Knowledge, attitude and influential factors in decision-making and organization of ecological based production systems of bananas in the Atlantic Forest of Rio Grande do Sul – Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss2.3623Keywords:
Decision-making, Attitude, Influential internal factors, Production systems, Social system, Atlantic ForestAbstract
The main proposal of this work was to comprehend how internal factors influence the knowledge and decision-making of the farmers. Therefore, the production systems of ecological basis of banana in the Atlantic Forest in the state of Rio Grande do Sul – Brazil was observed. For that, 53 interviews have been carried out, which composed a non-probabilistic sample, and the data generated was analyzed through statistics and multivariate analysis tools. The results generated evidence for the comprehension that, in the organization of production systems, by the farmers, there is an important influence of their personal experiences and their values more closely connected to satisfaction and succession. Finally, it was observed that the elaborate construction of this work, considering the means of production, information system and regime of values, may be employed in different production systems.
References
BEEDELL, J.D.C.; REHNAM, T., 1999. Explaining Farmers’ Conservation Behavior: Why Do Farmers Behave the Way They Do? Journal of Environmental Management,57, 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0296
BURTON, R.J.F., 2004. Reconceptualising the “Behavioral Approach” in Agricultural Studies: A Socio-Psychological Perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 359-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.12.001
CEZAR, I. M., 1999. A Participatory Knowledge Information System for Beef Farmers: A Case Applied to the State of Mato Grosso do Sul. 1999. 324f. Thesis (Socioeconomy Doctorate) – Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
CITROEN, C.L., 2011. The role of information in strategic decision making. InternationalJournal of Information Management, 31, 6, 493-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.005
DUFUMIER, M., 1996. Les projets de développement agricole:manual d'expertise. Paris: Karthalaet CTA.
ERRINGTON, A.; GASSON, R., 1994. Farming Systems and the Farm Family Business. In: DENT. J.B; MCGREGOR, M. J. (Eds.),Rural and farming Systems Analysis European Perspectives (181-192). UK: CabInternational.
FIELD, A., 2009. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. (2thed). Porto Alegre:Artmed.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAO. FAOSTAT-Production. 2009. retrieved from: <http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx>.
GASSON, R. et al., 1988. The Farm as a Family Business: A Review. Journal of Agriculture Economics, 39, 1-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00560.x
GASSON, R., 1973. Goals and Values of Farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 24, 3, 521-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1973.tb00952.x
GASSON, R.; ERRINGTON., 1993. A. The Farm Family Business.Wallingford, UK:Cab International.
GASSON, R; POTTER, C., 1988. Conservation Through Land Diversion: a Survey of Farmers Attitudes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39, 3, 340-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00593.x
HAIR, J. F. et al., 2009. Análise multivariada de dados. (6thed.) Porto Alegre: Artmed.
JANIS, I.L; MANN, L., 1977. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York:Free.
KOCHEN, M., 1974. Principles of Information Retrieval. New York: John Wiley.
Lewin, K.(1965). Teoria de campo em ciência social. São Paulo: Pioneira.
MACHADO, J.A.D.; OLIVEIRA, L.M.; SCHNORRENBERGER, A., 2006, july. Compreendendo a tomada de decisão do produtor rural. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA ADMINISTRAÇÃO E SOCIOLOGIA RURAL, 54., 2006, Fortaleza.
MALHOTRA, N.K., 2001. Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada. (3thed.)Porto Alegre: Bookman.
MIZZARO, S., 1996. ACognitive Analysis of Information Retrieval. In: INGWERSEN, P; PORS, N.O. (Eds),Information Science: Integration In Perspective (pp. 233-250). Copenhagen: The Royal School of Librarianship.
PERKIN, P.; REHMAN, T., 1994. Farmer’s Objectives and Their Interactions with Business and Life Styles: Evidence From Berkshire, England. In: DENT. J.B; MCGREGOR, M. J. (Eds.). Rural and farming Systems Analysis European Perspectives (pp. 193-212).UK: CabInternational.
RODRIGUES, A.; ASSMAR, E.M.; JABLONSKI, B., 2010. Psicologia social. Rio de Janeiro:Vozes.
RODRÍGUEZ OCAÑA, A., 1996. Propuesta metodológica para el análisis de la toma de decisiones de los agricultores: aplicación al caso del regadío extensivo cordobés. 221 f. Tesis Doctoral – Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba.
ROMERO, C.; REHMAN, T., 2003. Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
SIMON, H. A., 1970. Comportamento administrativo:estudo dos processos decisórios nas organizações administrativas. Rio de Janeiro:Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Daniela Garcez Wives, João Armando Dessimon Machado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2022-01-01
Published 2022-02-01