Intellectual Property Indicators in the Mesoregions of the State of Alagoas-Brazil

Luanna Pereira de Morais; Silvana Nunes de Queiroz; Cristiano Quintino Furtado; Gabriel Francisco da Silva

doi:10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss8.2568

Authors

Luanna Pereira de Morais Federal University of Sergipe https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-1744
Silvana Nunes de Queiroz Regional University of Cariri https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-3212
Cristiano Quintino Furtado Federal Institute of Alagoas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-863X
Gabriel Francisco da Silva Federal University of Sergipe https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9622-2518

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss8.2568

Keywords:

East Alagoano, Agreste Alagoano, Sertão Alagoano, intellectual protection, local development

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze local, innovative and sustainable development in the three Mesoregions of Alagoas, through intellectual property indicators (patents, trademarks, industrial design and geographical indications). The methodology consists of the analysis of secondary sources extracted from the Statistical Database on Industrial Property (BADEPI), available on the website of the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), for the years 2010 to 2017. The results point out marked differences, with the eastern Alagoas mesoregion concentrating the intellectual property indicators with two geographical indications, 95.93% of the patent deposits and 84.73% of the deposits of trademark registrations, as well as industrial designs and computer programs. Agreste Alagoano presents a reasonable amount of intellectual protection, with emphasis on the municipality of Arapiraca. Sertão Alagoano, on the other hand, has the worst situation, low amount of intellectual property, even in a region with a diversified cultural and environmental environment. Thus, it was found that the Mesoregions of Alagoas need an ecosystem that invests in the innovation process in the region, especially the Sertão Alagoano.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luanna Pereira de Morais, Federal University of Sergipe

Master student in Intellectual Property Sciences Federal University of Sergipe (UFS). Graduated in Economic Sciences from the Regional University of Cariri (URCA).
Silvana Nunes de Queiroz, Regional University of Cariri

Economist. PhD in Demography from the University of Campinas (UNICAMP). Post-doctorate from PPGDem / UFRN. Adjunct Professor at the Department of Economics at the Regional University of Cariri (Urca).
Cristiano Quintino Furtado , Federal Institute of Alagoas

EBTT Professor at the Federal Institute of Alagoas, Master in Chemical Engineering.
Gabriel Francisco da Silva, Federal University of Sergipe

Doctor in Food Engineering from the State University of Campinas. Master in Chemical Engineering from the Federal University of Paraíba. Associate professor at the Petroleum Engineering Nucleus at the Federal University of Sergipe. Participate in the Graduate Programs in Chemical Engineering, the Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science and the Graduate Program in the Northeastern Biotechnology Network.

References

Belletti, G. Marescotti, A. and Touzard, J. Geographical indications, public goods, and sustainable development: The roles of actors strategies and public policies. World Development, 2017, v. 98, pp. 45-57. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004 >. Accessed: 16/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004

Billi, A. L. Indicações Geográficas no Brasil. Turismo Rural, Indicação Geográfica, Gastronomia e Sustentabilidade. Org. Geni Satiko Sato. São Paulo: SAA-IEA, 2016, pp.71. Available at: < http://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/fr/c/462347/ >. Acessed: 12/01/2020.

Calboli, I. Geographical indications of origin at the crossroads of local development, consumer protection and marketing strategies. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2015, v. 46, n. 7, pp. 760-780. Available at: < https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-015-0394-0 >. Acessed: 09/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0394-0

Capello, R. & Lenzi, C. The nexus between inventors’ mobility and regional growth across European regions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2019, v. 21, n. 4, pp. 457-486. Available at: < https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10109-019-00308-z >. Acessed: 29/02/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-019-00308-z

Carvalho, Í. C. S., Pereira, J. P. C. N. and Ferreira, M. I. Indicação geográfica e desenvolvimento local: Uma análise sob o enfoque da dinâmica territorial. Revista Espacios, 2017, v. 38, n. 09, pp. 27. Available at: < http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n09/a17v38n09p27.pdf >. Acessed: 09/01/2020.

Cerdan, C. M. T. et al. Indicações Geográficas de produtos agropecuários: Importância histórica e atual: Uma breve história sobre os sinais distintivos e as Indicações Geográficas (IG). In: PIMENTEL, L. O. et al. (Org.). Curso de propriedade intelectual & inovação no agronegócio: Módulo III Indicação Geográfica. Florianópolis: FUNJAB, 2014, 4ª ed., cap.1, pp. 32-58. Available at: < http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/sustentabilidade/indicacao-geografica/arquivospublicacoes-ig/livro-curso-de-propriedade-intelecual-inovacao-no-agronegocio-modulo-iiindicacao-geografica.pdf>. Acessed: 29/12/2019.

DATASEBRAE. Indicações Geográficas Brasileiras. SEBRAE. Available at: < https://datasebrae.com.br/indicacoesgeograficas/ >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Dziallas, M. & Blind, K. Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 2019, v. 80, pp. 3-29. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005 >. Acessed: 10/04/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005

FAO- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Geographical Indications for sustainable food systems Preserving and promoting agricultural and food heritage, 2019. Available at: < http://www.fao.org/3/ca5693en/ca5693en.pdf >. Acessed: 10/01/2020.

Fochezatto, A.; Tartaruga I. G. P. Indicador de potencial de inovação tecnológica e desenvolvimento nos municípios do Rio Grande do Sul. Ensaios FEE, 2013, v. 34. Available at: < http://repositorio.pucrs.br/dspace/bitstream/10923/10449/2/Indicador_de_potencial_de_inovacao_tecnologica_e_desenvolvimento_nos_municipios_do_Rio_Grande_do_Sul.pdf>. Acessed: 19/05/2020.

Giesbrecht, H. O. et al. Indicações geográficas brasileiras. Brasília: SEBRAE, INPI, 2014, 4ª Ed., pp. 264. Available at: < https://bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Harrison, J. et al. Pushing regional studies beyond its borders. Regional Studies, 2020, v. 54, n. 1, pp. 129-139. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1672146 >. Acessed: 10/04/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1672146

IBGE. Cidades. Available at: < https://cidades.ibge.gov.br >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

IBGE. Portal de mapas. Shp, 2019. Available at: < https://portaldemapas.ibge.gov.br >. Acessed: 20/062020.

INEP. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Sinopse Estatística da Educação Superior 2018. Brasília: Inep, 2019. Available at: < http://portal.inep.gov.br/web/guest/sinopses-estatisticas-da-educacao-superior >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

INPI. Indicações Geográficas. Available at: < https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/servicos/indicacoes-geograficas >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

INPI. Indicadores de Propriedade Industrial. Edição 2018. Available at: < https://www.gov.br/inpi/pt-br/central-de-conteudo/estatisticas >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Kisman, Z. A. & Tasar, I. The key elements of local development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, v. 15, pp. 1689-1696. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00642-X >. Acessed: 10/04/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00642-X

Kizos, T. et al. The governance of geographical indications: Experiences of practical implementation of selected case studies in Austria, Italy, Greece and Japan. British Food Journal, 2017, v. 119 Issue: 12, pp.2863-2879. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2017-0037 >. Acessed: 12/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2017-0037

Lentz, S. Towards a Sustainable Future? Challenges for Regional Development and Innovation, p. 443-444. In: Frühauf, M. et al. (Ed.). KULUNDA: Climate Smart Agriculture: South Siberian Agro-steppe as Pioneering Region for Sustainable Land Use. Springer Nature, 2019, pp. 1-509. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15927-6 >. Acessed: 29/02/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15927-6

Lima Medeiros, M., Terra, L. A. A. and Passador, J. L. Geographical indications and territorial development: A soft‐system methodology analysis of the Serro Case. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2019, pp.1-15. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2601 >. Acessed: 23/12/2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2601

Lorenzini, E., Calzati, V. and Giudici, P. Territorial brands for tourism development: A statistical analysis on the Marche region. Annals of Tourism Research, 2011, v. 38, n. 2, pp. 540-560. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.10.008 >. Acessed: 09/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.10.008

Machnicka, A. A. Territorial Aspects of Community Trademarks–The Single Market’s Splendid Sovereignty. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2014, v. 45, n. 8, pp. 915-939. Available at: < https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-014-0271-2 >. Acessed: 09/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0271-2

Maiorki, G. J. & Dallabrida, V. R. Indicación geográfica de productos: un estudio de su contribución económica en el desarrollo territorial. Campo Grande: Interações, 2015, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 13-25. Available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/151870122015101 >. Acessed: 23/12/2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/151870122015101

Mancini, M. C. et al. Geographical Indications and Transatlantic Trade Negotiations: Different US and EU Perspectives. EuroChoices, 2016, v. 16, n. 2, pp. 34-40. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12131 >. Acessed: 09/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12131

Mikhaylova, A. A. In pursuit of an innovation development trajectoryof the Kaliningrad region. Baltic Region, 2019, v. 11, n. 3, pp. 92-106. Available at: < https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41384729 >. Acessed: 10/04/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-5

Nascimento, J. S., Nunes, G. S. and Bandeira, M. G. A. A importância de uma indicação geográfica no desenvolvimento do turismo de uma região. Revista GEINTEC, São Cristóvão, SE, 2012, v. 2, n. 4, pp. 378-386. Available at: < http://www.revistageintec.net/index.php/revista/article/view/54 >. Acessed: 27/12/2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7198/S2237-0722201200040005

Negri, F. Novos caminhos para a inovação no Brasil / Autora: Fernanda de Negri, Organizadores: Wilson Center, Interfarma – Washington, DC: Wilson Center, 2018, pp. 159. Available at < http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/8441>. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Pelse, M. et al. Cooperation as a Sustainable Factor Influencing Innovation In Regional Development: The Case Of The Bioeconomy in Latvia. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 2018, v. 7, n. 3. Available at: < http://jssidoi.org/jssi/papers/papers/view/293 >. Acessed: 23/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.3(17)

PNUD. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil, 2013. Available at: < http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/pt/home/ >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F. Why early collective action pays off: evidence from setting Protected Geographical Indications. Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2016, v. 32, n. 2, pp. 179-192. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170516000168 >. Acessed: 09/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170516000168

SEPLAG –AL. Produto Interno Bruto dos Municípios em 2017. Nota Técnica. Secretaria de Estado do Planejamento, Gestão e Patrimônio de Alagoas, Maceió, 2019, n. 03. Available at: < http://dados.al.gov.br/ >. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Silva, A.N. G. & Silva Neto, C. J. Caderno Setorial de Indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em Alagoas. Maceió, 2018, pp. 48. Available at < dados.al.gov.br>. Acessed: 20/06/2020.

Silva, F. N. Desafios à institucionalização das indicações geográficas no Brasil. Desenvolvimento Regional em debate, 2012, v. 2, n. 2, pp. 31-44. Available at: < https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5443915 >. Acessed: 29/12/2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24302/drd.v2i2.258

Sleuwaegen, L. & Boiardi, P. Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 9, p. 1508-1522, 2014. Available at < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.014 >. Acessed: 06/02/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.014

Streltsova, E. & Linton, J. D. Biotechnology Patenting in the BRICS Countries: Strategies and Dynamics. Trends in biotechnology, 2018, v. 36, n. 7, pp. 642-645. Available at < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.11.008 >. Acessed: 25/06/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.11.008

Tkachenko, E. & Bodrunov, S. Development of the knowledge economy and regional innovation policy: Russian practice. In: European Conference on Knowledge Management. Academic Conferences International Limited, 2014, pp. 964. Available at: < https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lisete_Monico/publicat >. Acessed: 17/03/2020.

Van Aswegen, M. & Retief, F. P. The role of innovation and knowledge networks as a policy mechanism towards more resilient peripheral regions. Land Use Policy, 2020, v. 90, pp. 1-12. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104259 >. Acessed: 10/02/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104259

Vázquez‐Barquero, A. & Rodríguez‐Cohard, J. C. Local development in a global world: Challenges and opportunities. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2018, v. 11, n. 6, pp. 885-897. Available at: < https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12164 >. Acessed: 12/01/2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12164