The Analysis of the degree of risk of R&DI projects using fuzzy logic to identify technical feasibility

Kleber de Lima Pontes; Manoel Henrique Reis Nascimento

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss8.3870

Authors

Kleber de Lima Pontes Institute of Technology and Education Galileo of the Amazon https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4311-8298
Manoel Henrique Reis Nascimento Institute of Technology and Education Galileo of the Amazon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss8.3870

Keywords:

Project Management, Fuzzy Logic, Risk Management

Abstract

Currently, business structures are increasingly focused on pursuit of continuous improvement in their processes so that organizations can remain competitive in the market, since customers require more and more products or services with high quality levels. With the reference this scenario, this work brings a methodology of analysis of the risk of R&DI (Research, Development and Innovation) projects, using the fuzzy mathematical model, developed in an organization whose core business is the research and development of new technologies. This analysis occurs through the development of linguistic variables (input), with the aim of identifying measure the degree of risk in projects. After the determination of the guidelines to be followed, it was possible to obtain results that demonstrate that the developed fuzzy model can assist in the identification and prioritization of the variables that increase the degree of risk of technologies development projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kleber de Lima Pontes, Institute of Technology and Education Galileo of the Amazon

Academic, of the Post Graduate Program in Engineering, Process Management, Systems and Environmental (PGP.EPMSE)
Manoel Henrique Reis Nascimento, Institute of Technology and Education Galileo of the Amazon

Professor, of the Postgraduate Program in Engineering, Process Management, Systems and Environmental (PGP.EPMSE)

References

ALAM TABRIZ, A.; HAMZEI, E. Analysis & Assessment project risks by integrated approach to risk management in PMBOK standard and RFMEA method. Journal of Industrial Management, vol. 1, p. 20-33, 2011.

ARYA, V.; KUMAR, S. Knowledge measure and entropy: a complementary concept in fuzzy theory. Granular Computing, v. 6, no. 3, p. 631-643, 2020. ISSN 2364-49662364-4974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00221-7

BARGHI, B.; SHADROKH SIKARI, S. Qualitative and quantitative project risk assessment using a hybrid PMBOK model developed under uncertainty conditions. Heliyon, v. 6, no. 1, p. e03097, Jan 2020. ISSN 2405-8440 (Print) 2405-8440 (Linking). Available at: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922046>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03097

BONVICINI, S.; LIONELLI, P.; SPADONI, G. Risk analysis of hazardous materials transportation evaluating uncertainty by means of fuzzy logic. Journal of Hazardous Materials, v. 62, p. 59-74, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00158-7

CHUTIA, R.; GOGOI, MK Fuzzy risk analysis in poultry farming based on a novel similarity measure of fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, v. 66, p. 60-76, 2018. ISSN 15684946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.008

COX, E. The fuzzy systems handbook: a practitioner's guide to building, using, and maintaining fuzzy systems. Academic Press Professional, Inc., 1994. ISBN 0121942708.

DO CARMO CORREA, SDJ; DA SILVEIRA, AM Adaptive neuro-fuzzy model for productive chains assessment: A study of the broiler productive chain in Brazil. 2012 XXXVIII Latin American Conference on Informatics (CLEI), 2012, IEEE. p.1-10.

FAN, Z.-P.; LI, Y.-H.; ZHANG, Y. Generating project risk response strategies based on CBR: A case study. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 42, no. 6, p. 2870-2883, 2015. ISSN 09574174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.034

FANG, C.; MARLE, F.; XIE, M. Applying Importance Measures to Risk Analysis in Engineering Project Using a Risk Network Model. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, p. 1548-1556, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2016.2536701

FERNANDES, RT Supervision of a Hybrid Wind/Diesel System using Fuzzy Logic. 2005.

JANTZEN, J. Design of fuzzy controllers. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Automation, Bldg, v. 326, p. 362-367, 1998.

LOPES, WA; JAFELICE, RSDM; BARROS, LC Fuzzy modeling of medical diagnosis and monitoring of pneumonia treatment. Biomathematics Magazine, v. 15, p. 77-96, 2005.

MAMDANI, EH Applications of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. process Iee, v. 121, p. 1585-1588, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1974.0328

MARAJ, A.; SHATRI, B.; RUGOVA, S. Selection of Defuzzification method for routing metrics in MPLS network to obtain better crisp values for link optimization. Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on System Science and Simulation in Engineering (ICOSSSE 2008), 2008. p.200-205.

MOZELLI, LA Fuzzy control for takaki-sugeno systems: improved conditions and applications. 2008.

MURIANA, C.; VIZZINI, G. Project risk management: A deterministic quantitative technique for assessment and mitigation. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 320-340, 2017. ISSN 02637863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.010

PASSINO, KM; YURKOVICH, S.; REINFRANK, M. Fuzzy control. Citeseer, 1998.

PEREIRA, AA Water Quality Assessment: Proposal for a New Index Based on Fuzzy Logic. P. 1-171, September, 13 2010.

PEREIRA, JCA Application and Analysis of the Fuzzy Hierarchical Model Coppecosenza_ Decision on the Location of an Incoming Internet Provider in the Lagos Region - Rj. 2016.

PMBOK®. PMBOK® Guide - The standard for project management and a guide to the project management body of knowledge. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition and The Standard for Project Management (ENGLISH) (p. i). Project Management Institute. . 14 Campus Boulevard Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073-3299 USA: Project Management Institute, Inc. Seventh Edition 2021.

PMI Project Management Institute, The Standard for Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects: PMI Newtown Square, PA, USA 2019.

QAZI, A. et al. Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modeling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 7, p. 1183-1198, 2016. ISSN 02637863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.008

QUELCH, J.; CAMERON, IT Uncertainty representation and propagation in quantified risk assessment using fuzzy sets. J. Loss Prev. Process. Indian 7 (6), p. 463–473, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4230(94)80004-9

SABZEPARVAR, M. Project Control. v. 13, 24, p. 100, 2018.

SANGAIAH, AK et al. Towards an efficient risk assessment in software projects–Fuzzy reinforcement paradigm. Elsevier, p. 1–14, 24 July 2017 2017.

SIZILIO, GRMA Fuzzy Method to Support Breast Cancer Diagnosis in an Intelligent Collaborative Telediagnostic Environment to Support Decision Making. 2012.

TESFAMARIAM, S.; SAATCIOGLU, M. Risk-Based Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Earthquake Spectra, v. 24, no. 3, p. 795-821, 2019. ISSN 8755-29301944-8201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2952767

TSIGA, Z.; EMES, M. Decision making in Engineering Projects. Elsevier, p. 927–937, 09 December 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.094

WU, D. et al. The multiobjective optimization method considering process risk correlation for project risk response planning. Elsevier, p. 282–295, 7 July 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.013