Strategic feeding supplementation: An alternative for sustainability of beef production in native pastures

Lucas Carvalho Siqueira; Bruno Pagliarin Oliveira; Daniele Furian Araldi; Juliana Medianeira Machado; Claudia Prudencio Mera; Guilherme Konradt; Patricia Wolkmer

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss10.1785

Authors

Lucas Carvalho Siqueira Universidade de Cruz Alta
Bruno Pagliarin Oliveira UNICRUZ
Daniele Furian Araldi Unicruz
Juliana Medianeira Machado Unicruz
Claudia Prudencio Mera Unicruz
Guilherme Konradt Unicruz
Patricia Wolkmer Unicruz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss10.1785

Keywords:

sustainability

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of a strategic feeding supplementation protocol on reproductive and economic results of exclusively fixed timed artificial inseminated (FTAI) beef cows from a southern Brazilian herd. The experiment was carried out over 2 consecutive breeding seasons (2016 and 2017, from October to January). Two-hundred, 3 and 4 years old, non-suckled, Angus cows (n=100/year), were divided into two homogeneous groups (by weight and body condition score) 25 days before the first FTAI of the breeding season (First FTAI=Day 0). As a representation of traditional management of herds grazing on natural pastures from Rio Grande do Sul Province, Brazil, cows from control group (CG; n=100; 50 cows in each year) received basic mineral supplementation (without protein an energy) ad libitum during the entire experimental period. As an alternative feeding protocol, supplemented group (SG; n=100; 50 in each year) received a mineral supplementation enriched with protein (23%), energy (44% NDT) and sodium monensin (0.25%) ad libitum from days: –25 to 80 of breeding season. Cows were maintained in 2 separated paddocks of native pasture with similar forage composition and availability. All cows were submitted to a progesterone/estradiol-based estrus synchronization protocol on day -10, and cows not pregnant at diagnosis were resynchronized on days 28 and 76 using the same hormonal treatment. There was no year effect (P>0.1) on weight gain and reproductive results, data from both breeding seasons were polled together for further analyzes. Cows from SG presented higher average daily weight gain and gained more weight than cows from CG (p<0.001). Conception rate was higher for SG than CG at the first FTAI cycle (p<0.05). No differences between groups were detected on final pregnancy rates (CG=80% and SG=88%; p>0.1). Cows from SG became pregnant earlier (p<0.01) during the breeding seasons. Also, the feeding supplementation provided an opportunity to increase gross margin. In conclusion, strategic feeding supplementation of beef cows grazing in natural pasture and submitted exclusively to fixed timed artificial insemination increases cows’ weight gain, anticipates pregnancies during the breeding season and can increase profit margin when compared to traditional management adopted in southern Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baruselli, P. S., Sales, J. N. S., Sala, R. V., Vieira, L. M., & Sá Filho, M. F. (2018). History, evolution and perspectives of timed artificial insemination programs in Brazil. Animal Reproduction (AR), 9(3), 139-152.
Baruselli, P. S., Ferreira, R. M., Colli, M. H. A., Elliff, F. M., Sá Filho, M. F., Vieira, L., & de Freitas, B. G. (2018). Timed artificial insemination: current challenges and recent advances in reproductive efficiency in beef and dairy herds in Brazil. Animal Reproduction (AR), 14(3), 558-571.
Baruselli, P. S., Ferreira, R. M., Sá Filho, M. F., & Bó, G. A. (2018). Using artificial insemination v. natural Carvalho, N. A. T., Soares, J. G., & Baruselli, P. S. (2018). Evolution and perspectives of timed artificial insemination (TAI) programs in Brazil-A review. The Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction, 39(2), 1-8.
Bó, G. A., & Baruselli, P. S. (2014). Synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle. Animal, 8(s1), 144-150.
Bustamante, M. M., Nobre, C. A., Smeraldi, R., Aguiar, A. P., Barioni, L. G., Ferreira, L. G., ... & Ometto, J. P. (2012). Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from cattle raising in Brazil. Climatic change, 115(3-4), 559-577.
de CARVALHO, P. C. F., da Silva, S. C., Nabinger, C., Moraes, A. D., & Genro, T. C. (2008). Managing natural grasslands in a changing world: grazing ecology insights to accomplish re-oriented management expectations. In Embrapa Pecuária Sul-Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE). In: INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS, 21.; INTERNATIONAL RANGELAND CONGRESS, 7., 2008, Hohhot. Multifunctional grasslands in a changing world: proceedings. Guangzhou: Guangzhou People's Publishing House, 2008..
Carvalho, P. C. F, & Batello, C. (2009). Access to land, livestock production and ecosystem conservation in the Brazilian Campos biome: the natural grasslands dilemma. Livestock Science, 120(1-2), 158-162.
Carvalho, P. C. F., Nabinger, C., Lemaire, G., & Genro, T. C. M. (2011). Challenges and opportunities for livestock production in natural pastures: the case of Brazilian Pampa Biome. In Embrapa Pecuária Sul-Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE). In: INTERNATIONAL RANGELAND CONGRESS, 9., 2011, Rosario, Argentina. Diverse rangelands for a sustainable society:[plenary...]. Rosario: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agrpecuaria; Asociación Argentina para el Manejo de Pastizales Naturales, 2011. p. IX-XV..
Campos, J. T., Marinho, L. S. R., Lunardelli, P. A., Morotti, F., & Seneda, M. M. (2013). Resynchronization of estrous cycle with eCG and temporary calf removal in lactating Bos indicus cows. Theriogenology, 80(6), 619-623.
Brazilian College of Animal Reproduction CBRA - Manual para exame andrológico e avaliação de sêmen animal (third ed.), Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal, Belo Horizonte- MG (2016).
Colazo, M. G., Kastelic, J. P., Small, J. A., Wilde, R. E., Ward, D. R., & Mapletoft, R. J. (2007). Resynchronization of estrus in beef cattle: Ovarian function, estrus and fertility following progestin treatment and treatments to synchronize ovarian follicular development and estrus. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 48(1), 49.
Dick, M., da Silva, M. A., & Dewes, H. (2015). Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 426-434.
Duffield, T. F., Merrill, J. K., & Bagg, R. N. (2012). Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin in beef cattle on feed efficiency, body weight gain, and dry matter intake. Journal of Animal Science, 90(12), 4583-4592.
Fieser, B. G., Horn, G. W., & Edwards, J. T. (2007). Effects of energy, mineral supplementation, or both, in combination with monensin on performance of steers grazing winter wheat pasture. Journal of animal science, 85(12), 3470-3480.
Forero, L. C., Davy, J. S., McMurry, B. E., & Oltjen, J. W. (2019). Monensin and mineral supplementation economically increase yearling cattle weight gain on California annual rangeland. Translational Animal Science, 3(2), 737-741.
Funston, R. N., Musgrave, J. A., Meyer, T. L., & Larson, D. M. (2012). Effect of calving distribution on beef cattle progeny performance. Journal of animal science, 90(13), 5118-5121.
Hawkins, D. E., Petersen, M. K., Thomas, M. G., Sawyer, J. E., & Waterman, R. C. (2000). Can beef heifers and young postpartum cows be physiologically and nutritionally. J Anim Sci, 77, 1-10.
Lobato, J. F. P., Freitas, A., Devincenzi, T., Cardoso, L. L., Tarouco, J. U., Vieira, R. M., ... & Castro, I. (2014). Brazilian beef produced on pastures: sustainable and healthy. Meat science, 98(3), 336-345.
Modernel, P., Astigarraga, L., & Picasso, V. (2013). Global versus local environmental impacts of grazing and confined beef production systems. Environmental Research Letters, 8(3), 035052.
Mulligan, F. J., Caffrey, P. J., Rath, M., Kenny, M. J., & O’mara, F. P. (2001). The effect of dietary protein content and hay intake level on the true and apparent digestibility of hay. Livestock Production Science, 68(1), 41-52.
Oosthuizen, N., Fontes, P. L. P., Sanford, C. D., Ciriaco, F. M., Henry, D. D., Canal, L. B., ... & Lamb, G. C. (2018). Estrus synchronization and fixed-time artificial insemination alter calving distribution in Bos indicus influenced beef heifers. Theriogenology, 106, 210-213.
Pessoa, G. A., Martini, A. P., Sá Filho, M. F., & Rubin, M. I. B. (2018). Resynchronization improves reproductive efficiency of suckled Bos taurus beef cows subjected to spring-summer or autumn-winter breeding season in South Brazil. Theriogenology, 122, 14-22.
Rouquette Jr, F. M., Griffin, J. L., Randel, R. D., & Carroll, L. H. (1980). Effect of monensin on gain and forage utilization by calves grazing bermudagrass. Journal of animal science, 51(3), 521-525.
Gardner, A. L. (1986). Técnicas de pesquisa em pastagens e aplicabilidade de resultados em sistemas de produção (No. 634). IICA Biblioteca Venezuela.
Rodgers, J. C., Bird, S. L., Larson, J. E., DiLorenzo, N., Dahlen, C. R., DiCostanzo, A., & Lamb, G. C. (2012). An economic evaluation of estrous synchronization and timed artificial insemination in suckled beef cows. Journal of animal science, 90(11), 4055-4062.
Ruviaro, C. F., de Léis, C. M., Lampert, V. D. N., Barcellos, J. O. J., & Dewes, H. (2015). Carbon footprint in different beef production systems on a southern Brazilian farm: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 435-443.
Ruviaro, C. F., da Costa, J. S., Florindo, T. J., Rodrigues, W., de Medeiros, G. I. B., & Vasconcelos, P. S. (2016). Economic and environmental feasibility of beef production in different feed management systems in the Pampa biome, southern Brazil. Ecological indicators, 60, 930-939.
Santos, T., & Trevisan, R. (2009). Eucaliptos versus Bioma Pampa: compreendendo as diferenças entre lavouras de arbóreas e o campo nativo. Lavouras de Destruição: a (im) posição do consenso, 299-332.
SILVA, D.J.; QUEIROZ, A.C. Análise de alimentos (métodos químicos e biológicos). 3.ed. Viçosa, MG: Editora UFV, 2002. 235p.
SEAPA - Secretaria da Agricultura, Pecuária e Agronegócio do Rio Grande do Sul, Dados estatísticos. http://www.agricultura.rs.gov.br (2019)
Thompson, L. R., Beck, M. R., Gunter, S. A., Williams, G. D., Place, S. E., & Reuter, R. R. (2019). An energy and monensin supplement reduces methane emission intensity of stocker cattle grazing winter wheat. Applied Animal Science, 35(4), 433-440.
Tilley, J. M. A., & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two‐stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and forage science, 18(2), 104-111.
Van Soest, P. J. (2018). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell university press.
Veysset, P., Lherm, M., & Bébin, D. (2010). Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts. Agricultural Systems, 103(1), 41-50.