3D printing as a tool in anatomy teaching
An integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss6.3771Keywords:
Anatomy, 3D printing, Medicine, Morphology, TeachingAbstract
Anatomy is essentially a three-dimensional content and learning its structures, through 3D impressions, for example, is of notable importance. In this context, traditional teaching methods, despite being highly effective, still have some limitations. Therefore, 3D printing has been introduced in the teaching of Anatomy, bringing several advantages, such as accuracy, personalized study and easy handling. Based on these premises, the objective of this work was to carry out an integrative review on the use of 3D printing in the teaching of human anatomy. A study was carried out in science direct, PUBMED, Scielo databases between 2010 and 2021 using the following descriptors 3D printing and teaching of anatomy. It was found that among the benefits of using 3D parts, there are: accuracy, durability, ease of production, good cost-benefit ratio and reduction of security risks linked to the fixation of cadaver and plastinated specimens. It was observed that in some studies most students preferred the use of 3D printing to traditional methods. Other studies have shown the importance of the use of 3D printing as a complementary tool to traditional methods of teaching anatomy. It was found that the use of 3D printing as a teaching tool may reduce the demand for bodies and overcome some of the governmental legal and ethical problems in the cadaver study, further studies should be carried out to assess the long-term impact of using 3D printing.
References
Y. AbouHashem, M. Dayal, S. Savanah, and G. Štrkalj, “The application of 3D printing in anatomy education,” Medical Education Online, vol. 20, no. 1, 2015, pp. 29847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29847
K.E.M. Rodrigues, K.A. Lucas, A.L.L. Cordeiro, R.P.M. Silva, F.G.A. Santos, and Y.K. de Carvalho, “3D models of nonunion fractures in long bones as education tools,” Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, 2021, pp. e114820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm114820
R.C. Lazinho, M.A. Miglino, and J.R. Ferreira, “Análise crítica e subjetiva dos conteúdos da anatomia topográfica ensinados na Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo e uma proposta de adequação baseada na realidade profissional contemporânea,” Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, vol. 41, no. 3, 2004, pp. 173–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-95962004000300005
C.H.A.L. Massari, Y.K. de Carvalho, and M.A. Miglino, “3D printing of brachycephalic and dolichocephalic canine skulls and mandibles: a complement to traditional osteotechnique,” Acta Veterinaria Brasilica, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021, pp. 173–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21708/avb.2021.15.2.9842
J.W. Adams, L. Paxton, K. Dawes, K. Burlak, M. Quayle, and P.G. McMenamin, “3D printed reproductions of orbital dissections: a novel mode of visualising anatomy for trainees in ophthalmology or optometry,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 9, 2015, pp. 1162–1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306189
P.G. Mcmenamin, M.R. Quayle, C.R. Mchenry, and J.W. Adams, “The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 6, 2014, pp. 479–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475
J. Soares Neto, M.L.L. Barbosa, H.L. Matos, A.R. Xavier, G.S. Cerqueira, and E.P. de Souza, “Um estudo sobre a tecnologia 3D aplicada ao ensino de anatomia: uma revisão integrativa,” Research, Society and Development, vol. 9, no. 11, 2020, p. e7489119301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9301
P.S. Oliveira, J.D. Lucena, F.R.O. da Silva, K.M.B. Leal, J.N.F.M. Gusmão, O.P.C. Sobrinho, J.E.F. Barreto, D.V.S. Costa, A.G. Scafuri, D.V. Gondim, G.S. Cerqueira, “The teaching of human anatomy in Brazil: the reality of northeast Brazil” International Journal of Anatomy and Research, vol. 5, no. 4.2, 2017, pp. 4623–4629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.423
Z. Ye, A. Dun, H. Jiang, C. Nie, S. Zhao, T. Wang, j. Zhai, “The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, pp. 335-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x
D. Chytas, E.O. Johnson, M. Piagkou, G. Tsakotos, G.C. Babis, V.S. Nicolaou, K. Markatos, K. Natsis, “Three-dimensional printing in anatomy teaching: current evidence,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2020 42:7, vol. 42, no. 7, 2020, pp. 835–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02470-2
S. Chen, Z. Pan, Y. Wu, Z. Gu, M. Li, Z. Liang, H. Zhu, Y. Yao, W. Shui, Z. Shen, J. Zhao, H. Pan, “The role of three-dimensional printed models of skull in anatomy education: a randomized controlled trail,” Scientific Reports 2017 7:1, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00647-1
J. Skrzat, M. J. Zdilla, P. Brzegowy, and M. Hołda, “3D printed replica of the human temporal bone intended for teaching gross anatomy,” FOLIA MEDICA CRACOVIENSIA, vol. LIX, 2019, pp. 23–30.
X. Kong, L. Nie, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, Q. Ye, L. Tang, W. Huang, J. Li, “Do 3D Printing Models Improve Anatomical Teaching About Hepatic Segments to Medical Students? A Randomized Controlled Study,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 40, no. 8, 2016, pp. 1969–1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3541-y
Y. Chen, C. Qian, R. Shen, D. Wu, L. Bian, H. Qu, X. Fan, Z. Liu, Y. Li, J. Xia, “3D Printing Technology Improves Medical Interns’ Understanding of Anatomy of Gastrocolic Trunk,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 77, no. 5, 2020, pp. 1279–1284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.031
K. H. A. Lim, Z. Y. Loo, S. J. Goldie, J. W. Adams, and P. G. McMenamin, “Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 9, no. 3, 2016, pp. 213–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573
C. Fleming, M. S. Sadaghiani, M. A. Stellon, and R. Javan, “Effectiveness of Three-Dimensionally Printed Models in Anatomy Education for Medical Students and Resident Physicians: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 17, no. 10, 2020, pp. 1220–1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.030
W. Clifton, A. Damon, C. Soares, E. Nottmeier, and M. Pichelmann, “Investigation of a three-dimensional printed dynamic cervical spine model for anatomy and physiology education,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 34, no. 1, 2021, pp. 30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23607
C. Erolin, “Interactive 3D Digital Models for Anatomy and Medical Education,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1138, 2019, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14227-8_1
M. Vaccarezza and V. Papa, “LETTER TO THE EDITOR 3D printing: a valuable resource in human anatomy education,” Anat Sci Int, vol. 90, no. 1, 2014, pp. 64–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-014-0257-7
S. Backhouse, D. Taylor, and J. A. Armitage, “Is This Mine to Keep? Three-dimensional Printing Enables Active, Personalized Learning in Anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 12, no. 5, 2019, pp. 518–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1840
J. C. Young, M. R. Quayle, J. W. Adams, J. F. Bertram, and P. G. McMenamin, “Three-Dimensional Printing of Archived Human Fetal Material for Teaching Purposes,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019, pp. 90–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1805
SOARES NETO, J. .; SANTOS, M. J. C. dos .; CERQUEIRA, G. S. .; SOUZA, E. P. de . The Fedathi Sequence and the use of 3D digital technologies as methodological resources for teaching human anatomy: an integrative review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 10, p., 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8141
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joao Erivan Façanha Barreto, Bruna Sobreira Kubrusly, Cezar Nilton Rabelo Lemos Filho, Renata Souza Silva, Samuel de Osterno Façanha , Júlio César Claudino dos Santos, Gilberto Santos Cerqueira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2022-05-09
Published 2022-06-01
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Fernanda Maria Almeida do Carmo, José Airton de Oliveira Faustino, Maria Vanísia Mendonça de Lima, Milínia Stephanie Nogueira Barbosa Felício, Hermínio Borges Neto, Gilberto Santos Cerqueira, The Didactic Contract from the Perspective of the Theory of Didactical Situations , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 8 No. 7 (2020): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research
- Francisca Antonia Marcilane Gonçalves Cruz, Luisiane Frota Correia Lima Ramalho, Francisco Arnaldo Lopes Bezerra, Bárbara Rainara Maia Silva, Cristiane Soares Gonçalves, Natanael Martins de Sousa, Gilberto Santos Cerqueira, Teacher training , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 9 No. 9 (2021): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research
- Orcini Costa, Roberta Costa, Renata Souza, Glessiane Prata, Gilberto Cerqueira, Emmanuel Prata, Anatomy Classroom , International Journal for Innovation Education and Research: Vol. 10 No. 6 (2022): International Journal for Innovation Education and Research