A  Systematic Literature Review for Multimedia Learning Objects Applied to Stewart Platforms Using Software Engineering Methods

Maicon Herverton Lino Ferreira da Silva; Augusto José da Silva Rodrigues; Elton César dos Santos Silva

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss1.1063

Authors

Maicon Herverton Lino Ferreira da Silva

UniGrendal - Educational Holding Group, USA
Augusto José da Silva Rodrigues

UniGrendal - Educational Holding Group, USA
Elton César dos Santos Silva

UniGrendal - Educational Holding Group, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss1.1063

Keywords:

medical informatics, orthopedics system, medical learning objects

Abstract

This article describes a systematic literature review (SLR), a methodology to be used in the survey of articles, monographs, dissertations and theses, in scientific databases, to provide a reference bibliography for the construction of multimedia learning objects applied to Stewart platforms, using Software Engineering methods. The bases existent in the literature between the years of 2009 and 2012 were analyzed. The methodology used was based on the adaptation of a revision protocol that suggests for a good SLR, to follow some steps, being: planning, primary reading, formulation of questions for checking if the work fits the subject and classification. The use of SLR assisted in the bibliographic survey process bringing successful results and relevant publications with high impact factors, thus making a solid basis for several works in the research fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] D. Tapscott, A. D. Willians. Wikinomics: como a colaboração em massa pode mudar seu negócio. São Paulo: Nova Fronteira, 2006.
[2] R. E. S. Santos. Técnicas de processamento de linguagem natural aplicadas ao processo de mineração de textos: uma revisão sistemática, UFRPE/UAST – Monografia. 2012.
[3] A. P. Machado, R. Ferreira, I. I. Bittencourt, E. Elias, P. Brito, E. Costa. Mineração de Texto em Redes sociais virtuais Aplicada à Educação a Distância. Revista Digital da CVA - Ricesu, ISSN 1519-8529, v. 6, n. 23, julho de 2010.
[4] S. P. Shashank, P. Chakka, D. V. Kumas. A Systematic Literature Survey of Integration Testing in Component-Based Software Engineering. Int'l Conf. on Computer & Communication Technology. ICCCT'10. IEEE. 2010.
[5] V. Rocio. Tecnologias da comunicação e informação. Repositório Aberto, Universidade Aberta. Lisboa: Ed. Autor, 2010. 32 p. Available in: <http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/1586>. Access in: 20 Jan 2017.
[6] J. Werthein. A sociedade da informação e seus desafios. Ci. Inf., Brasília, v. 29, n. 2, Aug. 2000. Available in: <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-19652000000200009&lng=en&nrm=iso>. Access in: 05 Jan 2017.
[7] E. Dumbill. What is big data? An introduction to the big data landscape. O'reilly radar. May. 2012. Available in: <http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/01/what-is-big-data.html>. Access in: 01 Mar 2017.
[8] I. C. A. S. Frade. Métodos de Alfabetização, métodos de ensino e conteúdos da alfabetização: perspectivas históricas e desafios atuais. Educação, Santa Maria, V. 32 - n 01. p. 21-40, 2007.
[9] D. K. Lee, E. T. A. Duong, D. G. Chang. The Ilizarov Method of External Fixation: Current Intraoperative Concepts. AORN Journal. Vol. 91, nº 3. Mar 2010.
[10] A. Jesus, M. J. Gomes, A. Cruz. Objetos de Aprendizagtem - Uma Proposta de Design Pedagógico. II Congresso Internacional TIC e Educação. Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa, 2012.
[11] J. Biolchini, P. G. Mian, A. C. C. Natali, G. H. Travassos. Systematic Review in Software Engineering. Relatório Técnico (Programa de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação) Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ – Rio de Janeiro, 2005.
[12] T. Cochrane. Developing interactive multimedia Learning Objects using QuickTime Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.23(6), pp.2596-2640. ISSN: 0747-5632 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.007, SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals. 2007.
[13] S. Nangia. MERLOT in the classroom: enhancing foreign language instruction through online learning objects. Michigan Academician, Spring, Vol.40(1), p.105(1), ISSN: 0026-2005, Cengage Learning, Inc. 2010.
[14] A. Baki, Ü. Çakirogly. - Learning objects in high school mathematics classrooms: Implementation and evaluation. Computers & Education, Vol.55(4), pp.1459-1469. ISSN: 0360-1315 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.009. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals, 2010.
[15] M. Barak, S. Ziv. Wandering: A Web-based platform for the creation of location-based interactive learning objects. Computers & Education, Vol.62, pp.159-170. ISSN: 0360-1315 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.015. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals, 2013.
[16] T. Cochrane. Interactive QuickTime: developing and evaluating multimedia learning objects to enhance both face-to-face and distance e-learning environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge, and Learning Objects, Annual, Vol.1, p.33(22). Cengage Learning, Inc. 2005.
[17] M. Haughey, B. Muirhead. The Pedagogical and Multimedia Designs of Learning Objects for Schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.21(4), p.470-490. ISSN: 1449-5554. ERIC (U.S. Dept. of Education), 2005.
[18] J. Najjar, E. Duval. Actual Use of Learning Objects and Metadata An Empirical Analysis. Computer Science Department, K.U.Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium, IEEE, 2003.
[19] N. Y. Yen, T. K. Shih, R. L. Chao, Q, Jin. Ranking Metrics and Search Guidance for Learning Object Repository, vol. 3 no. 3. pp. 250-264. DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.15, IEEE, July-September 2010.
[20] J. M. C. Silva, R. M. Vicari. Evaluating a Brazilian Metadata to Learning Objects to Web, Mobile and Digital Television Platforms. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Postal Code 15064, Porto Alegre/RS, 91501-970, Brazil, IEEE. 2010.
[21] R. Santiago, L. A. André. Architecture for Learning Objects Sharing among Learning Institutions—LOP2P . vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 91-95 - UNIVALI—Unversidade do Vale Do Itaja ’ı. DOI Bookmark: Available in: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.9. April-June 2010. Access in: 02. Mar. 2018.
[22] C. Cechinel, S. Sánchez-alonso, E. García-barriconal. Statistical profiles of highly-rated learning objectsutor. Computers & Education, Vol.57(1), pp.1255-1269. ISSN: 0360-1315 ; DOI: 0.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.012. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals. 2011.
[23] G. Olimpo, R. M. Bottino, J. Earp, M. Ott, F. Pozzi, M. Tavella. Pedagogical plans as communication oriented objects. Computers & Education, Vol.55(2), pp.476-488. ISSN: 0360-1315 ; DOI: 0.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.011. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals. 2010.
[24] Z. Pizlo, T. Sawada, Y. Li, W. G. Kropatsch, R. M. Steinman – New approach to the perception of 3D shape based on veridicality, complexity, symmetry and volume. ISSN: 0042-6989 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.024. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals. 2009.
[25] R. J. Windle, H. Wharrad, D. Mccormick, H. Laverty, M. Taylor. Sharing and Reuse in OER: Experiences Gained from Open Reusable Learning Objects in Health. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, ISSN: 1365-893X. ERIC (U.S. Dept. of Education). 2010.
[26] R. J. Windle, H. Wharrad, D. Mccormick, K. Dandrea, H. Wharrad. The Characteristics of Reusable Learning Objects That Enhance Learning: A Case-Study in Health-Science Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.42(5), p.811-823. ISSN: 0007-1013 ; DOI: 10.1111/j.1467 10.01108.x. ERIC (U.S. Dept. of Education). 2011.
[27] P. E. Battistella, A. Wangenheim, C. G. Wangenheim. Evaluation of Free Authoring Tools for Producing SCORM-Conform Learning Objects. Vol5. No 4. ITEE/IEEE. 2010.
[28] A. Kybartaite, J. Nousiainen, J. Malmivuo. Learning Objects for the Virtual Campus of Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Multidisciplinary Engineering Education Magazine (MEEM), - submitted, 2010.
[29] J. Yao, Y. Hou, H. Wang, T. Zhou, Y. Zhao. Spatially isotropic configuration of Stewart platform-based force sensor. Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol.46(2), pp.142-155. ISSN: 0094-114X ; DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.10.002. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal. 2011.
[30] S. Pedrammehr, M. Mahboubkhah, N. Khani. Improved dynamic equations for the generally configured Stewart platform manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol.26(3), pp.711-721. ISSN: 1738-494X ; E-ISSN: 1976-3824 ; DOI: 10.1007/s12206-011-1231-0. Springer Science & Business Media B.V. 2012.
[31] Z. Jia, S. Lin, W. Liu. Measurement method of six-axis load sharing based on the Stewart platform. Measurement, Vol.43(3), pp.329-335. ISSN: 0263-2241 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2009.11.005. SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals. 2010.
[32] A. Torri, M. Banno, A. Ueda, K. Doki. A small-size self-propelled Stewart platform. Electrical Engineering in Japan, Vol.181, pp.37-46. Identificador: ISSN: 0424-7760; E-ISSN: 1520-6416 ; DOI: 10.1002/eej.21261. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2012.
[33] D. S. Negash, R. Mitra. Integral sliding mode controller for trajectory tracking control of Stewart platform manipulator Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS), International Conference on Topic(s): Communication, Networking & Broadcasting; Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/ICIINFS.2010.5578628, Page(s): 650. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2010.
[34] R. S. Stoughton, T. Arai. A modified stewart platform manipulator with improved dexterity. robotics and automation, IEEE transactions. DOI: 10.1109/70.238280, page(s): 166. IEEE JOURNALS & MAGAZINES. 1993.
[35] J. H. Wasilewski, H. S. Kawakami, C. Edward. Stewart: Cultural dynamics pioneer. international journal of intercultural relations ISSN: 0147-1767 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.08.012. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2012.
[36] K. Klumper, A. Morbi, K. J. Chisholm, R. Beranek, M. Ahmadi, R. Langlois. Orientation control of atlas: A novel motion simulation platform. mechatronics, vol.22(8), pp.1112-1123. ISSN: 0957-4158; DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.09.008. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2012.
[37] J. Lin, C. Chen. Computer-aided-symbolic dynamic modeling for stewart-platform manipulator. robotica, vol.27(3), pp.331-341. ISSN: 0263-5747 ; E-ISSN: 1469-8668 ; DOI: 10.1017/S0263574708004736. Cambridge university press. 2009.
[38] L. Fraguela, L. Fridman, V. V. Alexandrov. Output integral sliding mode control to stabilize position of a Stewart platform. journal of the franklin institute, vol.349(4), pp.1526-1542. ISSN: 0016-0032; DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.04.002. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2012.
[39] Q. Meng, T. Zhang, J. He. J. Song, X. Chen. Improved model-based control of a six-degree-of-freedom stewart platform driven by permanent magnet synchronous motors. industrial robot: An international journal, vol.39(1), p.47-56. emerald group publishing limited. ISSN: 0143-991X; DOI: 10.1108/01439911211192493. emerald management eJournals. 2012.
[40] V. E. Omurlu, U. Buyuksahin, I. Yildiz, A. Unsal, A. Sagirli, S. N. Engin, I. B. Kucukdemiral. A stewart platform as a FBW flight control unit for space vehicles. recent advances in space technologies. RAST ’09. DOI: 10.1109/RAST.2009.5158285, page(s): 716. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2009.
[41] S. Ay, O. E. Vatandas, A. Hacioglu. The effect of radius of joint location on workspace analysis of the 6-6 Stewart platform mechanism. recent advances in space technologies. RAST ’09. DOI: 10.1109/RAST.2009.5158287, page(s): 728. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2009.
[42] I. Chung, H. Chang, C. Lin. Fuzzy control of a six-degree motion platform with stability analysis. systems, man, and cybernetics. IEEE SMC ’99 conference proceedings. DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.1999.814111, page(s): 325, 1999.
[43] R. J. Saltaren, L. J. Puglisi, C. G. Cena, I. P. Regueiro, R. Aracil. Design of a hydraulic 6UPS mechanism for experimental research. universidad tecnológica de panamá, panamá and niversidade politecnica de madrid, madrid, spain. CONPACAN XXXI, nov. 2011.
[44] C. Chen, T. Liao. A hybrid strategy for the time- and energy-efficient trajectory planning of parallel platform manipulators robotics and computer integrated manufacturing, vol.27(1), pp.72-81. ISSN: 0736-5845; DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2010.06.012. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2011.
[45] B. Dasgupta, T. S. Mruthyunjaya. Singularity-free path planning for the stewart platform manipulator. mechanism and machine theory, vol.33(6), pp.711-725. ISSN: 0094-114X ; DOI: 10.1016/S0094-114X(97)00095-5. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 1998.
[46] I. Davliakos, E. Papadopoulos. Model-based control of a 6-dof electrohydraulic Stewart–Gough platform. mechanism and machine theory, vol.43(11), pp.1385-1400; ISSN: 0094-114X; DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.12.002. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2007.
[47] Z. Geng, L. S. Haynes, J. D. Lee, R. L. Carroll. On the dynamic model and kinematic analysis of a class of Stewart platforms. robotics and autonomous systems, vol.9(4), pp.237-254. ISSN: 0921-8890; DOI: 10.1016/0921-8890(92)90041-V.SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 1992.
[48] M. Choi, W. Kim, B. Yi. Trajectory planning in 6-degrees-of-freedom operational space for the 3-degrees-of-freedom mechanism configured by constraining the Stewart platform structure. control, automation and systems. ICCAS ’07. DOI: 10.1109/ICCAS.2007.4406521. page(s): 1222. 2007.
[49] S. Ay, O. E. Vatandas, A. Hacioglu. The effect of radius of joint location on workspace analysis of the 6-6 Stewart platform mechanism. recent advances in space technologies. RAST ’09. DOI: 10.1109/RAST.2009.5158287, page(s): 728. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2009.
[50] A. A. Herdon, M. Cramer, K. Sprong. Analysis of advanced flight management systems (FMS), flight management computer (FMC) field observations trials, Radius-to-Fix path terminators. digital avionics systems conference. DASC 2008. IEEE/AIAA 27th. DOI: 10.1109/DASC.2008.4702775 page(s): 2.A.5-1. 2008.
[51] D. K. Wukich, R. J. Belczyk. An introduction to the taylor spatial frame for foot and ankle applications. operative techniques in orthopaedics, 2006, vol.16(1), pp.2-9. ISSN: 1048-6666; DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2006.02.001. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2006.
[52] A. P. Molloy, A. Roche, B. Narayan. Treatment of nonunion and malunion of trauma of the foot and ankle using external fixation. foot and ankle clinics of north america, vol.14(3), pp.563-587. ISSN: 1083-7515; DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2009.03.007. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2009.
[53] G. Brandt, G. Rau, K. Radermacher, S. Lavallee, S. Erbse, H. Staudte. Engineering in medicine and biology society. bridging disciplines for biomedicine. proceedings of the 18th annual international conference of the IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656932. page(s): 236. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 1996.
[54] R. Ye,Y. Chen. Development of a six degree of freedom (DOF) hybrid robot for femur shaft fracture reduction. robotics and biomimetics. ROBIO. DOI: 10.1109/ROBIO.2009.4913021, page(s): 306. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2009.
[55] T. Hainey, T. Connolly, M. Stansfield. E. A. Boyle. Evaluation of a game to teach requirements collection and analysis in software engineering at tertiary education level. computers & education, vol.56(1), pp.21-35. ISSN: 0360-1315; DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.008. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals, 2011.
[56] M. Hannan. Analysis of the collaborative activities in software development processes from the perspective of chronotopes. computers in human behavior, vol.27(1), pp.248-267. ISSN: 0747-5632; DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.003. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2011.
[57] K. Schneider, E. Knauss, S. Houmb, S. Islam, J. Jüjens. Enhancing security requirements engineering by organizational learning. requirements engineering, vol.17(1), pp.35-56. ISSN: 0947-3602 ; E-ISSN: 1432-010X; DOI: 10.1007/s00766-011-0141-0. springer science & business media B.V. 2012.
[58] M. Ramachandran. Guidelines based software engineering for developing software components. journal of software engineering and applications (JSEA), vol.5(1), p.1(6). ISSN: 1945-3116. cengage learning, inc. jan, 2012.
[59] J. Portillo-rodíguez, A. Vizcaíno, M. Piattini, S. Beecham. Tools used in global software engineering: A systematic mapping review. information and software technology, vol.54(7), pp.663-685. ISSN: 0950-5849 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.02.006. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2012.
[60] S. Ghai, J. Kaur. Analysis of user requirements gathering practices in agile and Non-Agile software development team. international journal of computer applications, vol.58(8), p.13. ISSN: 09758887. directory of open access journals (DOAJ). 2012.
[61] I. Richardson, V. Casey, F. Mccaffery. J. Burton, S. Beecham. A process framework for global software engineering teams. information and software technology, vol.54(11), pp.1175-1191. ISSN: 0950-5849; DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.05.002. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2012.
[62] A. Tahir, R. Ahmad. Requirement engineering practices - an empirical study. computational intelligence and software engineering (CiSE). DOI: 10.1109/CISE.2010.5676827. page(s): 1. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2010.
[63] M. Hannan. Analysis of the collaborative activities in software development processes from the perspective of chronotopes. computers in human behavior, vol.27(1), pp.248-267. ISSN: 0747-5632 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.003. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2011.
[64] G. Stephanopoulos, G. V. Reklaitis. Process systems engineering: From solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology: A history of development, successes and prospects for the future. chemical engineering science, vol.66(19), pp.4272-4306. ISSN: 0009-2509; DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.049. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2011.
[65] I. Richardson, V. Casey, F. Mccaffery, J. Burton. S. Beecham. A process framework for global software engineering teams. information and software technology, vol.54(11), pp.1175-1191 - ISSN: 0950-5849; DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.05.002. SciVerse ScienceDirect journals. 2012.
[66] J. S. Collofello, M. Hart. Monitoring team progress in a software engineering project class. frontiers in education conference, 1999. FIE ’99. 29th annual. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.1999.839226. page(s): 11B4/7. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 1999.
[67] Z. Quangui, W. Pu, Y. Jianzhuo, F. Liying, Q. Yongsheng. Research on Human-Computer interaction in 3D configuration software. research challenges in computer science. ICRCCS ’09.DOI: 10.1109/ICRCCS.2009.14, page(s): 18. IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS. 2009.
[68] M. H. L. F. Silva, et al. Stewart platforms: Contributions to the learning process in problems of orthopedics. CISTI'15. DOI: 10.1109/CISTI.2015.7170533. July 2015.