The enhancement of Interactive Whiteboard Integration in Preschool
A Mathematic Lesson Imlementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss12.57Keywords:
Interactive Whiteboard, Mathematics, preschoolAbstract
The aim of this study is to verify the importance of using the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in the teaching process especially in Mathematics at the preschool level. Although the IWB software offers a huge number of tools and features, teachers are not benefiting from them efficiently. Instead, they are using the IWB as a projector most of the time. At AZM school, A study took place on 40 KG2 students aged between four and five; They were divided into two groups of 20, where only one of the two groups was exposed to activities on the IWB about number seven called the study group and the other the control group. The activities varied between recognizing, counting, sorting and tracing the number 7. All 40 students were assessed in the same manner. Results showed that the group of students that did the designed activities and used the IWB achieved higher scores on their assessments than those who did not participate in the activities. Results also showed that students got motivated, engaged and more encouraged when using the IWB.
Downloads
References
Alex Morgan (2010)
Interactive whiteboards, interactivity and play in the classroom with children aged
three to seven years, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18:1, 93 104, D OI:
1080/13502930903520082
Baroody, J. A., & Wilkins, M. J., (n.d.).The Development of Informal Counting, number, and Arithmetic
Skills and Concepts. Mathematics in early years. Pp. 48 65
Betcher, C., & Lee, M., (2009).
The Interactive Whiteboard revoluti on: Teaching with IWBs. Australia:
ACER Press
Bourbour, M., &Bjorklund, C., (2014). Preschool teacher’s reasoning about Interactive Whiteboard DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/nbf.608
embedded in Mathematics education in Swedish Preschools. Journal of NORDIC Early Childhood
Education Research.7 (2 ). 1 16
British Educational Communications and technology Agency. (2004). Embedding ICT @ Secondary. Use
of Interactive Whiteboards in mathematics.DFEs Publisher. Retrieved from
http://www.secondarymathsite.co.uk/ICT/IWBs/Advice&Guidance/DfEs 08122004 use %20of%20IAW
%20in%20Mathematics.pdf
Clamants
, D. H., &Sarama, J., (2008). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics : Curriculum Focal
Points: Pre K to Kindergarten. Teaching Children Mathematics.14 (6). 361 365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.14.6.0361
Cross, T. C., Woods, A. T., &Schweingruber
, H., (2009). Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood:
Paths Toward Excellence and Equity. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
Drigas, A., &Papanastasiou, G. P., (2014).Interactive Whiteboards in preschool and primary DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v10i4.3754
education. International Journ al of Online Engineering.10 (4), 46 51.Doi: 10.3991/ijoe.VlOi4.3754
Han, L., LEARN 101. (2015). EDUC 1335.
University of Victoria.
Linder, M. S., (2012). Interactive Whiteboards in Early Childhood Mathematics. Strategies for Effective
Implementation in Pre k Grade 3. Technology and Young Children .
Lisenbee, P., (2009). Whiteboards and Web Sites: Digital Tools for the Early Childhood Curriculum.
YCYoung Children.64
(6). 92 95
Mapp, K., & Henderson, A., (2002). Doing Mathematics with your child. Ontari
o: Literacy and
Numeracy Secretariat
Noor,S., (2013). An Effective use of ICT for Educational and Learning by Drawing on Worldwide
Knowledge, Research, and Experience: ICT as a Change Agent for Education. Retrieved from University
of Kshmir , Department of Education Web site: http://www.nyu.edu/classes/keefer/waoe/amins.pdf
Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L., & Swan, P., (2010). Interactive Whiteboards: Interactive or
just Whiteboards? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (4), 494 510
Pr
eston, C. &Mowbray, L. (2008).Use of Smart boards for teaching, learning and assessment in
kindergarten science. Teaching Science, 54(2), 50 53
SMART technologies Inc. (2006).
Interactive Whiteboards and Learning. Canada: SMART Technologies
SMART.
( 20 06). Interactive Whiteboard and Learning Improving Student Learning outcomes and
Streamlining lesson planning. Canada, TX: Author
Smith, J. H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J., (2005). Interactive Whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A
critical review of li terature Journal of Computer Assisted learning 21 . 91 101
Turel, Y.K. & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers’ Believe and Use of Interactive White Boards for Teaching
and Learning. Educational Technology &Society. 15 (1), 381 394
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Souraya Hazim Al Hassan, Naim El Rouadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
