3D printing as a tool in anatomy teaching

An integrative review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss6.3771

Keywords:

Anatomy, 3D printing, Medicine, Morphology, Teaching

Abstract

Anatomy is essentially a three-dimensional content and learning its structures, through 3D impressions, for example, is of notable importance. In this context, traditional teaching methods, despite being highly effective, still have some limitations. Therefore, 3D printing has been introduced in the teaching of Anatomy, bringing several advantages, such as accuracy, personalized study and easy handling. Based on these premises, the objective of this work was to carry out an integrative review on the use of 3D printing in the teaching of human anatomy. A study was carried out in science direct, PUBMED, Scielo databases between 2010 and 2021 using the following descriptors 3D printing and teaching of anatomy. It was found that among the benefits of using 3D parts, there are: accuracy, durability, ease of production, good cost-benefit ratio and reduction of security risks linked to the fixation of cadaver and plastinated specimens. It was observed that in some studies most students preferred the use of 3D printing to traditional methods. Other studies have shown the importance of the use of 3D printing as a complementary tool to traditional methods of teaching anatomy. It was found that the use of 3D printing as a teaching tool may reduce the demand for bodies and overcome some of the governmental legal and ethical problems in the cadaver study, further studies should be carried out to assess the long-term impact of using 3D printing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Joao Erivan Façanha Barreto, Universidade Federal do Ceará

    Postgraduate Program in Morpho functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Morphology.

    Medicine Course, Centro Universitário Christus, Fortaleza Brazil.

  • Bruna Sobreira Kubrusly, Universidade Federal do Ceará

    Faculty of Medicine

  • Cezar Nilton Rabelo Lemos Filho, Universidade Federal do Ceará

    Faculty of Medicine

  • Renata Souza Silva, Universidade Federal do Ceará

    Postgraduate Program in Morpho functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Morphology.

     

  • Samuel de Osterno Façanha , Centro Universitário Christus

    Postgraduate Program in Morpho functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Ceará.

    Medicine Course, Centro Universitário Christus.

  • Júlio César Claudino dos Santos, Centro Universitário Christus

    Medicine Course

  • Gilberto Santos Cerqueira, Universidade Federal do Ceará

    Postgraduate Program in Morphofunctional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Morphology

    Medicine Course, Centro Universitário Christus, Fortaleza Brazil

References

Y. AbouHashem, M. Dayal, S. Savanah, and G. Štrkalj, “The application of 3D printing in anatomy education,” Medical Education Online, vol. 20, no. 1, 2015, pp. 29847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29847

K.E.M. Rodrigues, K.A. Lucas, A.L.L. Cordeiro, R.P.M. Silva, F.G.A. Santos, and Y.K. de Carvalho, “3D models of nonunion fractures in long bones as education tools,” Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, 2021, pp. e114820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm114820

R.C. Lazinho, M.A. Miglino, and J.R. Ferreira, “Análise crítica e subjetiva dos conteúdos da anatomia topográfica ensinados na Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo e uma proposta de adequação baseada na realidade profissional contemporânea,” Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, vol. 41, no. 3, 2004, pp. 173–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-95962004000300005

C.H.A.L. Massari, Y.K. de Carvalho, and M.A. Miglino, “3D printing of brachycephalic and dolichocephalic canine skulls and mandibles: a complement to traditional osteotechnique,” Acta Veterinaria Brasilica, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021, pp. 173–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21708/avb.2021.15.2.9842

J.W. Adams, L. Paxton, K. Dawes, K. Burlak, M. Quayle, and P.G. McMenamin, “3D printed reproductions of orbital dissections: a novel mode of visualising anatomy for trainees in ophthalmology or optometry,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 9, 2015, pp. 1162–1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306189

P.G. Mcmenamin, M.R. Quayle, C.R. Mchenry, and J.W. Adams, “The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 6, 2014, pp. 479–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1475

J. Soares Neto, M.L.L. Barbosa, H.L. Matos, A.R. Xavier, G.S. Cerqueira, and E.P. de Souza, “Um estudo sobre a tecnologia 3D aplicada ao ensino de anatomia: uma revisão integrativa,” Research, Society and Development, vol. 9, no. 11, 2020, p. e7489119301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9301

P.S. Oliveira, J.D. Lucena, F.R.O. da Silva, K.M.B. Leal, J.N.F.M. Gusmão, O.P.C. Sobrinho, J.E.F. Barreto, D.V.S. Costa, A.G. Scafuri, D.V. Gondim, G.S. Cerqueira, “The teaching of human anatomy in Brazil: the reality of northeast Brazil” International Journal of Anatomy and Research, vol. 5, no. 4.2, 2017, pp. 4623–4629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.423

Z. Ye, A. Dun, H. Jiang, C. Nie, S. Zhao, T. Wang, j. Zhai, “The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, pp. 335-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x

D. Chytas, E.O. Johnson, M. Piagkou, G. Tsakotos, G.C. Babis, V.S. Nicolaou, K. Markatos, K. Natsis, “Three-dimensional printing in anatomy teaching: current evidence,” Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2020 42:7, vol. 42, no. 7, 2020, pp. 835–841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02470-2

S. Chen, Z. Pan, Y. Wu, Z. Gu, M. Li, Z. Liang, H. Zhu, Y. Yao, W. Shui, Z. Shen, J. Zhao, H. Pan, “The role of three-dimensional printed models of skull in anatomy education: a randomized controlled trail,” Scientific Reports 2017 7:1, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00647-1

J. Skrzat, M. J. Zdilla, P. Brzegowy, and M. Hołda, “3D printed replica of the human temporal bone intended for teaching gross anatomy,” FOLIA MEDICA CRACOVIENSIA, vol. LIX, 2019, pp. 23–30.

X. Kong, L. Nie, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, Q. Ye, L. Tang, W. Huang, J. Li, “Do 3D Printing Models Improve Anatomical Teaching About Hepatic Segments to Medical Students? A Randomized Controlled Study,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 40, no. 8, 2016, pp. 1969–1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3541-y

Y. Chen, C. Qian, R. Shen, D. Wu, L. Bian, H. Qu, X. Fan, Z. Liu, Y. Li, J. Xia, “3D Printing Technology Improves Medical Interns’ Understanding of Anatomy of Gastrocolic Trunk,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 77, no. 5, 2020, pp. 1279–1284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.031

K. H. A. Lim, Z. Y. Loo, S. J. Goldie, J. W. Adams, and P. G. McMenamin, “Use of 3D printed models in medical education: A randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 9, no. 3, 2016, pp. 213–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1573

C. Fleming, M. S. Sadaghiani, M. A. Stellon, and R. Javan, “Effectiveness of Three-Dimensionally Printed Models in Anatomy Education for Medical Students and Resident Physicians: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 17, no. 10, 2020, pp. 1220–1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.030

W. Clifton, A. Damon, C. Soares, E. Nottmeier, and M. Pichelmann, “Investigation of a three-dimensional printed dynamic cervical spine model for anatomy and physiology education,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 34, no. 1, 2021, pp. 30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23607

C. Erolin, “Interactive 3D Digital Models for Anatomy and Medical Education,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1138, 2019, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14227-8_1

M. Vaccarezza and V. Papa, “LETTER TO THE EDITOR 3D printing: a valuable resource in human anatomy education,” Anat Sci Int, vol. 90, no. 1, 2014, pp. 64–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-014-0257-7

S. Backhouse, D. Taylor, and J. A. Armitage, “Is This Mine to Keep? Three-dimensional Printing Enables Active, Personalized Learning in Anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 12, no. 5, 2019, pp. 518–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1840

J. C. Young, M. R. Quayle, J. W. Adams, J. F. Bertram, and P. G. McMenamin, “Three-Dimensional Printing of Archived Human Fetal Material for Teaching Purposes,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019, pp. 90–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1805

SOARES NETO, J. .; SANTOS, M. J. C. dos .; CERQUEIRA, G. S. .; SOUZA, E. P. de . The Fedathi Sequence and the use of 3D digital technologies as methodological resources for teaching human anatomy: an integrative review. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 10, p., 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8141

Downloads

Published

2022-06-01

How to Cite

Barreto, J. E. F. ., Kubrusly, B. S. ., Lemos Filho, C. N. R. ., Silva, R. S. . ., Façanha , S. de O. ., Santos, J. C. C. dos ., & Cerqueira, G. S. (2022). 3D printing as a tool in anatomy teaching: An integrative review. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 10(6), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss6.3771
Received 2022-04-15
Accepted 2022-05-09
Published 2022-06-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)