Comparative Analysis Between Native and Hybrid Mobile Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss11.1864
Abstract views: 450
/ 
PDF downloads: 186
Keywords:
Application, Mobile, TechnologyAbstract
With the growth of technology in the mobile area, the app market has been bringing solutions to many problems and making life easier for many people, whether in the business, technology, administrative and many others. It is necessary to understand that to build an app, there are many technologies for different purposes, and developers need to know which one is best applied in every situation. Therefore, the objective of this research is to bring an analysis about the native and hybrid development, showing its main features and information regarding the usability and functionality of two existing applications, which were built within the standards of each tool, based on two features of ISO / IEC 25010: 2011 regarding Software Product Quality. An exploratory research was conducted to bring comparative data regarding applications, and based on the results obtained, it was observed that it is possible to develop similar applications in interface, quality and functionality, even if they are built with different technologies. As a result, native technology is often used to build more robust functionality-based applications that follow the interface standard of each platform, and hybrids are a lower-cost alternative, as well as fact that its source code is fully reusable for use on other platforms.
Downloads
References
[2] RODRIGUES, M. Infográfico: qual a real importância dos aplicativos? Coworkers, 2015. Disponível em: https://coworkers.com.br/infografico-qual-a-real-importancia-dos-aplicativos/. Acesso em: 3 de setembro de 2019.
[3] VIEGAS, JÚLIO. 60% dos usuários de aplicativos mobile definem a performance como crítica! OneDayTesting, 2016. Disponível em: <https://blog.onedaytesting.com.br/usuarios-mobile-definem-a-performance-como-critica/>. Acesso em: 05 de setembro de 2019.
[4] Top 4 de linguagens de programação para desenvolvimento mobile. TotalCross, 2016. Disponível em: <https://blog.totalcross.com/pt/top-4-de-linguagens-de-programacao-para-desenvolvimento-mobile/>. Acesso em: 07 de setembro de 2019.
[5] SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: 24. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2018.
[6] Lista da melhor pilha de tecnologia para desenvolvimento de aplicativos móveis. Appypie, 2018. Disponível em: <https://pt.appypie.com/lista-da-melhor-pilha-de-tecnologia-para-desenvolvimento-de-aplicativos-moveis>. Acesso em: 10 de setembro de 2019.
[7] LOZOVEI, JULIO. Aplicativos híbridos – vilões ou mocinhos? Medium, 2018. Disponível em: <https://medium.com/trainingcenter/aplicativos-h%C3%ADbridos-vil%C3%B5es-ou-mocinhos-b22276f523c0>. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2019.
[8] S.J., FÁBIO ROGÉRIO. Híbrido vs Nativo: Uma visão do time do Ionic. Fábio Rogério SJ, 2018. Disponível em: < https://fabiorogeriosj.com.br/2018/02/20/Hibrido-vs-Nativo-Uma-visao-do-time-do-Ionic/>. Acesso em: 10 de setembro de 2019.
[9]ISO 25000 Software Product Quality. ISO 25000, 2019. Disponível em: <https://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25010>. Acesso em: 11 de setembro de 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 João Vitor Barros Assunção, Renan Phelipe Rodrigues Pantoja, Bruno Pereira Gonçalves, David Barbosa de Alencar, Jean Mark Lobo de Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
