Estimating, Budgeting for Quality Control in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss1.951Keywords:
Teaching Profession, Pedagogical Formation, AttitudeAbstract
The current study aims to determine the attitudes of estimate and budget of quality control for higher education for the universities and affiliated its institutions. Who is presently undergoing quality assessment according to the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA), it is the organization responsible for verifying quality documents which are prepared by the respective universities and its affiliated colleges and institutions to meet its goals. So in this article suggest the most suitable techniques to estimate and budget for the quality control. To determine most suitable estimate method, this paper analyzes various methods and selects a suitable method of the cost estimate. According to results, the attitudes of the cost estimate depends on the quality work break structure and its various levels of work done to achieve intended goals. The case research examined in this paper was carried out by the authors of the research project ‘Factors Affecting the Quality control in higher education: an Empirical Investigation around Saudi Arabian Universities.
Downloads
References
Carpenter, B., Ashdown, R., & Bovair, K. (Eds.). (2017). Enabling access: Effective teaching and learning for pupils with learning difficulties. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099484
Davis, H. C., Dickens, K., Leon Urrutia, M., Vera, S., del Mar, M., & White, S. (2014). MOOCs for Universities and Learners an analysis of motivating factors.
Delamonica, E., Mehrotra, S., & Vandemoortele, J. (2001). Education for all is affordable: a minimum global cost estimate. New York: UNICEF.
Deininger, K. (2003). Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Economics of Education review, 22(3), 291-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00053-5
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., Brewer, P. C., & McGowan, A. (2010). Managerial accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 792-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.792
Haugan, G. T. (2002). Effective work breakdown structures. Management Concepts Inc.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education (Vol. 46). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Margavio, G. W., Fink, R. L., & Margavio, T. M. (1994). Quality improvement using capital budgeting and Taguchi’s function. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(6), 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719410064612
Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 4(2), 12-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889610116012
Winn, B. A., & Cameron, K. S. (1998). Organizational quality: An examination of the Malcolm Baldrige national quality framework. Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 491-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018745505108
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Safar Bakheet Almudara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
