Online Learning – Learning Styles in a Virtual World Addressing student learning styles in a virtual class focusing on the ability to enhance the learning experience for students in the online learning environment

Margaret Kilcoyne; William Phil Habig

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss12.63

Authors

Margaret Kilcoyne

Northwestern State University, USA
William Phil Habig

Northwestern State University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss12.63

Abstract

Distance learning is growing at an increasing rate, and instructors of online courses need to be aware of the significance of online courses in the overall learning environment and how the growth of online programs provides increasing educational access to all learners. Online course providers face major challenges in determining the most effective method for constructing and delivering their online course materials. These challenges can be difficult to overcome and can lead to course variation and inconsistency that may have a negative effect on the overall learning experience for the distance learner. Exploring and understanding different methodologies for effectively constructing an online course can help lead to creating a successful learning experience for learners.
This paper provides a model for structuring the course materials so that students’ learning styles are met. Examples of materials, assignments, projects, and course delivery modes are provided.

Author Biographies

Margaret Kilcoyne, Northwestern State University, USA

Louisiana College of Business and Technology
William Phil Habig, Northwestern State University, USA

Instructor, Business Administration, College of Business and Technology,

References

Aragon, S. R., Johnson, S. D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The Influence of Learning Style Preferences on Student Success in Online Versus Face-to-Face Environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 227-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1604_3

Barbe, W. B., Swassing, R. H. & Milone, M. N. (1979). Teaching through modality strengths: concepts and practices. Columbus, Ohio: Zaner-Bloser. ISBN 0883091003. OCLC 5990906

Bonk C., & Zhang, K. (August, 2006). Introducing the R2D2 Model: Online Learning for the Diverse Learners of this World. Distance Education, 27(2), pp. 249-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600789670

Businessballs. (2016). Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences. Retrieved from http://www.businessballs.com/howardgardnermultipleintelligences.htm#vak visual auditory kinesthetic learning styles inventory theory model

Carr, S. (2000). As Distance Education Comes of Age, the Challenge is Keeping the Students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 02/11/2000, p.A39.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin.

Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. Learning and Skills Research Centre.

Felder, R. M. & Brent, R. (2005, January). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x

Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning Styles Again: VARKing Up the Right Tree! Educational Developments, SEDA Ltd, Issue 7.4, 4-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-0846(06)70627-8

Fleming, N. & Mills, C. (1992). Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improve the Academy, Vol. 11, 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x

Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the Course: A Study in Online Student Satisfaction and Retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume IX, Number IV, Winter 2006.

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological Types. Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 6. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-097704.

Kihlstrom, J. F. (2011, March 8). How students learn—and how we can help them. [Presentation to the Working Group on How Students Learn]. University of California, Berleley. Retrieved from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/GSI_2011.htm

Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013, April 23). Teaching and technology. [Invited Presentation to the Academic Senate]. University of California, Berleley. Retrieved from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/TeachingTechnology_2013.html

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning, Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lynch, M. (2001). Effective Student Preparation for Online Learning. The Technology Source, November/December 2001.

Manning, G., Ahearne M. & Reece, B (2015). Selling Today, Partnering to Create Value. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson EducationMarsh, K. (2013). Marketing Flexibility (Website), www.learnersbubble.com. Retrieved from http://www.marketingflexibility.com.

McVay, M. (2000). How to be a successful distance Student: Learning on the Internet. (2nd ed.). ValoreBooks.com, Needham Heights, MA: Pearson.

O’Brien, B. & Renner, A. (2002). Online Student Retention: Can it be Done? 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver Co.

O’Connor, D. (2007). Websites that Appeal to the Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, & Kinesthetic Learning Styles. Retrieved from http://www.wiredinstructor.net/geo/course2.html.

Poole, D. M. (2000). Student Participation in a Discussion-Oriented Online Course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33:2, 162-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307

Smith, G. G., Ferguson, D., & Caris, M. (2001). Teaching College Courses Online vs Face-to-Face. THE Journal, Transforming Education Through Technology.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 16-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584152