.di.unito.it/~barbara/MicRobot/Pubbl11/Sent-To-BBradley/DemoMoroPinaArleguiK24August.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0182-6.ch004
Eguchi, A. (2013). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 5-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/1
Executive Office of the President President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Report to the President Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Retrieved 5 July 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
Francis-Poscente, K. & Davis, B. (2013). Lego Robotics Teacher Professional
Learning. In Preciado Babb, A. P., Solares Rojas, A., Sandoval Cáceres, I. T., & Butto Zarzar, C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the First Meeting between the National Pedagogic University and the Faculty of Education of the University of Calgary,113-117, Calgary, Canada.
Goh, H. & Baharuddin Aris (2007). Using Robotics in Education: Lessons Learned
and Learning Experiences. Retrieved 23 March 2014, from http://eprints.utm.my/6015/1/149-henry.pdf
Gonzalez, H, B. & Kuenzi, J.J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer. Retrieved 20 May 2014, from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf
Gura, M. (2011). Getting Started with LEGO Robotics: A Guide for K-12
Educators. Retrieved 27 Oct. 2013, from http://www.iste.org/images/excerpts/ROBOTS-excerpt.pdf
Harel, I. (2003). Building Software Beats Using It. Retrieved 16 May 2014, from
http://www.mamamedia.com/areas/grownups/new/21_learning/building_software.html
Hidayah Mohd Fadzil & Rohaida Mohd Saat, (2014). Enhancing STEM Education during
School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,10(3), 209-218.[19] International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2012). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), 2011. Retrieved 19 June 2013, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/table11_5.asp
Johnson, J. (2003). Children, Robotics and Education. Artificial Life and Robotics, 7, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480880
-21.
Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2011). Contrasting Perceptions of
STEM Content and Careers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 92-117.
Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Tyler-Wood, T. & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013).
Impact of Environmental Power Monitoring Activities on Middle School Student Perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98-123.
Lantz Jr., H.B. (2009). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
Education What Form? What Function? Retrieved 25 April 2014, from http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf
Lilia Halim, Fathiyah Dahlan, Treagust, D.F. & Chandrasegaran, A.L. (2012).
Experiences of Teaching the Heat Energy Topic in English as a Second Language. Science Education International, 23(2), 117-132.
Loh Sau Cheong, Loo Chu Kiong , Loh Hock Chuan & Lim Yoke Kit. (2013).
Transformative Robotic Education for the Realization of Malaysia National Philosophy of Education , In K. Omar et al. (Eds.): FIRA 2013, CCIS 376, 416–426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40409-2_35
Maxwell, B. A. & Meeden L. A. (2010). Integrating Robotics Research
with Undergraduate Education. Retrieved 9 May 2014, from http://www.cs.swarthmore.edu/~meeden/papers/IEEErobot-education.pdf
Mazur, E. (1999 ). Understanding or memorization: Are we teaching the right thing?
Retrieved 29 March 2014, from http://sdsu-physics.org/sdsu_per/articles/Mazurpubs_89.pdf
Mnistry of Education Malaysia. (2005). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary
Schools, Curriculum Specification Science Form 4. Curriculum Development Centre, Kuala Lumpur.
MOSTI. (2008). Malaysian Science & Technology Indicators ; 2008 Report.Malaysia
:MASTIC
Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Suleman Shahid,, Abdullah Al Mahmud & Jian-Jie Dong.
(2013). A Review of The Applicability of Robots in Education. Retrieved 3 March 2014, from http://roila.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/209-0015.pdf
Nafisah @ Kamariah Md Kamaruddin & Nurul Qamar Hazni. (2005). The
Implementation of Problem Solving Skill in KUITTHO. Retrieved 21 June 2014, from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/naf05192.pdf
Nagel, D. (2013). 6 Technology Challenges Facing Education. Retrieved 7 Feb 2014, from http://thejournal.com/articles/2013/06/04/6-technology-challenges-facing-education.aspx
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results in Focus : What 15-Year-Olds Know
and What They Can Do With What They Know. Retrieved 11 Dec 2013, from
http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Papert, S. (1971). Teaching Children Thinking. Artifical Intelligence. Cambridge : Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Perteet, B. (2005). A Multi-Vehicle Framework for the Development of Robotic Games : The Marco Polo Case. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
Salmiza Saleh. (2011). The Level of B.Sc.Ed Students’ Conceptual Understanding ofNewtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 249-256.
Stager, G.S. (2001). Computationally-Rich Constructionism and At-risk Learners Paper presented at the 2001 World Conference on Computers in Education July 31, 2001 Copenhagen, Denmark
Stephen, M.L., Bracey, G. & Locke, S. (2012). Teaching and Learning in a 21st
Century, Technology-Rich STEM Classroom. Retrieved 19 April 2014, from http://www.isteconference.org/2012/uploads/KEY_70221039/ISTE2012_STEM_Classroom_RP.pdf
Implementation. Doctor of Education Dissertation, East Tennessee State University.
Turner, K.B.(2013). Northeast Tennessee Educators’ Perception of STEM Education
Implementation. Doctor of Education Dissertation, East Tennessee State University
UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and Learning: Achieving Quality for All. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Verner, I.M. & Ahlgren, D.J. (2004). Robot Contest as a Laboratory for Experiential Engineering Education. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(2), 1-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1071620.1071622
Whitehead, S.H., (2010). Relationship of Robotic Implementation on Changes in
Middle School Students’ Beliefs and Interest Toward Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Doctor of Education Dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Henry Goh, Mohamad Bin Bilal Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Christina John, Mohamad Bin Bilal Ali, Education Technology Policy In Teaching And Learning , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research