Technological Management of Public Services Based on the  DMAIC Method Applying Theory U

Bianca Moret Neubauer; Flávio  de São Pedro Filho; Leonardo  Severo da Luz Neto; Fabio Biasotto Feitosa; Luciano Alves Bezerra

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss12.2073

Authors

Bianca Moret Neubauer Federal University of Rondonia
Flávio de São Pedro Filho Federal University of Rondonia
Leonardo Severo da Luz Neto Federal University of Rondonia
Fabio Biasotto Feitosa a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:30:"Federal University of Rondonia";}
Luciano Alves Bezerra Federal University of Rondonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss12.2073

Keywords:

Technology Management, Innovation, DMAIC method, Theory U.

Abstract

This study uses a qualitative case study based on technology management in public services, drawing on the background of a personnel management department. The analysis was based on the concept of the DMAIC method. This approach was chosen due to the obvious need for innovative practices to achieve improved results. The study sought to answer the following question: how can technology management impact on the sector's efficiency study? To answer the question, this study’s main objective is to study the technological production management focused on public service units; and specific objectives characterize the technology management strategy of the search sector (1), make a SWOT analysis of the practices and procedures adopted in the sector under study (2) and suggest managerial innovation considering the DMAIC method, and applying Theory U (3). As a result, it was possible to recognize that the technology management strategy focuses on the organizational and internal variables with critical enabling innovative proposals in the production process. This study is of interest to public officials committed to performance excellence in administrative units under their responsibility. This is another contribution to students, researchers and others involved with the management area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDRADE, Italo Welke of; Azevedo, William Alexander. (2018). Panorama of information analysis for competitive intelligence. Competitive Intelligence Magazine, São Paulo, v. 8, no. 1, p. 23-43, Jan / Mar 2018. ISSN: 2236-210X. Available in: http://www.inteligenciacompetitivarev.com.br/ojs/index.php/rev/article/view/245/pdf_131. Accessed on 03 December2018.
BIRTH, Natalia Araujo Tracey et al. (2015). Quality Parameters: A deconstruction method routines. In: IX Brasilian VIRTUAL CONFERENCE. Convibra Administration.: Convibra, 2015. p.1 - 16. Available at: http://www.convibra.com.br/dp/default.asp?pid=11981&ev=87. Access: 23 Sep2017.
BRAZIL. Federal Constitution (1988). Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil, Brasília, DF. Available in: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicaocompilado.htm. Accessed on December 1. 2018.
BUGARÍN, Mauricio; MENEGUIN, Fernando B. Incentives for corruption and inaction in the public service: A mechanism design analysis. Honor student. Econ., São Paulo, v.46, no.1, p.43-89, sea.2016. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-41612016000100043&lng=en&nrm=iso. Accessed on: 09 Apri2019.
CHIAVENATO, Idalberto. (2014). Introduction to the Theory of General Administration. São Paulo: Manole.
COOPER, Donald A.; SCHINDLER, Pamela S. (2016). Research Methods in Management. 12. ed. Porto Alegre: Amgh. Translation: Language Scientific Ltd., texts 10. Publisher Iuri Duquia Abreu.
MAXIMIANO, Cesar Antonio Amaru. (2015). Introduction to general theory of administration. São Paulo: Atlas.
MINTZBERG Henry et al. (2010). Safari's strategy: a road map through the jungle of strategic planning. Porto Alegre: Bookman. Translation: Lene Belon Ribeiro; Technical Review: Carlos Alberto Vargas Rossi.
SAUNDERS, Mark; LEWIS, Philip; THORNHILL, Adrian. (2012). Research Methods for business students. England: Pearson.
SCHARMER, C. Otto. (2010). Theory U: how to lead by perception and realization of the emerging future. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
SCHARMER, C. Otto. (2014). Leading from the future that emerges: the evolution of ego-centric economic system for eco-centric. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
SILVA, Talita Caetano; Burger, Fabricio. (2018). Organizational Learning and Innovation: Contributions of Knowledge Management to propel a Corporate Environment Focused on Learning and Innovation. NAVUS - Journal of Management and Technology, vol.8, no.1, p.7-19. ISSN: 2237-4558. Available in: http://navus.sc.senac.br/index.php/navus/article/view/569/pdf. Accessed on 03 Dec2018.
SOUZA, Bruno de Carvalho et al. (2018). Implementation of 5S program via the DMAIC methodology. Brazilian Journal Of Development. Curitiba, v.4, no.5, p.2163-2179. in Oct2018. ISSN: 2525-8761 Available in: http://www.brjd.com.br/index.php/BRJD/article/view/245/204. Accessed on 03Dec2018.