A School Selfie

digital competences and interaction with students during emergency remote teaching

Authors

  • Tania Filomena Knittel Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Joao Mattar Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6265-6150
  • Wanderlucy Angelica Alves Correa Czeszak TÉLUQ University
  • Neide Aparecida Arruda de Oliveira Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss8.3754

Keywords:

distance education, pandemic, teaching practice, parent-school relationship, communication strategies

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, schools offered what became known as emergency remote teaching. However, teachers, students, school leaders, and parents were naturally unprepared to teach and study at a distance. This article aims to evaluate the support offered to students during the pandemic in a school in the city of São Paulo (Brazil). A mixed-approach case study used as a theoretical reference DigCompOrg, a framework for assessing digital competence developed by the European Commission. Teachers, school leaders, and students answered a DigCompOrg-based questionnaire (SELFIE), some of which were selected to participate in interviews and focus groups. The research also involved documents analysis and participant observation. The results indicated that the school offered adequate support to students, parents, and teachers. However, some challenges were identified, such as communication with families, timely feedback, assessment at a distance, and plagiarism. The research results may enhance the development of a plan to improve student support in the school.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Tania Filomena Knittel, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

    Colégio Emilie de Villeneuve, Brasil

  • Joao Mattar, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

    Universidade Santo Amaro (Unisa), Brasil

  • Wanderlucy Angelica Alves Correa Czeszak, TÉLUQ University

    TÉLUQ University

  • Neide Aparecida Arruda de Oliveira, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

    Centro Universitário Teresa D'Ávila (UNIFATEA), Brasil

References

Brindley, J. E. (2014). Learner support in online distance education: essential and evolving. In Zawacki-Richter, O., & Anderson, T. (Eds.). (2014). Online distance education: Towards a research agenda (pp. 287-310). Athabasca University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.

Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., & Rūdolfa, A. (2021). Parents’ Perspectives on Remote Learning in the Pandemic Context. Sustainability, 13(7), 3640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073640

Demir, E., & Demir, C. G. (2021). Investigation of Parents’ opinions about Distance Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 42-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906485

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2-3), 87-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Jézégou, A. (2010). Créer de la présence à distance en e-learning : Cadre théorique, définition, et dimensions clés. Distances et savoirs, 2(2), 257-274. https://www.cairn.info/revue-distances-et-savoirs-2010-2-page-257.htm DOI : 10.3166/ds.8.257-274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/ds.8.257-274

Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting effective digital-age learning-A European framework for digitally-competent educational organizations (No. JRC98209). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

Korlat, S., Kollmayer, M., Holzer, J., Lüftenegger, M., Pelikan, E. R., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2021). Gender Differences in Digital Learning During COVID-19: Competence Beliefs, Intrinsic Value, Learning Engagement, and Perceived Teacher Support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637776

Krueger, R. A, &; Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage.

Lau, E. Y. H., & Lee, K. (2021). Parents’ views on young children’s distance learning and screen time during COVID-19 class suspension in Hong Kong. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 863-880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1843925

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (ed), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-39). Routledge.

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education & social sciences. Teachers College.

Thurmond, V. A. (2003). Examination of interaction variables as predictors of students’ satisfaction and willingness to enroll in future web-based courses while controlling for student characteristics. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.bookpump.com/dps/pdf-b/1121814b.pdf

Yacci, M. (2000). Interactivity demystified: A structural definition for online learning and intelligent CBT. Educational Technology, 40(4), 5-16.

Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2021). High school students’ experience of online learning during Covid-19: the influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Knittel, T. F., Mattar, J., Correa Czeszak, W. A. A., & Oliveira, N. A. A. de. (2022). A School Selfie: digital competences and interaction with students during emergency remote teaching. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 10(8), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol10.iss8.3754
Received 2022-04-05
Accepted 2022-04-20
Published 2022-08-01