Maintaining Quality in Online Learning Environments: Issues and Challenges

Melissa Aldredge; Sarah DuBois; Diane  Mobley; Elizabeth   Prejean; Margaret  Vienne

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss12.2077

Authors

Dr. Melissa Aldredge, CPA

Northwestern State University
Mrs. Lise DuBois, M.S.

Northwestern State University
Mrs. Diane Mobley, CPA

Northwestern State University
Elizabeth Abington Prejean, DBA

Northwestern State University
Mrs. Margaret Vienne, MBA

Northwestern State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss12.2077

Keywords:

Distance Learning, Online Security, E-cheating, Academic Dishonesty, Security Issues

Abstract

The online classroom continues to play an ever increasing role in higher education. There are proven, research-based pedagogical techniques available to instructors who want to create online courses that are both dynamic and engaging. With careful planning, online learning can provide students with a positive learning experience without sacrificing the academic quality of learning. Addressing security issues and challenges is vital to maintaining the desired academic rigor and quality. This paper discusses these important security issues and offers a variety of solutions for facilitating a secure learning environment.

References

Ary, E. & Brune, C. (2011). A comparison of student learning outcome in traditional and online personal finance courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning. 7(4). 465-474. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no4/brune_1211.pdf

Cavanaugh, J. & Jacquemin, S. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning. 19(2) 25- 32. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.nsula.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1062940&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Cultivating Integrity Worldwide. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://academicintegrity.org/about/

Furnell, S. & Karweni, T. (2001). Security issues in online distance learning. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 31. 28-35. doi:10.1108/03055720010803998.

Harwood, K., McDonald, P., Butler, J., Drago, D., & Schlumpf, K. (2018). Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education. BMC Medical Education 18: 240. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7

Horka, T. (2019, August 23). Mississippi State hit with NCAA sanctions: Tutor took exams for football, basketball players. Clarion Ledger. Retrieved from https://www.clarionledger.com/story/sports/2019/08/23/mississippi-state-university-athletics-academic-violations-ncaa-penalties-john-cohen-mark-keenum- msu/2041804001/

Hylton, K., Levy Y.,& Dringus, L. (2016). Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams. Computers & Education. 92 (1). 53-56. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.nsula.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoah&AN=36961537&site=ehost-live&scope=site

James, E. (2019, January 1). Former Missouri tutor completed coursework for 12 student- athletes. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/former-missouri-tutor-completed-coursework-12-student-athletes

Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G. & Woodward (2017). Institutional uses of twitter in US higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 42, 97-111. doi:10.1007/s10755-016-9375-6

Kolowich, S. (2013). Behind the webcam's watchful eye, online proctoring takes hold. Chronicle of Higher Education. 4/19/2013, Vol. 59 Issue 32, A12-A12. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Behind-the-Webcams-Watchful/138505

McKeever, B. W. (2019). Different formats, equal outcomes? Comparing in-person and online education in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Education, 5(2). Retrieved from https://aejmc.us/jpre/2019/08/17/different-formats-equal-outcomes-comparing-in-person-and-online-education-in-public-relations/

ProctorU Raises the Bar for Academic Integrity in Online Proctoring. (2018, September 5). Retrieved from https://www.proctoru.com/industry-news-and-notes/proctoru-raises-bar-academic-integrity-online-proctoring

Respondus (n.d.). Retrieved from https://web.respondus.com/about/

Rowe, N. C. (2004). Cheating in online student assessment: Beyond plagiarism. Online
Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(2), 1-10. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer72/rowe72.html

Weldy, T. (2018). Traditional, blended, or online: Business student preferences and experience with different course formats. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 12(2). 55-62. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Traditional%2c+Blended%2c+or+Online%3a+Business+Student+Preferences+and+Experience+with+Different+Course+Formats&id=EJ1193431