Community-based Projects in Kenya
Analytical review of Application of Stakeholder Analysis as a Project Design Tool for Enhancing Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss10.1172Keywords:
Stakeholder Analysis, Project Design Tools, Performance of Community-based ProjectsAbstract
The purpose of this study was to establish how the application of stakeholder analysis influences the performance of community-based projects in Kenya. The study employed descriptive research design. The study sought information from a sample of 128 people in a target population of 192 participants chosen through stratified random sampling procedure among the different community-based organizations. Data was collected by using a questionnaire and an interview guide. Qualitative data was analysed through checking data, developing codes, identifying themes and patterns. The analysed data was summarized quantitatively and qualitatively where both descriptive and inferential statistics wwere generated and linked to hypotheses and objectives. Descriptive results were presented as frequency tables, percentages, arithmetic means and standard deviation. Inferential statistics were analysed using Pearson’s Product Moment correlation (r) from simple regression and multiple regression analysis. F-test was used to test the hypotheses. Tests of statistical assumptions were carried out before analysis. In this study; r=0.332, R2=0.110, F 4.095 at p=0.004<0.05; therefore, H0 was rejected and it was concluded that application of stakeholder analysis has a statistically significant influence on the performance of community-based projects. In conclusion, this study has revealed that the application of stakeholder analysis has an influence on the performance of community-based projects. Since community stakeholders are important in the success of community-based projects, there is need to ensure that among the team members of the projects there are community members.
Downloads
References
Blood, A. (2013). Stakeholders Engagement: Reclaiming the Balance when Economics Dominate, IAIAConference Proceeding of ‟Impact Assessment: The Next Generation”. 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment 13 –16th May, Calgary Stampede BMO Centre Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Botchway, K. (2001). Paradox of Empowerment: Reflections on a Case Study from Northern Ghana. World Development 29, 135-153. Dongier, P., Van Domelen, J., Ostrom, E., Ryan, A., Wakeman, W & Bebbington, A. (2003). Community driven development. World Bank Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper.Kalsaas, B. T. (2012). The last planner system style of planning: its basis in learning theory. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2(2), 88-100. Kelly, K. & Van Vlaenderen, H. (1995). Evaluating participation processes in community development. Evaluation and Program Planning 18 (8), 371-3 Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. Kolavalli, S. & Kerr, J. (2002). Scaling up participatory watershed development in India. Development & Change Journal 33 (12), 213-235. Kumar, S. (2002). Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners. Vistar Publications, New Delhi India. Long, N.D., Ogunlana, S., Quang, T., & Lam, K. C. (2004). Large construction projects in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. International Journal of Project Management, 22,(8),553–56. Loosemore, M. (2000). Crisis Management in Construction Projects, Virginia: ASCE Press. Mkutu, A. (2011). The role of community based organizations in the development of rural a case study of community based organizations in Kiogoro division, Kisii county. St. Paul's University, Kenya. Paul, M. (2005). Principles of project monitoring and evaluation www.plantsscience. Pauline Publications Africa Daughters of St Paul 00100 Nairobi G.P.O Kenya. www.plantsscience. Ucdavis-edu/-…/publical. Price, S. & Mylius, B. (1991). Social Analysis and Community Participation. Promoting Practical Sustainability (2000). Quality Assurance Group. The Australian Government‗s Overseas Aid Program. Canberra. SAD. (2008). Performance of Projects of Standard Design Models. Supervision Administrative, Annual Performance Review, 3, 2-189.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Wasike Wilberforce Walubengo, Dorothy Ndunge Kyalo, Angeline Sabina Mulwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
