Students’ Understanding of Liıght Concepts ın the Secondary School

Authors

  • P.R.K.A Vitharana University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss6.377

Abstract

Learning science is a complex process and students develop limited understanding even after instruction. The aim of the research is to use students’ diagrams to assess conceptual understanding of science related to ‘light’ in grade eight students. Data were collected with the use of a written test, questionnaire and documents. Each question of the written test consisted of two parts; diagram and written explanation. Data obtained were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. It was noted that students provided more than twenty different diagrams for each question instead of correct diagram. A large number of incorrect diagrams with incorrect explanations showed that students did not possess a correct understanding of concepts related to light. Responses to teacher questionnaire revealed that 98% of teachers provide opportunities for their students to draw diagrams to assess understanding of science. Students’ diagrams can be effectively used to assess conceptual understanding of science knowledge of secondary students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • P.R.K.A Vitharana, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

    Department of Education, Faculty of Arts

References

Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., McNall, R. (2005). Elementary teachers understanding of standards-based light concepts before and after instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX, April 5-7.

Berkhimer, G. D., Anderson, C. W., and Smith, E. L. (1988). Unit planning for conceptual change . East Lansing: Institute of research in teaching.

Blizak, D., Chafiqi, F., Kendil, D., Students misconceptions about light in Algeria. [Online] Available: http//spie.org/etop/2009/etop200. 4.735pdf. (October 25,2013) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/ETOP.2009.EMA5

Duit, R., and Treaguat, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning, International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016

Harlen, W. (1992). The teaching of science, London: David Fulton publishers.

Harlen, W., & Jelly, S. (1989). Developing science in the primary classroom, Singapore: Longman.[7] Hirca, N,. Calik, M., and Akdeniz, F. (2008). Investigating grade eight students’ conceptions of “Energy” and related concepts. Journal of Turkish ScienceEeducation, 5(1):75-87.

Joyce (2006). Drawing. [Online] Available: http:arb.nzcer.org.nz/strategies/drawing.php (November 20, 2013)

Sahın, C., Ipek, H., Ayas, A. (2008). Students understanding of light concepts primary school: A cross-age study. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. Vol 9 (I), [Online]Available: http//www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/vqissue1 files/sahin.pdf (Nonember 04, 2013)

Thinking about light [Online] Availble: http://www.umich.edu/rigisml/light/assess_sources.pdf (October 20, 20013)

Thurston, A., Gran, G.T., Topping, K. J. (2006). Constructing understanding in primary science: An exploration of process and outcomes in the topic areas of light and th earth in space. Electronic Journal of Rresearch in Educational Psychology. No. 8, Vol 4 (1), 1-34.

Uzun, S., Alez N., and Karal, I. S. ( 2013) A cross-age study of an understanding of light and sight concepts in physics. Science Education International Vol 24, 129-149.

Vitharana, P. R. K. A. (2006). Teaching ‘Environment Related Activities’ at key stage one to help children in developing science process skills to attain scientific literacy in future. Sri Lanka. Ph. D. thesis, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

White, R., and Gunstone, R. (1992) Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-01

How to Cite

Vitharana, P. (2015). Students’ Understanding of Liıght Concepts ın the Secondary School. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(6), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol3.iss6.377