Rural tourism

An analysis througt the assumptions of the new institutional economy

Authors

  • Cláudia Brazil Marques Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2975-348X
  • Carlos Honorato Schuch Santos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Dr. Fabrício Moraes de Almeida Federal University of Rondônia, Brazil
  • Carlos Alberto Paraguassú-Chaves University of Brasília
  • Simão Dolezel Aznar University Institute of Rio de Janeiro
  • Levi Pereira Granja de Souza Estácio de Sá University
  • Carlos Alberto Dolezel Trindade University Institute of Rio de Janeiro
  • Carlos Eugênio Pereira Faculdade Instituto Rio de Janeiro
  • Ricardo Guanabara University Institute of Rio de Janeiro
  • David Lopes Maciel MUST UNIVERSITY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss1.3599

Keywords:

New Institutional Economy (NIE), Tourism, Rural property, Wine

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the decision-making of the agents through the theoretical assumptions of the New Institutional Economics (NIE), and the results in transaction costs of rural property activity added tourism to its agricultural business. The methodology adopted was the exploratory and explanatory study. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and the analysis was qualitative. Finally, we know that we still need to find appropriate tools to reduce the asymmetry of information and allow a wider field of view to making agents' decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Cláudia Brazil Marques, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

    PhD in Agribusiness -CEPAN, State University of the State of Rio Grande do Sul- UERGS- Policy Research Group, Public Management and Development of Uergs/CNPq.

  • Carlos Honorato Schuch Santos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

    PhD in Production Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande-FURG, Department of Chemical and Food Engineering.

  • Dr. Fabrício Moraes de Almeida, Federal University of Rondônia, Brazil

    Researcher of the Doctoral and Master Program in Regional Development and Environment (PGDRA/UFRO). Leader of line 2 ― Technological and Systemic Development, and Researcher of GEITEC

  • Carlos Alberto Paraguassú-Chaves, University of Brasília

    4 PhD in Health Sciences,  PhD in Science -University of Havana (Cuba); Post-Doctor in Health Sciences -UnB and Degli Studi D'Aquila University -IT. Full Professor at the University Institute of Rio de Janeiro -IURJ, Brazil.

  • Simão Dolezel Aznar, University Institute of Rio de Janeiro

    Graduated in Law. Master of Law Student, Specialist in Law. Professor.

  • Levi Pereira Granja de Souza, Estácio de Sá University

    Master's Degree in Administration from. Professor at the University Institute of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Professor at the University Institute of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Carlos Alberto Dolezel Trindade, University Institute of Rio de Janeiro

    Graduated in Law and Psychology. Specialist in Higher Education Teaching. Professor.

  • Carlos Eugênio Pereira, Faculdade Instituto Rio de Janeiro

    Specialist in Education - UniverCidade. Graduated in Law – Gama Filho University. Professor.

  • Ricardo Guanabara, University Institute of Rio de Janeiro

    PhD in Political Science from IUPERJ, Brazil. Professor.

  • David Lopes Maciel, MUST UNIVERSITY

    Professional Master in Master of Science in Emergent Technologies in Education

References

Pine, B. J. II, and Gilmore, J. H.1999. The experience economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Kotler, P. 1999. Marketing para o século XXI: como criar, conquistar e dominar mercados. São Paulo: Atlas.

Williamson, O. E. 2000. The New Institutional Economics: taking Stock, looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVIIII, pp. 595–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

Coase, R. H. 1992. The institutional structure of production. The American Economic Review, v. 82, n. 4, p. 713-719.

Rezende, C. L,. Zylberstajn, D. 1999. Uma análise da complexidade do gerenciamento rural. In: IV SEMEAD.

Lane. B. 2014. Turismo rural de segunda geração: Prioridades e questão de pesquisa. In: CRISTÓVÃO, A.; PEREIRO, X. (Org.). Turismo rural em tempos de novas ruralidades. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.

Kastenholz, E. 2014. A experiência de turismo em meio rural - Conceptualização na perspectiva do turista e reflexão sobre a natureza da experiência turística, com base em dados recolhidos em 3 aldeias portuguesas. In: CRISTÓVÃO, ARTHUR et al. (Org.). Turismo Rural em Tempos de Novas Ruralidades. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS.

Simon, H. A. 1979. Comportamento administrativo: estudo dos processos decisórios nas organizações administrativas. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

Contini, E.; Araújo, D.; Garrido, W. E. 1984. Instrumental econômico para a decisão na propriedade agrícola. Planejamento da Propriedade Agrícola: modelos de decisão. 2ª ed. Brasília: EMBRAPA-DDT.

Pagliarussi, M. S.; Alves, J. M. 2006. O fenômeno do agroturismo e a influência das instituições no desenvolvimento econômico local: Um Estudo de Caso na Região Centro-Serrana do Espírito Santo. Anais Eletrônicos do XXX ENANPAD - Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração, Salvador.

Gil, A. C. 2007. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.

Levy, Y.; Ellis, T.J. 2006. A system approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, v. 9, p.181-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/479

Creswell, J. W. W. 2010. Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Kahnemann, D; Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, v. 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Downloads

Published

2022-01-01

How to Cite

Marques, C. B., Schuch Santos, C. H., Almeida, D. F. M. de ., Paraguassú-Chaves, C. A., Aznar, S. D., de Souza, L. P. G., Dolezel Trindade, . C. A., Pereira, C. E., Guanabara, R., & Maciel, D. L. (2022). Rural tourism: An analysis througt the assumptions of the new institutional economy. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 10(1), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss1.3599
Received 2021-11-17
Accepted 2021-12-31
Published 2022-01-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>