Modifying PPP in Promoting Communicative Language Teaching to Improve the Students’ English Communicative Competence

Rachma Vivien Belinda; Patuan Raja; Flora

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss8.3304

Authors

Rachma Vivien Belinda Lampung University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-7160
Patuan Raja Lampung University
Flora Lampung University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss8.3304

Keywords:

PPP, CLT, communicative competence, accuracy, fluency

Abstract

This study was going to find out the significant difference between students’ English communicative competence after being taught by using original PPP method and the modified PPP by using CLT. Moreover, the more effective method between original PPP method and the modified one in improving the students’ communicative competence was investigated. This is a true experimental research using both control and experimental class comparing the original and modified PPP. The subject was forty junior EFL students whose English were still at the lower level. The result showed that there is a significant difference between students’ English communicative competence after being taught by using original PPP method and the modified one. In addition, both original and modified PPP are good to facilitate the learners in having good grammatical competence; however, only PPP that has been modified by using CLT that can facilitate them in having a good communicative competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rachma Vivien Belinda, Lampung University

The Graduate School, English Education Program
Patuan Raja, Lampung University

Master English Education Program
Flora, Lampung University

Master English Education Program

References

Anderson, J. (2016). Why practice makes perfect sense: The past, present and potential future of the ppp paradigm in language teacher education. ELTED 19, 14-22.

Ellis, R., and Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796580

Ellis, R. (1993). Talking shop: Second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? ELT Journal 47 (1), 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.1.3

Gronlund, N. E., and Waugh C. K. (2009). Assessment of student achievement new edition. Colombus, Ohio: Pearson.

Frans, A. (2020). Learning of speaking model development with PPP (Presentation, Practice and Product) approach implying values of character. International Journal for Innovative Research In Multidisciplinary Field 6 (4), 210-218.

Harmer, J. (2009). How to teach English. Harlow: Longman.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820103200109

Hellstrom, R. (2016). A thesis: Task Based Language Teaching versus Presentation Practice Production. Linkoping, Sweden: Linkoping University.

Jarvis, H. (2015). From PPP and CALL/MALL to a praxis of task-based teaching and mobile assisted language use. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language 19 (1), 1-9.

Kaouter, K., et al. (2014). The effect of Task Based Language Teaching on Learner Autonomy: A case of pre-university students at the International Islamic University Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS) 2 (1), 6-10

Kiely, R. & Askham, J. (2012). Furnished imagination: The impact of preservice teacher training on early career work in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 46 (3), 496-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.39

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly 40 (1): 59–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40264511

Lasmiatun, I., and Munir, S. (2018). Potential future of PPP paradigm on EFL grammar teaching: An annotated survey. 3rd International Conference on Education 2018 Teacher in the Digital Age, pp. 151-158.

Lewis, M. (1996). Implications of a lexical view of language. In Willis, J. & Willis, D. (eds.). Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp. 10-16). Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.

Richards, J. C., (2014). Towards a pedagogy of grammar instruction. RELC Journal 45 (1), pp. 5-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214522622

Saaristo, P. (2015). Grammar is the heart of language: Grammar and its role in language learning among Finnish university students. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, and P. Taalas. Voice of pedagogical development – expanding, enhancing, and exploring higher education language learning, pp. 279-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000296

Sari, A., and Sembiring, R. (2019). Improving students’ speaking skill through the combination of presentation, practice, and production (PPP) method and talking stick method. Liner Journal, 2 (3), 68-76.

Savignon, S. J. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice: Texts and contexts in second language learning. California: McGraw-Hill.

Scrivener, J. (1996). ARC: A descriptive model for classroom work on language. In Willis, J. & Willis, D. (eds.). Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp. 79-92). Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.

Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis and D. Willis, Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900209

Spada, N., and Lightbown, P.M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly 42 (2), 181-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x

Spada, N., and Tomita, Y. (2010). Interaction between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60 (2), 263-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x

Tomlinson, B., and Masuhara, H. (2013). Adult coursebooks. ELT Journal 67 (2), 233-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct007

Weller, D. (2019). What is ‘Presentation, Practice, Production’ (PPP)? https://www.barefootteflteacher.com/blog/what-is-presentation-practice-production-ppp

Willis, J. (1994). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Yusuf, A. (2015). A PPP (Presentation, Practice, And Production) phase method of teaching speaking to university students: Unpublished script. Jombang: Unipdu Jombang.