Knowledge, attitude and influential factors in decision-making and organization of ecological based production systems of bananas in the Atlantic Forest of Rio Grande do Sul – Brazil

Daniela Garcez Wives; João Armando Dessimon  Machado

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss2.3623

Authors

Daniela Garcez Wives Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9372-2747
João Armando Dessimon Machado PGDR https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9864-897X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss2.3623

Keywords:

Decision-making, Attitude, Influential internal factors, Production systems, Social system, Atlantic Forest

Abstract

The main proposal of this work was to comprehend how internal factors influence the knowledge and decision-making of the farmers. Therefore, the production systems of ecological basis of banana in the Atlantic Forest in the state of Rio Grande do Sul – Brazil was observed. For that, 53 interviews have been carried out, which composed a non-probabilistic sample, and the data generated was analyzed through statistics and multivariate analysis tools. The results generated evidence for the comprehension that, in the organization of production systems, by the farmers, there is an important influence of their personal experiences and their values more closely connected to satisfaction and succession. Finally, it was observed that the elaborate construction of this work, considering the means of production, information system and regime of values, may be employed in different production systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

João Armando Dessimon Machado, PGDR

Prof. DR - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Rural (PGDR)

References

BEEDELL, J.D.C.; REHNAM, T., 1999. Explaining Farmers’ Conservation Behavior: Why Do Farmers Behave the Way They Do? Journal of Environmental Management,57, 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0296

BURTON, R.J.F., 2004. Reconceptualising the “Behavioral Approach” in Agricultural Studies: A Socio-Psychological Perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 359-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.12.001

CEZAR, I. M., 1999. A Participatory Knowledge Information System for Beef Farmers: A Case Applied to the State of Mato Grosso do Sul. 1999. 324f. Thesis (Socioeconomy Doctorate) – Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

CITROEN, C.L., 2011. The role of information in strategic decision making. InternationalJournal of Information Management, 31, 6, 493-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.005

DUFUMIER, M., 1996. Les projets de développement agricole:manual d'expertise. Paris: Karthalaet CTA.

ERRINGTON, A.; GASSON, R., 1994. Farming Systems and the Farm Family Business. In: DENT. J.B; MCGREGOR, M. J. (Eds.),Rural and farming Systems Analysis European Perspectives (181-192). UK: CabInternational.

FIELD, A., 2009. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. (2thed). Porto Alegre:Artmed.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAO. FAOSTAT-Production. 2009. retrieved from: <http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx>.

GASSON, R. et al., 1988. The Farm as a Family Business: A Review. Journal of Agriculture Economics, 39, 1-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00560.x

GASSON, R., 1973. Goals and Values of Farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 24, 3, 521-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1973.tb00952.x

GASSON, R.; ERRINGTON., 1993. A. The Farm Family Business.Wallingford, UK:Cab International.

GASSON, R; POTTER, C., 1988. Conservation Through Land Diversion: a Survey of Farmers Attitudes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39, 3, 340-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1988.tb00593.x

HAIR, J. F. et al., 2009. Análise multivariada de dados. (6thed.) Porto Alegre: Artmed.

JANIS, I.L; MANN, L., 1977. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York:Free.

KOCHEN, M., 1974. Principles of Information Retrieval. New York: John Wiley.

Lewin, K.(1965). Teoria de campo em ciência social. São Paulo: Pioneira.

MACHADO, J.A.D.; OLIVEIRA, L.M.; SCHNORRENBERGER, A., 2006, july. Compreendendo a tomada de decisão do produtor rural. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA ADMINISTRAÇÃO E SOCIOLOGIA RURAL, 54., 2006, Fortaleza.

MALHOTRA, N.K., 2001. Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada. (3thed.)Porto Alegre: Bookman.

MIZZARO, S., 1996. ACognitive Analysis of Information Retrieval. In: INGWERSEN, P; PORS, N.O. (Eds),Information Science: Integration In Perspective (pp. 233-250). Copenhagen: The Royal School of Librarianship.

PERKIN, P.; REHMAN, T., 1994. Farmer’s Objectives and Their Interactions with Business and Life Styles: Evidence From Berkshire, England. In: DENT. J.B; MCGREGOR, M. J. (Eds.). Rural and farming Systems Analysis European Perspectives (pp. 193-212).UK: CabInternational.

RODRIGUES, A.; ASSMAR, E.M.; JABLONSKI, B., 2010. Psicologia social. Rio de Janeiro:Vozes.

RODRÍGUEZ OCAÑA, A., 1996. Propuesta metodológica para el análisis de la toma de decisiones de los agricultores: aplicación al caso del regadío extensivo cordobés. 221 f. Tesis Doctoral – Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba.

ROMERO, C.; REHMAN, T., 2003. Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

SIMON, H. A., 1970. Comportamento administrativo:estudo dos processos decisórios nas organizações administrativas. Rio de Janeiro:Fundação Getúlio Vargas