Governance proposal for an innovation center inserted in a referred ecosystem: The case of Maceió

Danisson Luiz dos Santos Reis; Clarissa Stefani  Teixeira; Alexandre Augusto  Biz; Janaina Galdino de Barros; Tatyana Lima Marinho

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss9.3386

Authors

Danisson Luiz dos Santos Reis Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5656-6519
Clarissa Stefani Teixeira Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Alexandre Augusto Biz Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-9328
Janaina Galdino de Barros Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3830-8110
Tatyana Lima Marinho Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-9291

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss9.3386

Keywords:

Innovation Center, Governance, Local Innovation Ecosystem, Beehive Model, Innovation Habitats;

Abstract

As an important economic and social transformation strategy that has been adopted throughout the world, the formation of local innovation ecosystems constitutes a network of cooperation in favor of local development through the innovation economy formed by different types of actors. Among these actors, innovation habitats stand out, in particular, innovation centers that bring together in a single location several mechanisms, programs and other habitats in one place, and can thus become an epicenter of innovation ecosystems. However, depending on the degree of maturity of the ecosystem, the management and integration of an innovation center may have certain difficulties in its execution, therefore, this article presents a governance model, called hive, based on the case of the innovation center Jaraguá in Maceió/AL, recently launched within an ecosystem still under construction. At the end, a unique new look at the governance of an innovation center in a reference ecosystem is launched, demonstrating its main obstacles, strengths and how the flow of knowledge is developed in it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABDALA, LA; ELEUTHERIOU, VC; DEPINE, A.; TEIXEIRA, CS Innovation Centers: what are they and what do they do? In: Habitats of Innovation: concept and practice. DEPINE, A.; TEIXEIRA, CS (Orgs). São Paulo: Perse, 2018. p. 132-151.

PROTECTIVE Mechanism for generating innovation projects and ecosystems. Available at <https://anprotec.org.br/site/sobre/incubadoras-e-parques>, accessed on December 10, 2020, at 10:03 pm.

ANSELL, C.; GASH, A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 543-571, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

AUDY, JLN Between tradition and renewal: the challenges of the entrepreneurial university. In: MOROSINI, M. The university in Brazil: conception and models. Brasília: National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira, 2nd ed., p. 267 - 274, 2011.

BALESTRIN, A. (2005). The dynamics of knowledge complementarity in the context of interorganizational networks. Doctoral thesis. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

CARAYANIS, EG; CAMBELL, DFJ Open innovation diplomacy and the 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (brake) ecosystem: building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. Available at <http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781461420613-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1263639-p174250662>. Accessed on March 20, 2018, at 22:28.

ETZKOWITZ, H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry government relations. Social Science Information, v. 42, no. 3, p. 293-337, 2003. Available at < ssi.sagepub.com >, accessed Dec 28, 2018, 17:16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002

ETZKOWITZ, H.; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, v. 29, no. 2, p. 109-123, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

FERREIRA, MCZ; TEIXEIRA, CS Innovation Centers: good practices mapped on the German experience In: Innovation Habitats: concept and practice. DEPINE, A.; TEIXEIRA, CS (Orgs). São Paulo: Perse, 2020. p. 57-72.

FIATES, Gabriela GS; MARTINS, C.; PICCININI, ACG; CORAL, E. Brazilian innovation system, challenges, strategies, actors: a benchmarking from international innovation systems. RACEF – Fundace's Journal of Administration, Accounting and Economics. v. 8, n. 3, p. 16-33, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13059/racef.v8i3.187

GOMES, LAV; FACIN ALF; SALERNO, MS; IKENAMI, RK Unpacking the Innnovation Ecosystem Construct: Evolution, Gaps and Trends. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v. 136, p. 30-48, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009

EMERSON, K.; NABATCHI, T.; BALOGH, S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 1-29, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011

JISHNU, V.; GILLOTRA, RM; MISHRA, DN Pharmacy education in India: Strategies for a better future. Journal of Young Pharmacists, vol. 3, n. 4, p. 334-342, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.90248

MARINHO, TL Identification of the Levels of Interaction and Cooperation of Institutions promoting innovation in Alagoas: a proposal for mapping innovation systems. Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting, Federal University of Alagoas. Maceio, p. 92, 2014.

OKSANEN, K; HAUTAMÄKI, A. Transforming regions into innovation ecosystems: A model for renewing local industrial structures. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, article 5, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/934

TECHNOLOGICAL PARK OF ALAGOAS. Information Technology, Communication and Services Hub. Available at < http://www.parquetecnologico.al.gov.br/about-tecnology-center> , Accessed on Apr. 15, 2021, at 23:04.

RAHMAN, H.; RAMOS, I - Open Innovation in SMEs: From closedboundaries to networked paradigm, 2010. Available in http://www.academia.edu/1548116/Open_Innovation_in_SMEs_From_closed_boundaries_to_networked_paradigm.Accessed on Jun 12, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/1221

FLORIANOPÓLIS INNOVATION NETWORK. About the Florianópolis innovation network. Available at < https://redeinovacao.floripa.br/sobre/sobre-a-rede/ >, accessed on Apr. 15, 2021.

RITALA, P.; ALMPANOPOULOU. In defense of “eco” in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, v. 60-61, p. 39-42, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.004

RUSSELL, MG et al. Transforming innovation ecosystems through shared vision and network orchestration. In: Triple Helix IX International Conference.

SANTA CATARINA, State Secretariat for Sustainable Economic Development. Innovation Centers Implementation Guide: Book II - Implementation Plan / State Secretariat for Sustainable Economic Development. - Florianópolis: SDS, 2017. Available at:<https://via.ufsc.br/download-ebook-centros-inovacao-2/>. Accessed on 03/25/2021.

TEIXEIRA, CS; TRZECIAK, DS; VARVAKIS, G. Innovation ecosystem: Conceptual alignment. Florianópolis: Perse, 24p.: 2017. Available at < http://via.ufsc.br/>, Accessed on December 10, 2020, at 9:57 pm.

TONHOLO, J.; SA, EMO ; ROSÁRIO, FJP ; LIMA, JGO ; AMORIM, JFO ; SILVA, K.; SANTA RITA, LP NASCIMENTO, MMG ; SILVA, PBB; ALBUQUERQUE, PP; FERREIRA JUNIOR, RR; MILK, SN UCHOA, SBB; ARAÚJO, VRBS . Alagoas: A contemporary vision of the Local Innovation System. In: Cesar Zen de Vasconcellos. (Org.). Cuba and Brazil in the 21st Century - CBS 21. ed. São Paulo: Editora Blucher, 2014, v. 1, p. 121-140.

VIOTTI, EB Fundamentals and Evolution of ST&I Indicators. In: VIOTTI EB; MACEDO, M. de M. (eds.). Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in Brazil. Campinas: UNICAMP, 2003.