Writing the Argumentative Literary Review in EFL/ESL Contexts
A Critical Analysis Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss1.1309Keywords:
literature review, EFL/ESL, academic writing, LebanonAbstract
Research studies have indicated that English as a Foreign/Second Language students attending English medium universities have problems in writing the literature review, an important requirement in their term and/or research papers. It has been noted that the main challenges these students face are often little or no knowledge of the task, organization and critical analysis needed. Effective literature reviews based on the western model have shown to include evaluation, clarification, integration, synthesis and organization of the controversies in past and current research on the topic being studied and identification of the gaps in the field and the question(s)/solution(s) which the researcher is attempting to address. Although much has been written on how to write literature reviews in various disciplines, there is little or none with L1 Arabic students in the Lebanese context. This paper outlines some teaching/learning guidelines of the task based on one organizational structure, the argumentative, and a critical analysis perspective to help develop these students’ skills in writing the literature review.
Downloads
References
Bacha, N.N. (2010). Teaching the academic argument in an EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes (9)3, 229-241. Elsevier Publishers.
Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London, Sage Publication Ltd.
Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: from the Internet to paper. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Feez, S. (1998).Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: McQuarie University/AME
13
Galvin, J. (2006). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences .( 3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard
(Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191-218). London: Routledge.
Hyland, K. & Shaw, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of English for academic purposes. London: Routledge.
Johns, A.M. (Ed.). (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2012). The literature review: Six steps to success. California: Sage Publications.
Lopez, M. C. (2014). Survey of Research Methods: Literature Review. Michigan State University: Online article.
Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62-89.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Moodie, J. (2001). The Development of critical voice in the writing of international postgraduate students Changing Identities. Paper presented at the National Language and Academic Skills Conference, Wollongong, Australia.
Mongan-Rallis, H. (2014). Guidelines for writing a literature review. http://www.duluth.umn.edu/~hrallis/guides/researching/litreview.html Retrieved December 13, 2018
Mukattash, L. (2003). Towards a new methodology for teaching English to Arab Learners. TAFL, 4, 211-234.
Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Schmaltz, R. M., Jansen, E. & Wenckowski, N. (2017). Redefining critical thinking: Teaching students to think like scientists, Frontiers in Psychology, 8(459). 1-4.
14
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014). Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction in Higher
Education: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies, Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 1-17.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Nahla Nola Bacha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
